Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: Where do we draw the line?

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 689-694

  Clement, Nicholas D ^a   MacDonald, Deborah ^a   Burnett, Richard ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Outcome; Oxford score; Satisfaction; Thresholds; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ROC CURVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877874567     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1728-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ (2010) The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 340:c186
2. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:63-69
3. Department for Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. 2010. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publlicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PubicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-117353 (date last accessed 16th Decemeber 2012)
4. Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, Price A, Javaid MK, Beard D, Murray D, Field RE (2012) Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:412-418
5. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand national joint registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:508-512
6. Keenan AC, Wood AM, Arthur CA, Jenkins PJ, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ (2012) Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:928-931
7. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ (2005) Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties-a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplast 20:1037-1041
8. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wywich KW (2003) Interpretatation of the changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582-592
9. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP (2004) Reliable change and minimum difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsivemess comparisons using indvidual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 57:1008-1019
10. Scott CEH, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2010) Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction following Total Knee Replacement: A prospective study of 1217 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:1253-1258
11. General Register Office for Scotland. http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/ files2/stats/gros-mid-2008-population-estimates-scotland-population-estimates- by-sex-age-and-administrative-area/j1075008.htm (date last accessed 16th Decemeber 2012)
12. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149-158
13. Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1253-1258
14. Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD (2007) Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:21-26
15. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262-267
16. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:893-900
17. Johnston L, Maclennan G, McCormack K, Ramsay C, Walker A (2009) The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:134-141
18. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2011) The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1265-1270
19. Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2012) Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:974-981