The mid-term outcomes of the Oxford Domed Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 96 B, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 59-64

  Weston Simons, J S ^a   Pandit, H ^a   Kendrick, B J L ^a   Jenkins, C ^b   Barker, K ^b   Dodd, C A F ^b   Murray, D W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DOMED LATERAL OXFORD UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMNT; FEMALE; FEMUR OSTEOTOMY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT INJURY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OVERALL SURVIVAL; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATELLA FRACTURE; PIGMENTED VILLONODULAR SYNOVITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 84892587359     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.31630     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:198-204.
2. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, et al. Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2010;17:392-397.
3. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:1189-1195.
4. O'Connor JJ, Shercliff TL, Biden E, Goodfellow JW. The geometry of the knee in the sagittal plane. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1989;203:223-233.
5. Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, et al. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee 1996;3:33-39.
6. Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, et al. Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: a radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:653-657.
7. Tokuhara Y, Kadoya Y, Nakagawa S, Kobayashi A, Takaoka K. The flexion gap in normal knees: an MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:1133-1136.
8. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:1199-1200.
9. Streit MR, Walker T, Bruckner T, et al. Mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford domed tibial component an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B:1356-1361.
10. Altuntas AO, Alsop H, Cobb JP. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre. Knee 2012: Epub.
11. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-69.
12. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14.
13. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;198:43-49.
14. Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1984;66-B:523-528.
15. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Dodd C A F, Murray DW. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006:117-128.
16. Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, et al. The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:896-902.
17. Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Stockholm 1968; (Suppl 277): 7-72.
18. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1-39.
19. Weston-Simons JS, Pandit H, Gill HS, et al. The management of mobile bearing dislocation in the Oxford lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:2023-2026.
20. John J, Mauffrey C, May P. Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. Int Orthop 2011;35:507-513.
21. Matharu G, Robb C, Baloch K, Pynsent P. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: survival and the affect of age and gender. Knee 2012;19:913-917.
22. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:970-976.
23. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Ninth Annual Report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 6 September 2013).
24. Forster MC, Bauze AJ, Keene GC. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: fixed or mobile bearing? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:1107-1111.
25. Baker PN, Petheram T, Jameson SS, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B:919-927.
26. No authors listed. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry: 13 year report: January 1999 to December 2011. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/reports/A2D65CA3.pdf (date last accessed 6 September 2013).
27. Schelfaut S, Beckers L, Verdonk P, Bellemans J, Victor J. The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012: Epub.