Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 905-915

  Amer, Tarek ^a,b   Campbell, Karen L ^c   Hasher, Lynn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aging; cognitive control

Indexed keywords

AGING OF MATERIALS; BIOLOGY; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE CONTROL; CREATIVE SOLUTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION; NOCV1;

NEUROIMAGING;

AGING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; MODEL; ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85002673045     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. 1 Hasher, L., et al. Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. Gopher, D., Koriat, A., (eds.) Attention and Performance XVII, Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, 1999, MIT Press, 653–675.
2. 2 Anguera, J.A., et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 501 (2013), 97–101.
3. 3 Mahncke, H.W., et al. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006), 12523–12528.
4. 4 Zendel, B.R., et al. The impact of attentional training on event-related potentials in older adults. Neurobiol. Aging 47 (2016), 10–22.
5. 5 Toril, P., et al. Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol. Aging 29 (2014), 706–716.
6. 6 Vogel, E.K., et al. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature 438 (2005), 500–503.
7. 7 Lustig, C., et al. Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130 (2001), 199–207.
8. 8 Shipstead, Z., et al. The mechanisms of working memory capacity: primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. J. Mem. Lang. 72 (2014), 116–141.
9. 9 Healey, M.K., et al. Direct evidence for the role of inhibition in resolving interference in memory. Psychol. Sci. 21 (2010), 1464–1470.
10. 10 Healey, M.K., et al. Below-baseline suppression of competitors during interference resolution by younger but not older adults. Psychol. Sci. 25 (2014), 145–151.
11. 11 Healey, M.K., et al. The role of suppression in resolving interference: evidence for an age-related deficit. Psychol. Aging 28 (2013), 721–728.
12. 12 Murayama, K., et al. Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol. Bull. 140 (2014), 1383–1409.
13. 13 Anderson, M.C., Hanslmayr, S., Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18 (2014), 279–292.
14. 14 Benoit, R.G., et al. Adaptive top-down suppression of hippocampal activity and the purging of intrusive memories from consciousness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27 (2015), 96–111.
15. 15 Darowski, E.S., et al. Age-related differences in cognition: the role of distraction control. Neuropsychology 22 (2008), 638–644.
16. 16 Mund, I., et al. Aging and interference in story recall. Exp. Aging Res. 38 (2012), 20–41.
17. 17 Dey, A., Sommers, M.S., Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception. Psychol. Aging 30 (2015), 634–646.
18. 18 Lustig, C., et al. Distraction as a determinant of processing speed. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13 (2006), 619–625.
19. 19 Unsworth, N., et al. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27 (2015), 853–865.
20. 20 Anderson, M.C., et al. Remembering can cause forgetting – retrieval dynamics in long-term-memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 20 (1994), 1063–1087.
21. 21 Roman, P., et al. Retrieval-induced forgetting and executive control. Psychol. Sci. 20 (2009), 1053–1058.
22. 22 Penolazzi, B., et al. Human memory retrieval and inhibitory control in the brain: beyond correlational evidence. J. Neurosci. 34 (2014), 6606–6610.
23. 23 Lee, T.G., et al. Disruption of dorsolateral but not ventrolateral prefrontal cortex improves unconscious perceptual memories. J. Neurosci. 33 (2013), 13233–13237.
24. 24 Aslin, R.N., Infant learning: historical, conceptual, and methodological challenges. Infancy 19 (2014), 2–27.
25. 25 Chrysikou, E.G., et al. A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control. Neuropsychologia 62 (2014), 341–355.
26. 26 Thompson-Schill, S.L., et al. Cognition without control: when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18 (2009), 259–263.
27. 27 Casey, B.J., et al. Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biol. Psychol. 54 (2000), 241–257.
28. 28 Finn, A.S., et al. When it hurts (and helps) to try: the role of effort in language learning. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e101806.
29. 29 Cochran, B.P., et al. Too smart for their own good: the disadvantage of a superior processing capacity for adult language learners. J. Mem. Lang. 41 (1999), 30–58.
30. 30 Nemeth, D., et al. Boosting human learning by hypnosis. Cereb. Cortex 23 (2013), 801–805.
31. 31 Fletcher, P.C., et al. On the benefits of not trying: brain activity and connectivity reflecting the interactions of explicit and implicit sequence learning. Cereb. Cortex 15 (2005), 1002–1015.
32. 32 Beilock, S.L., DeCaro, M.S., From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33 (2007), 983–998.
33. 33 Chrysikou, E.G., Thompson-Schill, S.L., Dissociable brain states linked to common and creative object use. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32 (2011), 665–675.
34. 34 Chrysikou, E.G., et al. Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cogn. Neurosci. 4 (2013), 81–89.
35. 35 Rabbitt, P., An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. J. Gerontol. 20 (1965), 233–238.
36. 36 Tsvetanov, K.A., et al. Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75 (2013), 1382–1394.
37. 37 Campbell, K.L., et al. Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: implications for distractibility. Neuropsychologia 50 (2012), 2212–2223.
38. 38 Chadick, J.Z., et al. Structural and functional differences in medial prefrontal cortex underlie distractibility and suppression deficits in ageing. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 4223.
39. 39 Schmitz, T.W., et al. Failing to ignore: paradoxical neural effects of perceptual load on early attentional selection in normal aging. J. Neurosci. 30 (2010), 14750–14758.
40. 40 Fisher, A.V., Visual environment, attention allocation, and learning in young children: when too much of a good thing may be bad. Psychol. Sci. 25 (2014), 1362–1370.
41. 41 Rowe, G., et al. Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory. Psychol. Aging 21 (2006), 826–830.
42. 42 Amer, T., Hasher, L., Conceptual processing of distractors by older but not younger adults. Psychol. Sci. 25 (2014), 2252–2258.
43. 43 Biss, R.K., et al. Distraction can reduce age-related forgetting. Psychol. Sci. 24 (2013), 448–455.
44. 44 Weeks, J.C., et al. Face–name learning in older adults: a benefit of hyper-binding. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23 (2016), 1559–1565.
45. 45 Campbell, K.L., et al. Hyper-binding: a unique age effect. Psychol. Sci. 21 (2010), 399–405.
46. 46 James, T., et al. Age-related deficits in selective attention during encoding increase demands on episodic reconstruction during context retrieval: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 86 (2016), 66–79.
47. 47 Campbell, K.L., et al. Hyper-binding across time: age differences in the effect of temporal proximity on paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 40 (2014), 293–299.
48. 48 Schwab, J.F., et al. Aging and the statistical learning of grammatical form classes. Psychol. Aging 31 (2016), 481–487.
49. 49 Campbell, K.L., et al. Age differences in visual statistical learning. Psychol. Aging 27 (2012), 650–656.
50. 50 Griffiths, T.L., Tenenbaum, J.B., Structure and strength in causal induction. Cogn. Psychol. 51 (2005), 334–384.
51. 51 Lucas, C.G., et al. When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition 131 (2014), 284–299.
52. 52 Worthy, D.A., et al. With age comes wisdom: decision making in younger and older adults. Psychol. Sci. 22 (2011), 1375–1380.
53. 53 Li, Y., et al. Complementary cognitive capabilities, economic decision making, and aging. Psychol. Aging 28 (2013), 595–613.
54. 54 Li, Y., et al. Sound credit scores and financial decisions despite cognitive aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 65–69.
55. 55 Worthy, D.A., et al. Neural correlates of state-based decision-making in younger and older adults. Neuroimage 130 (2016), 13–23.
56. 56 Wiley, J., Jarosz, A.F., Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21 (2012), 258–262.
57. 57 Limb, C.J., Braun, A.R., Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3, 2008, e1679.
58. 58 Reverberi, C., et al. Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. Brain 128 (2005), 2882–2890.
59. 59 Seeley, W.W., et al. Unravelling bolero: progressive aphasia, transmodal creativity and the right posterior neocortex. Brain 131 (2008), 39–49.
60. 60 Leon, S.A., et al. Divergent task performance in older adults: declarative memory or creative potential?. Creat. Res. J. 26 (2014), 21–29.
61. 61 May, C.P., Synchrony effects in cognition: the costs and a benefit. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 6 (1999), 142–147.
62. 62 Kim, S., et al. Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14 (2007), 301–305.
63. 63 Ansburg, P.I., Hill, K., Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Pers. Individ. Dif. 34 (2003), 1141–1152.
64. 64 Carson, S.H., et al. Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85 (2003), 499–506.
65. 65 Ellamil, M., et al. Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage 59 (2012), 1783–1794.
66. 66 Beaty, R.E., et al. Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 (2016), 87–95.
67. 67 Raichle, M.E., et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001), 676–682.
68. 68 Vincent, J.L., et al. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 100 (2008), 3328–3342.
69. 69 Spreng, R.N., Schacter, D.L., Default network modulation and large-scale network interactivity in healthy young and old adults. Cereb. Cortex 22 (2012), 2610–2621.
70. 70 Turner, G.R., Spreng, R.N., Prefrontal engagement and reduced default network suppression co-occur and are dynamically coupled in older adults: the default–executive coupling hypothesis of aging. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27 (2015), 2462–2476.
71. 71 Madore, K.P., et al. Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction. Mem. Cognit. 44 (2016), 974–988.
72. 72 Campbell, D.T., Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol. Rev. 67 (1960), 380–400.
73. 73 Weisberg, R., Creativity: Genius and Other Myths. 1986, WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
74. 74 Gabora, L., Revenge of the ‘neurds’: characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creat. Res. J. 22 (2010), 1–13.
75. 75 May, C.P., et al. Implicit memory, age, and time of day – paradoxical priming effects. Psychol. Sci. 16 (2005), 96–100.
76. 76 Yoon, C., et al. Aging, circadian arousal patterns, and cognition. Schwarz, N., et al. (eds.) Aging, Cognition and Self Reports, 1999, Psychological Press, 117–143.
77. 77 Wieth, M.B., Zacks, R.T., Time of day effects on problem solving: when the non-optimal is optimal. Think. Reason. 17 (2011), 387–401.
78. 78 Anderson, J.A.E., et al. Timing is everything: age differences in the cognitive control network are modulated by time of day. Psychol. Aging 29 (2014), 648–657.
79. 79 Fredrickson, B.L., Branigan, C., Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought–action repertoires. Cogn. Emot. 19 (2005), 313–332.
80. 80 Biss, R.K., Hasher, L., Delighted and distracted: positive affect increases priming for irrelevant information. Emotion 11 (2011), 1474–1478.
81. 81 Jarosz, A.F., et al. Uncorking the muse: alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Conscious. Cogn. 21 (2012), 487–493.
82. 82 Colflesh, G.J.H., Wiley, J., Drunk, but not blind: the effects of alcohol intoxication on change blindness. Conscious. Cogn. 22 (2013), 231–236.
83. 83 Chun, M.M., Jiang, Y., Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn. Psychol. 36 (1998), 28–71.
84. 84 Chun, M.M., Jiang, Y., Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 29 (2003), 224–234.
85. 85 Sedlmeier, P., From associations to intuitive judgment and decision making: implicitly learning from experience. Tilmann, B., Haberstroh, S., (eds.) The Routines of Decision Making, 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83–99.
86. 86 Grossmann, I., et al. Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 7246–7250.
87. 87 Craik, F.I., Salthouse, T.A., The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. 2011, Psychology Press.
88. 88 Grady, C., The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13 (2012), 491–505.
89. 89 Lustig, C., Jantz, T., Questions of age differences in interference control: when and how, not if?. Brain Res. 1612 (2015), 59–69.
90. 90 Salthouse, T., Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63 (2012), 201–226.
91. 91 Gonzales, E., et al. Increasing opportunities for the productive engagement of older adults: a response to population aging. Gerontologist 55 (2015), 252–261.
92. 92 Jaeggi, S.M., et al. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 6829–6833.
93. 93 Klingberg, T., Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14 (2010), 317–324.
94. 94 Owen, A.M., et al. Putting brain training to the test. Nature, 465, 2010, 775.
95. 95 Shipstead, Z., et al. Is working memory training effective?. Psychol. Bull. 138 (2012), 628–654.
96. 96 Redick, T.S., et al. No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142 (2013), 359–379.
97. 97 von Bastian, C.C., Eschen, A., Does working memory training have to be adaptive?. Psychol. Res. 80 (2016), 181–194.
98. 98 Lampit, A., et al. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. Plos Med., 11, 2014, e1001756.
99. 99 Ballesteros, S., et al. A randomized controlled trial of brain training with non-action video games in older adults: results of the 3-month follow-up. Front. Aging Neurosci., 7, 2015, 45.
100. 100 Salthouse, T.A., Do cognitive interventions alter the rate of age-related cognitive change?. Intelligence 53 (2015), 86–91.
101. 101 Thomas, R.C., Hasher, L., Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 38 (2012), 30–39.
102. 102 Naveh-Benjamin, M., et al. The associative memory deficit of older adults: further support using face-name associations. Psychol. Aging 19 (2004), 541–546.
103. 103 Boyle, P.A., et al. Poor decision making is a consequence of cognitive decline among older persons without Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e43647.
104. 104 Boyle, P.A., et al. Cognitive decline impairs financial and health literacy among community-based older persons without dementia. Psychol. Aging 28 (2013), 614–624.
105. 105 Henninger, D.E., et al. Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making. Psychol. Aging 25 (2010), 262–270.
106. 106 Frey, R., et al. The role of cognitive abilities in decisions from experience: age differences emerge as a function of choice set size. Cognition 142 (2015), 60–80.
107. 107 Samanez-Larkin, G.R., Knutson, B., Decision making in the ageing brain: changes in affective and motivational circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16 (2015), 278–289.
108. 108 Loeckenhoff, C.E., et al. Age differences in temporal discounting: the role of dispositional affect and anticipated emotions. Psychol. Aging 26 (2011), 274–284.
109. 109 Samanez-Larkin, G.R., et al. Age differences in striatal delay sensitivity during intertemporal choice in healthy adults. Front. Neurosci., 5, 2011, 126.
110. 110 Eppinger, B., et al. Reduced sensitivity to immediate reward during decision-making in older than younger adults. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e36953.
111. 111 Strough, J., et al. Are older adults less subject to the sunk-cost fallacy than younger adults?. Psychol. Sci. 19 (2008), 650–652.
112. 112 de Bruin, W.B., et al. Getting older isn't all that bad: better decisions and coping when facing ‘sunk costs’. Psychol. Aging 29 (2014), 642–647.