Age-related deficits in selective attention during encoding increase demands on episodic reconstruction during context retrieval: An ERP study

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 86, Issue , 2016, Pages 66-79

  James, Taylor ^a   Strunk, Jonathan ^a   Arndt, Jason ^b   Duarte, Audrey ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Attention; Context memory; ERPs; LPN; Retrieval

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHEMICAL BINDING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEMORY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; ADOLESCENT; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; VERY ELDERLY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84963945128     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ally B.A., Waring J.D., Beth E.H., McKeever J.D., Milberg W.P., Budson A.E. Aging memory for pictures: using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:679-689.
2. Benton, A.L., Hamsher, K., Sivan, A.B., 1994. Multilingual Aphasia Examination.
3. Campbell K.L., Hasher L., Thomas R.C. Hyper-binding: a unique age effect. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:399-405.
4. Campbell K.L., Trelle A., Hasher L. Hyper-binding across time: age differences in the effect of temporal proximity on paired-associate learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2014, 40:293-299.
5. Cansino S., Hernandez-Ramos E., Trejo-Morales P. Neural correlates of source memory retrieval in young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Biol. Psychol. 2012, 90:33-49.
6. Cohn M., Emrich S.M., Moscovitch M. Age-related deficits in associative memory: the influence of impaired strategic retrieval. Psychol. Aging 2008, 23:93-103.
7. Cruse D., Wilding E.L. Prefrontal cortex contributions to episodic retrieval monitoring and evaluation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2779-2789.
8. Curran T. Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Mem. Cognit. 2000, 28:923-938.
9. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D., Snodgrass J.G. Remembering the color of objects: an ERP investigation of source memory. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11:322-334.
10. Davidson P.S., Glisky E.L. Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2002, 2:174-186.
11. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
12. Dodson C.S., Holland P.W., Shimamura A.P. On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 1998, 24:1121-1136.
13. Duarte A., Henson R.N., Graham K.S. The effects of aging on the neural correlates of subjective and objective recollection. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2169-2180.
14. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Trujillo C., Knight R.T. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2006, 18:33-47.
15. Duarte A., Ranganath C., Winward L., Hayward D., Knight R.T. Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 18:255-272.
16. Dulas M.R., Duarte A. The effects of aging on material-independent and material-dependent neural correlates of contextual binding. Neuroimage 2011, 57:1192-1204.
17. Dulas M.R., Duarte A. The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: an ERP study. Brain Res. 2013, 1500:55-71.
18. Dulas M.R., Duarte A. Aging affects the interaction between attentional control and source memory: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2014, 26:2653-2669.
19. Dulas M.R., Newsome R.N., Duarte A. The effects of aging on ERP correlates of source memory retrieval for self-referential information. Brain Res. 2011, 1377:84-100.
20. Dunn J.C. Remember-know: a matter of confidence. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 111:524-542.
21. Ecker U.K., Maybery M., Zimmer H.D. Binding of intrinsic and extrinsic features in working memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2013, 142:218-234.
22. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Bersick M. The late negative episodic memory effect: the effect of recapitulating study details at test. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 23:185-198.
23. Friedman D., Johnson R. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2000, 51:6-28.
24. Glisky E.L., Kong L.L. Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2008, 34:809-822.
25. Glisky E.L., Rubin S.R., Davidson P.S. Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem?. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2001, 27:1131-1146.
26. Gutchess A.H., Ieuji Y., Federmeier K.D. Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1089-1103.
27. Hasher L., Zacks R. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1988, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. G. Bower (Ed.).
28. Hashtroudi S., Johnson M.K., Vnek N., Ferguson S.A. Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall. Psychol. Aging 1994, 9:160-170.
29. Healey M.K., Campbell K.L., Hasher L. Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits. Prog. Brain Res. 2008, 169:353-363.
30. Herron J.E. Decomposition of the ERP late posterior negativity: effects of retrieval and response fluency. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:233-244.
31. Johansson M., Mecklinger A. The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 64:91-117.
32. Kuo T.Y., Van Petten C. Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1133-1146.
33. Leshikar E.D., Dulas M.R., Duarte A. Self-referencing enhances recollection in both young and older adults. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B: Aging Neuropsychol. Cognit. 2014, 1-25.
34. Li J., Morcom A.M., Rugg M.D. The effects of age on the neural correlates of successful episodic retrieval: an ERP study. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:279-293.
35. Logan J.M., Sanders A.L., Snyder A.Z., Morris J.C., Buckner R.L. Under-recruitment and nonselective recruitment: dissociable neural mechanisms associated with aging. Neuron 2002, 33:827-840.
36. Lopez-Calderon J., Luck S.J. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:213.
37. Mark R.E., Rugg M.D. Age effects on brain activity associated with episodic memory retrieval. An electrophysiological study. Brain 1998, 121:861-873.
38. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 62:203-208.
39. McDonough I.M., Cervantes S.N., Gray S.J., Gallo D.A. Memory's aging echo: age-related decline in neural reactivation of perceptual details during recollection. Neuroimage 2014, 98:346-358.
40. Mecklinger A., Johansson M., Parra M., Hanslmayr S. Source-retrieval requirements influence late ERP and EEG memory effects. Brain Res. 2007, 1172:110-123.
41. Meiser T., Broder A. Memory for multidimensional source information. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2002, 28:116-137.
42. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K. Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?. Psychol. Bull. 2009, 135:638-677.
43. Mollison M.V., Curran T. Familiarity in source memory. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:2546-2565.
44. Moscovitch M. Memory and working-with-memory: a component process model based on modules and central systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1992, 4:257-267.
45. Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bedirian V., Charbonneau S., Whitehead V., Collin I., Cummings J.L., Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53:695-699.
46. Naveh-Benjamin M., Brav T.K., Levy O. The associative memory deficit of older adults: the role of strategy utilization. Psychol. Aging 2007, 22:202-208.
47. Nessler D., Johnson R., Bersick M., Friedman D. Age-related ERP differences at retrieval persist despite age-invariant performance and left-frontal negativity during encoding. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 432:151-156.
48. Nuwer M.R., Comi G., Emerson R., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A., Guerit J.M., Hinrichs H., Ikeda A., Luccas F.J., Rappelsburger P. IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 106:259-261.
49. Parks C.M. The role of noncriterial recollection in estimating recollection and familiarity. J. Mem. Lang. 2007, 57:81-1000.
50. Qin J., Raye C.L., Johnson M.K., Mitchell K.J. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999). J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2001, 27:1110-1115.
51. Quamme J.R., Frederick C., Kroll N.E., Yonelinas A.P., Dobbins I.G. Recognition memory for source and occurrence: the importance of recollection. Mem. Cognit. 2002, 30:893-907.
52. Reitan R., Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Therapy and Clinical assessment 1985, Neuropsychological Press, Tucson, AZ.
53. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Cappell K.A. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 17:177-182.
54. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:251-257.
55. Rugg M.D., Morcom A.M. The relationship between brain activity, cognitive performance and aging: the case of memory. Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging 2005, 132-154. Oxford University Press, Oxford. R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, D.C. Park (Eds.).
56. Senkfor A.J., Van Petten C. Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1998, 24:1005-1025.
57. Slotnick S.D. "Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process. Memory 2010, 18:27-39.
58. Slotnick S.D., Dodson C.S. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem. Cogn. 2005, 33:151-170.
59. Snodgrass J., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J. Exp. Psychol. 1988, 116:34-50.
60. Spencer W.D., Raz N. Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 1995, 10:527-539.
61. Swick D., Senkfor A.J., Van Petten C. Source memory retrieval is affected by aging and prefrontal lesions: behavioral and ERP evidence. Brain Res. 2006, 1107:161-176.
62. Trott C.T., Friedman D., Ritter W., Fabiani M. Item and source memory: differential age effects revealed by event-related potentials. Neuroreport 1997, 8:3373-3378.
63. Trott C.T., Friedman D., Ritter W., Fabiani M., Snodgrass J.G. Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychol. Aging 1999, 14:390-413.
64. Uncapher M.R., Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. Episodic encoding is more than the sum of its parts: an fMRI investigation of multifeatural contextual encoding. Neuron 2006, 52:547-556.
65. Vilberg K.L., Moosavi R.F., Rugg M.D. The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Res. 2006, 1122:161-170.
66. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1787-1799.
67. Voss J.L., Lucas H.D., Paller K.A. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 22:2638-2651.
68. Wang T.H., de Chastelaine M., Minton B., Rugg M.D. Effects of age on the neural correlates of familiarity as indexed by ERPs. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24:1055-1068.
69. Wang Y., West J.D., Flashman L.A., Wishart H.A., Santulli R.B., Rabin L.A., Pare N., Arfanakis K., Saykin A.J. Selective changes in white matter integrity in MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1822:423-430.
70. Wegesin D.J., Friedman D., Varughese N., Stern Y. Age-related changes in source memory retrieval: an ERP replication and extension. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 13:323-338.
71. Wilding E.L. Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: an event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:441-454.
72. Wilding E.L. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 35:81-87.
73. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 1996, 119:889-905.
74. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1185-1195.
75. Williams, J., 1991. Memory Assessment Scales professional Manual.
76. Wolk D.A., Sen N.M., Chong H., Riis J.L., McGinnis S.M., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R. ERP correlates of item recognition memory: effects of age and performance. Brain Res. 2009, 1250:218-231.
77. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. Noncriterial recollection: familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Conscious. Cognit. 1996, 5:131-141.
78. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133:800-832.