Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: Implications for distractibility

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2212-2223

  Campbell, Karen L ^a,b   Grady, Cheryl L ^a,b   Ng, Charisa ^a   Hasher, Lynn ^a,b  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aging; Attention; Cognitive control; Distraction; Frontoparietal network; Functional connectivity; Implicit memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARIETAL LOBE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863858275     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L. Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychology and Aging 1999, 14:507-519.
2. Andrews-Hanna J.R., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Lustig C., Head D., Raichle M.E., Buckner R.L. Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron 2007, 56:924-935.
3. Badre D. Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:193-200.
4. Buckner R.L., Andrews-Hanna J.R., Schacter D.L. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008, 1124:1-38.
5. Buckner R.L., Sepulcre J., Talukdar T., Krienen F.M., Liu H., Hedden T., Andrews-Hanna J.R., Sperling R.A., Johnson K.A. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:1860-1873.
6. Burgess P.W., Dumontheil I., Gilbert S.J. The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:290-298.
7. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:613-625.
8. Cabeza R., Grady C.L., Nyberg L., McIntosh A.R., Tulving E., Kapur S., Jennings J.M., Houle Sl., Craik F.I.M. Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: a positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:391-400.
9. Campbell K.L., Hasher L., Thomas R.C. Hyper-binding: a unique age effect. Psychological Science 2010, 21:399-405.
10. Carp J., Gmeindl L., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Age differences in the neural representations of working memory revealed by multi-voxel pattern analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:217.
11. Chao L.L., Knight R.T. Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. Cerebral Cortex 1997, 7:63-69.
12. Chen N., Chou Y., Song A.W., Madden D.J. Measurement of spontaneous signal fluctuations in fMRI: adult age differences in intrinsic functional connectivity. Brain Structure and Function 2009, 213:571-585.
13. Christoff K., Gabrieli J.D.E. The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex. Psychobiology 2000, 28:168-186.
14. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
15. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computational Biomedical Research 1996, 29:162-173.
16. Daselaar S.M., Fleck M.S., Dobbins I.G., Madden D.J., Cabeza R. Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1771-1782.
17. Davachi L., Maril A., Wagner A.D. When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:1059-1070.
18. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
19. Efron B. Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jackknife, the bootstrap, and other methods. Biometrika 1981, 68:589-599.
20. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
21. Esposito F., Aragri A., Pesaresi I., Cirillo S., Tedeschi G., Marciano E., Goebel R., Di Salle F. Independent component model of the default-mode brain function: combining individual-level and population-level analyses in resting-state fMRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2008, 26:905-913.
22. Fabiani M., Low K.A., Wee E., Sable J.J., Gratton G. Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:637-650.
23. Fiez J.A., Petersen S.E. Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:914-921.
24. Fletcher P.C., Dolan R.J., Shallice, Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J., Friston K.J. Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach?. Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval. Neuroimage 1996, 3:209-215.
25. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. "Mini Mental State"-a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198.
26. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:9673-9678.
27. Garrett D.D., Kovacevic N., McIntosh A.R., Grady C.L. The importance of being variable. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:4496-4503.
28. Gazzaley A. Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory. Neuropsycholgia 2011, 49:1410-1424.
29. Gazzaley A., Cooney J.W., Rissman J., D'Esposito M. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1298-1300.
30. Ghosh A., Rho Y., McIntosh A.R., Kotter R., Jirsa V.K. Cortical network dynamics with time delays reveals functional connectivity in the resting brain. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2008, 2:115-120.
31. Grady C.L., Maisog J.M., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Mentis M.J., Salerno J.A., Pietrini P., Wagner E., Haxby J.V. Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location. Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14:1450-1462.
32. Grady C.L., McIntosh A.R., Craik F.I. Age-Related differences in the functional connectivity of the hippocampus during memory encoding. Hippocampus 2003, 13:572-586.
33. Grady C.L., Protzner A.B., Kovacevic N., Strother S.C., Afshin-Pour B., Wojtowicz M.A., Anderson J.A.E., Churchill N., McIntosh A.R. A multivariate analysis of age-related differences in default mode and task positive networks across multiple cognitive domains. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:1432-1447.
34. Grigg O., Grady C.L. Task-related effects on the temporal and spatial dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in the default network. PLoS One 2010, 5(10):e13311.
35. Grigg O., Grady C.L. The default network and processing of personally relevant information: converging evidence from task-related modulations and functional connectivity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3815-3823.
36. Greicius M., Supekar K.S., Menon V., Dougherty R.F. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:72-78.
37. Hamm V.P., Hasher L. Age and the availability of inferences. Psychology and Aging 1992, 7:56-64.
38. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1988, 22:193-225. Academic Press, New York, NY.
39. Hasher L., Zacks R.T., May C.P. Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. Attention and Performance XVII 1999, 653-675. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gopher, A. Koriat (Eds.).
40. Healey M.K., Campbell K.L., Hasher L. Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits. Progress in Brain Research 2008, 169:353-363. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
41. Hedden T., Van Dijk K.R.A., Shire E.H., Sperling R.A., Johnson K.A., Buckner R.L. Failure to modulate attentional control in advanced aging linked to white matter pathology. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 10.1093/cercor/bhr172.
42. Kahneman D., Chajczyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 94:497-509.
43. Kastner S., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:315-341.
44. Kim S., Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:301-305.
45. Koechlin E., Basso G., Pietrini P., Panzer S., Grafman J. The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 1999, 399:148-151.
46. La Voie D., Light L.L. Adult age differences in repetition priming: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 1994, 9:539-553.
47. Lukic A.S., Wernick M.N., Strother S.C. An evaluation of methods for detecting brain activations from functional neuroimages. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2002, 25:69-88.
48. Lustig C., Hasher L., Tonev S.T. Distraction as a determinant of processing speed. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:619-625.
49. Lustig C., Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Inhibitory deficit theory: recent developments in a "new view". The Place of Inhibition in Cognition 2007, 145-162. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. D.S. Gorfein, C.M. MacLeod (Eds.).
50. Madden D.J., Costello M.C., Dennis N.A., Davis S.W., Shepler A.M., Spaniol J., Bucur B., Cabeza R. Adult age differences in functional connectivity during executive control. Neuroimage 2010, 52:643-657.
51. Martin R.C. Language processing: functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:55-89.
52. Mattay V.S., Fera F., Tessitore A., Hariri A.R., Berman K.F., Das S., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Goldberg T.E., Callicott J.H., Weinberger D.R. Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 392:32-37.
53. McIntosh A.R., Bookstein F.L., Haxby J.V., Grady C.L. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage 1996, 3:143-157.
54. McIntosh A.R., Chau W.K., Protzner A.B. Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI data using partial least squares. NeuroImage 2004, 23:764-775.
55. Nagel I.E., Preuschhof C., Li S.-C., Nyberg L., Backman L., Lindenberger U., Heekeren H.R. Performance level modulates adult age differences in brain activation during spatial working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:22552-22557.
56. Nagel I.E., Preuschhof C., Li S.-C., Nyberg L., Backman L., Lindenberger U., Heekeren H.R. Load modulation of BOLD response and connectivity predicts working memory performance in younger and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:2030-2045.
57. Nelson J.K., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Sylvester C.C., Jonides J., Smith E.E. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:11171-11175.
58. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 15:1-25.
59. Park D.C., Polk T.A., Park R., Minear M., Savage A., Smith M.R. Aging reduced neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:13091-13095.
60. Protzner A.B., McIntosh A.R. The interplay of stimulus modality and response latency in neural network organization for simple working memory tasks. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:3187-3197.
61. Rabbitt P.M.A. An age deficit in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. Journal of Gerontology 1965, 20:233-238.
62. Raichle M.E., MacLeod A.M., Snyder A.Z., Powers W.J., Gusnard D.A., Shulman G.L. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:676-682.
63. Rees G., Russell C., Frith C.D., Driver J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 1999, 286:2504-2507.
64. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Cappell K.A. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:177-182.
65. Rowe G., Valderrama S., Hasher L., Lenartowicz A. Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory. Psychology and Aging 2006, 21:826-830.
66. Schmitz T.W., Cheng F.H.T., De Rosa E. Failing to ignore: paradoxical neural effects of perceptual load on early attentional selection in normal aging. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:14750-14758.
67. Seeley W.W., Menon V., Schatzberg A.F., Keller J., Glover G.H., Kenna H., Reiss A.L., Greicius M.D. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:2349-2356.
68. Shivde G., Thompson-Schill S.L. Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4:10-19.
69. Shipley W.C. Institute of Living Scale 1946, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.
70. Smith E.E., Jonides J., Marshuetz C., Koeppe R.A. Components of verbal working memory: evidence from neuroimaging. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:876-882.
71. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. Norms for picture stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:205-210.
72. Spreng R.N., Stevens W.D., Chamberlain J.P., Gilmore A.W., Schacter D.L. Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition. NeuroImage 2010, 53:303-317.
73. Stevens W.D., Hasher L., Chiew K.S., Grady C.L. A neural mechanism underlying memory failure in older adults. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:12820-12824.
74. Thomas R.C., Hasher L. Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. Advance online publication 2011, 10.1037/a0024882.
75. Toro R., Fox P.T., Paus T. Functional coactivation map of the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:2553-2559.
76. Vincent J.L., Kahn I., Snyder A.Z., Raichle M.E., Buckner R.L. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 100:3328-3342.
77. Vogel E.K., McCollough A.W., Machizawa M.G. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature 2005, 438:500-503.