European derived Saccharomyces cerevisiae colonisation of New Zealand vineyards aided by humans

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Gayevskiy, Velimir ^a   Lee, Soon ^a   Goddard, Matthew R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genomics; Phylogenomics; Population genetics; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Yeast

Indexed keywords

FOREST; GENOME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROORGANISM; NEW ZEALAND; NEW ZEALANDER; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENOMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; RADIATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VINEYARD; AGRICULTURAL LAND; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; VITIS;

FARMS; GENOME, FUNGAL; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VITIS;

EID: 84994750505     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fow091     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aa E, Townsend JP, Adams RI et al. Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006;6:702-15.
2. Almeida P, Barbosa R, Zalar P et al. A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Mol Ecol 2015;24:5412-27.
3. Almeida P, Gonçalves C, Teixeira S et al. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat Commun 2014;5:4044.
4. Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2012. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham. ac.uk/projects/fastqc/(15 October 2016, date last accessed).
5. Avise J, Arnold J, Ball R et al. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1987;18:489-522.
6. Barbosa R, Almeida P, Safar SVB et al. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol Evol 2016;8:317-29.
7. Beheregaray LB. Twenty years of phylogeography: the state of the field and the challenges for the Southern Hemisphere. Mol Ecol 2008;17:3754-74.
8. Bergstrom A, Simpson JT, Salinas F et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2014;31:872-88.
9. Buser CC, Newcomb RD, Gaskett AC et al. Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions. Ecol Lett 2014;17:1257-64.
10. Cherry JM, Hong EL, Amundsen C et al. Saccharomyces genome database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;40:D700-5.
11. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL et al. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 2013;3:2163-71.
12. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR et al. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004;14:1394-403.
13. deWit R, Bouvier T. "Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects;" what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? Environ Microbiol 2006;8:755-8.
14. del Campo J, Sieracki ME, Molestina R et al. The others: our biased perspective of eukaryotic genomes. Trends Ecol Evol 2014;29:252-9.
15. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6: 361-75.
16. Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 2002;418: 700-7.
17. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ et al. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence Penny D, ed. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e88.
18. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 2007;7:214-8.
19. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 2011;4:359-61.
20. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 2005;14:2611-20.
21. Fay JC, Benavides JA. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2005;1: 66-71.
22. Gayevskiy V, Goddard MR. Geographic delineations of yeast communities and populations associated with vines and wines in New Zealand. ISME J 2012;6:1281-90.
23. Gayevskiy V, Goddard MR. Saccharomyces eubayanus and Saccharomyces arboricola reside in North Island native New Zealand forests. Environ Microbiol 2016;18:1137-47.
24. Gayevskiy V, Klaere S, Knight S et al. ObStruct: a method to objectively analyse factors driving population structure using Bayesian ancestry profiles Pajewski NM, ed. PLoS One 2014;9:e85196.
25. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R et al. A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol 2010;12:63-73.
26. Goddard MR, Greig D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res 2015;15:fov009.
27. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H et al. Life with 6000 Genes. Science 1996;274:546-67.
28. Hanson CA, Fuhrman JA, Horner-DevineMC et al. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping themicrobial landscape. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:497-506.
29. Hittinger CT. Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus. Trends Genet 2013;29:309-17.
30. Huang C, Roncoroni M, Gardner RC. MET2 affects production of hydrogen sulfide during wine fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biot 2014;98:7125-35.
31. Hurles ME, Matisoo-Smith E, Gray RD. Untangling Oceanic settlement: the edge of the knowable. Trends Ecol Evol 2003;18: 531-40.
32. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 2006;23:254-67.
33. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1647-9.
34. Knight S, Goddard MR. Quantifying separation and similarity in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae metapopulation. ISME J 2015;9:361-70.
35. Knight S, Klaere S, Fedrizzi B et al. Regional microbial signatures positively correlate with differential wine phenotypes: evidence for a microbial aspect to terroir. Sci Rep 2015;5: 14233.
36. Lang GI, Murray AW. Estimating the per-base-pairmutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008;178:67-82.
37. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-9.
38. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP et al. ClustalWand Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2947-8.
39. Legras J-L, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J-M et al. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 2007;16:2091-102.
40. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al. Subgroup 1GPDP. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078-9.
41. Litchman E. Invisible invaders: non-pathogenic invasive microbes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 2010;13:1560-72.
42. Liti G, Barton DBH, Louis EJ. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 2006;174:839-50.
43. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009;458:337-41.
44. Lohse M, Bolger AM, Nagel A et al. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W622-7.
45. Ludlow CL, Cromie GA, Garmendia-Torres C et al. Independent origins of yeast associated with coffee and cacao fermentation. Curr Biol 2016;26:965-71.
46. McGovern PE, Zhang J, Tang J et al. Fermented beverages of pre-and proto-historic China. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101: 17593-8.
47. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. 2014. http://mesquiteproject.org (15 October 2016, date last accessed).
48. Magwene PM, Kayikci O, Granek JA et al. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:1987-92.
49. Martiny JBH, Bohannan BJM, Brown JH et al. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006;4:102-12.
50. Mazzaglia A, Studholme DJ, Taratufolo MC et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (PSA) isolates from recent bacterial canker of kiwifruit outbreaks belong to the same genetic lineage. PLoS One 2012;7:e36518.
51. Morrison-Whittle P, Goddard MR. Quantifying the relative roles of selective and neutral processes in defining eukaryotic microbial communities. ISME J 2015;9:1-9.
52. Nielsen R, Korneliussen T, Albrechtsen A et al. SNP calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from new-generation sequencing data. PLoS One 2012;7: e37558.
53. Norton D. Species invasions and the limits to restoration: learning from the New Zealand experience. Science 2009;325: 569-71.
54. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E et al. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:16333-8.
55. Pedrós-Alió C. Marine microbial diversity: can it be determined? Trends Microbiol 2006;14:257-63.
56. Peter J, Schacherer J. Population genomics of yeasts: towards a comprehensive view across a broad evolutionary scale. Yeast 2016;33:73-81.
57. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S et al. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 2006;22:183-6.
58. Pretorius IS. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 2000;16:675-729.
59. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000;155:945-59.
60. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2011. http://www.R-project.org/(15 October 2016, date last accessed).
61. Richards KD, Goddard MR, Gardner RC. A database of microsatellite genotypes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Anton Leeuw 2009;96:355-9.
62. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003;425:798-804.
63. Scannell DR, Zill OA, Rokas A et al. The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 2011;1:11-25.
64. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, RuderferDM, et al. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2009;458:342-5.
65. Serjeant K, Tang R, Anfang N et al. Yeasts associated with the New Zealand Nothofagus honeydew system. New Zeal J Ecol 2008;32:209-13.
66. Skelly DA, Merrihew GE, Riffle M et al. Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast. Genome Res 2013;23:1496-504.
67. Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras J-L et al. Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. P Nat Acad Sci USA 2012;109:13398-403.
68. Strope PK, Skelly DA, Kozmin SG et al. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res 2015;25:762-74.
69. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutralmutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989;123:585-95.
70. Talbot JM, Bruns TD, Taylor JW et al. Endemism and functional convergence across the North American soil mycobiome. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:6341-6.
71. Taylor MW, Tsai P, Anfang N et al. Pyrosequencing reveals regional differences in fruit-associated fungal communities. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:2848-58.
72. This P, Lacombe T, Thomas MR. Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends Genet 2006;22:511-9.
73. Tripathi BM, Lee-Cruz L, Kim M et al. Spatial scaling effects on soil bacterial communities in Malaysian tropical forests. Microb Ecol 2014;68:247-58.
74. Valverde A, Tuffin M, Cowan DA. Biogeography of bacterial communities in hot springs: a focus on the actinobacteria. Extremophiles 2012;16:669-79.
75. Wallis GP, Trewick SA. New Zealand phylogeography: evolution on a small continent. Mol Ecol 2009;18:3548-80.
76. Wang Q-M, Liu W-Q, Liti G et al. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 2012;21: 5404-17.
77. Watterson GA. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 1975;7: 256-76.
78. Wichmann MC, Alexander MJ, Soons MB et al. Human-mediated dispersal of seeds over long distances. P Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 2009;276:523-32.
79. Zhang H, Skelton A, Gardner RC et al. Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reside on oak trees in New Zealand: evidence for migration from Europe and interspecies hybrids. FEMS Yeast Res 2010;10:941-7.