Nanopattern-induced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells – A systematic review

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 46, Issue , 2016, Pages 3-14

  Dobbenga, Sander ^a   Fratila Apachitei, Lidy E ^a   Zadpoor, Amir A ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells; Nanopatterns; Osteogenic differentiation

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BIOMATERIALS; CELL MEMBRANES; FLOWCHARTING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; STEM CELLS; TOPOGRAPHY;

IN-VITRO; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANO PATTERN; NANOSCALE TOPOGRAPHY; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOGENIC SUPPLEMENTS; STATE OF THE ART; STEM-CELL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CELL CULTURE;

CELL RECEPTOR; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPATTERN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NANOPARTICLE;

BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL STRUCTURE; CYTOSKELETON; FOCAL ADHESION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOFABRICATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOGENESIS; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84994718555     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.031     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. [1] Weiss, P., Nerve patterns: the mechanics of nerve growth. Growth 5 (1941), 163–203.
2. [2] Harrison, R.G., The reaction of embryonic cells to solid structures. J. Exp. Zool. 17 (1914), 521–544.
3. [3] Clark, P., Connolly, P., Curtis, A., Dow, J., Wilkinson, C., Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 99 (1991), 73–77.
4. [4] Park, S., Im, G.-I., Stem cell responses to nanotopography. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 103 (2015), 1238–1245.
5. [5] Dalby, M.J., Gadegaard, N., Oreffo, R.O., Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13 (2014), 558–569.
6. [6] Bettinger, C.J., Langer, R., Borenstein, J.T., Engineering substrate topography at the micro-and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009), 5406–5415.
7. 2 nanotubes. Nano Lett. 9 (2009), 1932–1936.
8. [8] Andalib, M.N., Lee, J.S., Ha, L., Dzenis, Y., Lim, J.Y., The role of RhoA kinase (ROCK) in cell alignment on nanofibers. Acta Biomater. 9 (2013), 7737–7745.
9. [9] Liu, D., Yi, C., Fong, C.-C., Jin, Q., Wang, Z., Yu, W.-K., Sun, D., Zhao, J., Yang, M., Activation of multiple signaling pathways during the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured in a silicon nanowire microenvironment. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 10 (2014), 1153–1163.
10. [10] Ogino, Y., Liang, R., Mendonça, D.B.S., Mendonça, G., Nagasawa, M., Koyano, K., Cooper, L.F., RhoA-mediated functions in C3H10T1/2 osteoprogenitors are substrate topography dependent. J. Cell. Physiol. 231 (2016), 568–575.
11. [11] Caplan, A., Why are MSCs therapeutic? new data: new insight. J. Pathol. 217 (2009), 318–324.
12. [12] Mashinchian, O., Turner, L.-A., Dalby, M.J., Laurent, S., Shokrgozar, M.A., Bonakdar, S., Imani, M., Mahmoudi, M., Regulation of stem cell fate by nanomaterial substrates. Nanomedicine 10 (2015), 829–847.
13. [13] Wang, N., Tytell, J.D., Ingber, D.E., Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 (2009), 75–82.
14. [14] Eyckmans, J., Boudou, T., Yu, X., Chen, C.S., A hitchhiker's guide to mechanobiology. Dev. Cell 21 (2011), 35–47.
15. [15] Crisp, M., Liu, Q., Roux, K., Rattner, J., Shanahan, C., Burke, B., Stahl, P.D., Hodzic, D., Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm role of the LINC complex. J. Cell Biol. 172 (2006), 41–53.
16. [16] Orr, A.W., Helmke, B.P., Blackman, B.R., Schwartz, M.A., Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Developmental 10 (2006), 11–20.
17. [17] Dalby, M., Riehle, M., Johnstone, H., Affrossman, S., Curtis, A., A, Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia. Cell Biol. Int. 28 (2004), 229–236.
18. [18] McNamara, L.E., Sjöström, T., Seunarine, K., Meek, R.D., Su, B., Dalby, M.J., Investigation of the limits of nanoscale filopodial interactions. J. Tissue Eng., 5, 2014 2041731414536177.
19. [19] Kaur, G., Valarmathi, M.T., Potts, J.D., Jabbari, E., Sabo-Attwood, T., Wang, Q., Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells on 2D nanorod substrates. Biomaterials 31 (2010), 1732–1741.
20. [20] de Peppo, G.M., Agheli, H., Karlsson, C., Ekstrom, K., Brisby, H., Lenneras, M., Gustafsson, S., Sjovall, P., Johansson, A., Olsson, E., Lausmaa, J., Thomsen, P., Petronis, S., Osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells to well-defined nanoscale topography in vitro. Int. J. Nanomed. 9 (2014), 2499–2515.
21. [21] Bakeine, G.J., Benedetti, L., Galli, D., Grenci, G., Pozzato, A., Prascolu, M., Tormen, M., Cusella, G., Effects of substrate nanopatterning on human osteosarcoma cells (SaOs-2) behavior. Microelectron. Eng. 87 (2010), 830–833.
22. [22] You, M.-H., Kwak, M.K., Kim, D.-H., Kim, K., Levchenko, A., Kim, D.-Y., Suh, K.-Y., Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. Biomacromolecules 11 (2010), 1856–1862.
23. [23] Dalby, M.J., Gadegaard, N., Tare, R., Andar, A., Riehle, M.O., Herzyk, P., Wilkinson, C.D., Oreffo, R.O., The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6 (2007), 997–1003.
24. [24] Tsimbouri, P.M., Murawski, K., Hamilton, G., Herzyk, P., Oreffo, R.O., Gadegaard, N., Dalby, M.J., A genomics approach in determining nanotopographical effects on MSC phenotype. Biomaterials 34 (2013), 2177–2184 K.
25. [25] Kantawong, F., Burgess, K.E., Jayawardena, K., Hart, A., Burchmore, R.J., Gadegaard, N., Oreffo, R.O., Dalby, M.J., Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. Biomaterials 40 (2009), 4723–4731.
26. [26] Wang, J.R., Ahmed, S.F., Gadegaard, N., Meek, R.M.D., Dalby, M.J., Yarwood, J.S., Nanotopology potentiates growth hormone signalling and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 24 (2014), 245–250.
27. [27] Yang, J., McNamara, L.E., Gadegaard, N., Alakpa, E.V., Burgess, K.V., Meek, R.M.D., Dalby, M.J., Nanotopographical induction of osteogenesis through adhesion, bone morphogenic protein cosignaling, and regulation of microRNAs. ACS Nano 8 (2014), 9941–9953.
28. [28] Lavenus, S., Berreur, M., Trichet, V., Pilet, P., Louarn, G., Layrolle, P., Adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium nanopores. Eur. Cell Mater. 22 (2011), 84–96.
29. [29] Sjöström, T., Dalby, M.J., Hart, A., Tare, R., Oreffo, R.O., Su, B., Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 5 (2009), 1433–1441.
30. [30] McNamara, L.E., Sjöström, T., Burgess, K.E.V., Kim, J.J.W., Liu, E., Gordonov, S., Moghe, P.V., Meek, R.M.D., Oreffo, R.O.C., Su, B., Dalby, M.J., Skeletal stem cell physiology on functionally distinct titania nanotopographies. Biomaterials 32 (2011), 7403–7410.
31. [31] Sjöström, T., McNamara, L.E., Meek, R.M.D., Dalby, M.J., Su, B., 2D and 3D nanopatterning of titanium for enhancing osteoinduction of stem cells at implant surfaces. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2 (2013), 1285–1293.
32. [32] Guvendik, S., Trabzon, L., Ramazanoglu, M., The effect of Si nano-columns in 2-D and 3-D on cellular behaviour: nanotopography-induced CaP deposition from differentiating mesenchymal stem cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 (2011), 8896–8902.
33. [33] Silverwood, R.K., Fairhurst, P.G., Sjostrom, T., Welsh, F., Sun, Y., Li, G., Yu, B., Young, P.S., Su, B., Meek, R.M.D., Dalby, M.J., Tsimbouri, P.M., Analysis of osteoclastogenesis/osteoblastogenesis on nanotopographical titania surfaces. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 5 (2016), 947–955.
34. [34] Oakes, P.W., Gardel, M.L., Stressing the limits of focal adhesion mechanosensitivity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30 (2014), 68–73.
35. [35] Ingber, D.E., Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003), 1157–1173.
36. [36] Dalby, M.J., Biggs, M.J., Gadegaard, N., Kalna, G., Wilkinson, C.D., Curtis, A.S., Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J. Cell. Biochem. 100 (2007), 326–338.
37. [37] Lim, J.Y., Dreiss, A.D., Zhou, Z., Hansen, J.C., Siedlecki, C.A., Hengstebeck, R.W., Cheng, J., Winograd, N., Donahue, H.J., The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials 28 (2007), 1787–1797.
38. [38] Nikukar, H., Reid, S., Tsimbouri, P.M., Riehle, M.O., Curtis, A.S.G., Dalby, M.J., Osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells by nanoscale mechanotransduction. ACS Nano 7 (2013), 2758–2767.
39. [39] Cavalcanti-Adam, E.A., Aydin, D., Hirschfeld-Warneken, V.C., Spatz, J.P., Cell adhesion and response to synthetic nanopatterned environments by steering receptor clustering and spatial location. Hum. Front. Sci. Program (HFSP) J. 2 (2008), 276–285.
40. [40] Cavalcanti-Adam, E.A., Volberg, T., Micoulet, A., Kessler, H., Geiger, B., Spatz, J.P., Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 92 (2007), 2964–2974.
41. [41] Huang, J., Grater, S.V., Corbellini, F., Rinck, S., Bock, E., Kemkemer, R., Kessler, H., Ding, J., Spatz, J.P., Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett. 9 (2009), 1111–1116.
42. [42] Karazisis, D., Ballo, A.M., Petronos, S., Agheli, H., Emanuelsson, L., Thomsen, P., Omar, O., The role of well-defined nanotopography of titanium implants on osseointegration: cellular and molecular events in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 11 (2016), 1367–1382.
43. [43] Metavarayuth, K., Sitasuwan, P., Zhao, X., Lin, Y., Wang, Q., Influence of surface topographycal cues on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2 (2016), 142–151.
44. [44] Bhadriraju, K., Yang, M., Alom Ruiz, S., Oirone, D., Tan, J., Chen, C.S., Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell Res. 313 (2007), 3616–3623.
45. [45] McMurray, R., Gadegaard, N., Tsimbouri, P., Burgess, K., McNamara, L., Tare, R., Murawski, K., Kingham, E., Oreffo, R., Dalby, M., Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat. Mater. 10 (2011), 637–644.
46. [46] Teo, B.K., Wong, S.T., Lim, C.K., Kung, T.Y., Yap, C.H., Ramagopal, Y., Romer, L.H., Yim, E.K., Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano 7 (2013), 4785–4798.
47. [47] Dupont, S., Morsut, L., Aragona, M., Enzo, E., Giulitti, S., Cordenonsi, M., Zanconato, F., Le Digabel, J., Forcato, M., Bicciato, S., Elvassore, N., Piccolo, S., Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474 (2011), 179–183.
48. [48] Zhang, Y., Gordon, A., Weiyi, Q., Chen, W., Engineering nanoscale stem cell niche: direct stem cell behavior at cell-matrix interface. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 4 (2015), 1900–1914.
49. [49] Chen, W., Shao, Y., Li, X., Zhao, G., Fu, J., Nanotopographical surfaces for stem cell fate control: engineering mechanobiology from the bottom. Nano Today 9 (2014), 759–784.