Osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells to well-defined nanoscale topography in vitro

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 2499-2515

  de Peppo, Giuseppe Maria ^a,b,c   Agheli, Hossein ^b,c   Karlsson, Camilla ^b,c   Ekström, Karin ^b,c   Brisby, Helena ^b,c   Lennerås, Maria ^b,c   Gustafsson, Stefan ^c,d   Sjövall, Peter ^c,d,e   Johansson, Anna ^b,c   Olsson, Eva ^c,d   Lausmaa, Jukka ^c,e   Thomsen, Peter ^b,c   Petronis, Sarunas ^c,e  

^a New York Stem Cell Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Center of Biomaterials and Cell Therapy   (Sweden)

^d CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^e SP TECHNICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cell proliferation; Colloidal lithography; Human mesenchymal stem cells; Implantable materials; Mineralization; Nanotopography; Osteogenic differentiation

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PARTICLE SIZE; STEM CELL CULTURE; ABSORPTION; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; OSTEOBLAST; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ABSORPTION, PHYSICOCHEMICAL; CELLS, CULTURED; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOTOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TITANIUM;

EID: 84901424254     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S58805     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999;20(23-24):2311-2321.
2. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10 Suppl 2:S96-S101.
3. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Hattori S, Matsuoka R, Kawaguchi N. Micro and nanoscale in vitro 3D culture system for cardiac stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2010;94:1-8.
4. Ou SF, Chen CS, Hosseinkhani H, et al. Surface properties of nano-structural silicon-doped carbon films for biomedical applications. Int J Nanotechnol. 2013;10:945-958.
5. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Tian F, Kobayashi H, Tabata Y. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in self assembled-peptide amphiphile nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4079-4086.
6. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Material-tissue interfaces: the role of surface properties and processes. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102 Suppl 5: 41-45.
7. Jäger M, Zilkens C, Zanger K, Krauspe R. Significance of nano-and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2007;2007(8):69036.
8. Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein JT. Engineering substrate micro-and nanotopography to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(30):5406-5415.
9. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science. 2005;310(5751):1135-1138.
10. Curtis A. Small is beautiful but smaller is the aim: review of a life of research. Eur Cell Mater. 2004;8:27-36.
11. Patel AA, Thakar RG, Chown M, Ayala P, Desai TA, Kumar S. Biophysical mechanisms of single-cell interactions with microtopographical cues. Biomed Microdevices. 2010;12(2):287-296.
12. Hsu SH, Chen CY, Lu PS, Lai CS, Chen CJ. Oriented Schwann cell growth on microgrooved surfaces. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;92(5): 579-588.
13. Rovensky Yu A, Samoilov VI. Morphogenetic response of cultured normal and transformed fibroblasts, and epitheliocytes, to a cylindrical substratum surface. Possible role for the actin filament bundle pattern. J Cell Sci. 1994;107 Pt 5:1255-1263.
14. Rebollar E, Frischauf I, Olbrich M, et al. Proliferation of aligned mammalian cells on laser-nanostructured polystyrene. Biomaterials. 2008;29(12):1796-1806.
15. Gerecht S, Bettinger CJ, Zhang Z, Borenstein JT, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Langer R. The effect of actin disrupting agents on contact guidance of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(28):4068-4077.
16. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials. 2006;27(15): 2980-2987.
17. Curtis AS, Seehar GM. The control of cell division by tension or diffusion. Nature. 1978;274(5666):52-53.
18. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Galbraith JA. Polymerizing actin fibers position integrins primed to probe for adhesion sites. Science. 2007; 315(5814):992-995.
19. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science. 1999; 285(5430):1028-1032.
20. Blattler T, Huwiler C, Ochsner M, et al. Nanopatterns with biological functions. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6(8):2237-2264.
21. Sniadecki NJ, Desai RA, Ruiz SA, et al. Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(1):59-74.
22. Voldman J, Gray ML, Schmidt MA. Microfabrication in biology and medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;1:401-425.
23. Hanarp P, Sutherland D, Gold J, et al. Nanostructured model biomaterial surfaces prepared by colloidal lithography. Nanostruct Mater. 1999;12:429-432.
24. Agheli H, Malmström J, Hanarp P. Nanostructured biointerfaces. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26(5-7):911-917.
25. Yang SM, Jang SG, Choi DG. Nanomachining by colloidal lithography. Small. 2006;2(4):458-475.
26. Wood MA. Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications. J R Soc Interface. 2007;4(12):1-17.
27. Ballo A, Agheli H, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P, Petronis S. Nanostructured model implants for in vivo studies: influence of well-defined nanotopography on de novo bone formation on titanium implants. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:3415-3428.
28. Andersson AS, Brink J, Lidberg U, Sutherland DS. Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2003;2(2):49-57.
29. Giavaresi G, Tschon M, Daly JH, et al. In vitro and in vivo response to nanotopographically-modified surfaces of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and polycaprolactone. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(12):1405-1423.
30. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Herzyk P, et al. Group analysis of regulation of fibroblast genome on low-adhesion nanostructures. Biomaterials. 2007;28(10):1761-1769.
31. Rice JM, Hunt JA, Gallagher JA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. Biomaterials. 2003;24(26): 4799-4818.
32. Yang K, Jung K, Ko E, et al. Nanotopographical manipulation of focal adhesion formation for enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(21):10529-10540.
33. Hempel U, Hefti T, Dieter P, Schlottig F. Response of human bone marrow stromal cells, MG-63, and SaOS-2 to titanium-based dental implant surfaces with different topography and surface energy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(2):174-182.
34. Fiedler J, Ozdemir B, Bartholomä J, Plettl A, Brenner RE, Ziemann P. The effect of substrate surface nanotopography on the behavior of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2013;34(35):8851-8859.
35. Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(5): 641-650.
36. Tapp H, Hanley EN Jr, Patt JC, Gruber HE. Adipose-derived stem cells: characterization and current application in orthopaedic tissue repair. Exp Biol Med. 2009;234(1):1-9.
37. Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Mifune Y, et al. Circulating endothelial/skeletal progenitor cells for bone regeneration and healing. Bone. 2008;43(3):434-439.
38. Jager M, Zilkens C, Bittersohl B, Krauspe R. Cord blood-an alternative source for bone regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. 2009;5(3):266-277.
39. Danisovic L, Varga I, Polak S, Ulicna M, Bohmer D, Vojtassak J. Morphology of in vitro expanded human muscle-derived stem cells. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2008;152(2): 235-238.
40. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411): 143-147.
41. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(4):329-345.
42. Liao H, Andersson AS, Sutherland D, Petronis S, Kasemo B, Thomsen P. Response of rat osteoblast-like cells to microstructured model surfaces in vitro. Biomaterials. 2003;24(4):649-654.
43. de Peppo GM, Svensson S, Lenneras M, et al. Human embryonic mesodermal progenitors highly resemble human mesenchymal stem cells and display high potential for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(7):2161-2182.
44. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-386.
45. Wenzel RN. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem. 1936;28:988-994.
46. Quéré D. Rough ideas on wetting. Physica A. 2002;313(1-2):32-46.
47. Ishino C, Okumura K. Wetting transitions on textured hydrophilic surfaces. Eur Phys J E. 2008;25(4):415-424.
48. Winograd N, Garrison BJ. Biological cluster mass spectrometry. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2010;61:305-322.
49. Wucher A. Molecular secondary ion formation under cluster bombardment: a fundamental review. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252(19): 6482-6489.
50. Palmquist A, Omar O, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7(5):515-527.
51. Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA. Principles of Bone Biology. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 1996.
52. Sela MN, Badihi L, Rosen G, Steinberg D, Kohavi D. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):630-638.
53. Sousa SR, Brás MM, Moradas-Ferreira P, Barbosa MA. Dynamics of fibronectin adsorption on TiO2 surfaces. Langmuir. 2007;23(13): 7046-7054.
54. Howlett CR, Evans MD, Walsh WR, Johnson G, Steele JG. Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell culture. Biomaterials. 1994;15(3): 213-222.
55. Berrier AL, Yamada KM. Cell-matrix adhesion. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(3):565-573.
56. Steele JG, Dalton BA, Johnson G, Underwood PA. Polystyrene chemistry affects vitronectin activity: an explanation for cell attachment to tissue culture polystyrene but not to unmodified polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27(7):927-940.
57. Sutherland DS, Broberg M, Håkan Nygren H, et al. Influence of nanoscale surface topography and chemistry on the functional behaviour of an adsorbed model macromolecule. Macromol Biosci. 2001;1(6):270-273.
58. Wood W, Martin P. Structures in focus-filopodia. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34(7):726-730.
59. Lim JY, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Runt J, Donahue HJ. Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces. J R Soc Interface. 2005;2(2):97-108.
60. Yang L, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ. The impact of diamond nanocrystallinity on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials. 2009;30(20):3458-3465.
61. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, et al. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials. 2004;25(23):5415-5422.
62. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia. Cell Biol Int. 2004;28(3):229-236.
63. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(1):21-33.
64. Malmstrom J, Christensen B, Jakobsen HP, et al. Large area protein patterning reveals nanoscale control of focal adhesion development. Nano Lett. 2010;10(2):686-694.
65. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997; 89(5):747-754.
66. Vleminckx K, Kemler R. Cadherins and tissue formation: integrating adhesion and signaling. Bioessays. 1999;21(3):211-220.
67. Kawaguchi J, Kii I, Sugiyama Y, Takeshita S, Kudo A. The transition of cadherin expression in osteoblast differentiation from mesenchymal cells: consistent expression of cadherin-11 in osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(2):260-269.
68. Donahue HJ, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT, et al. Cell-to-cell communication in osteoblastic networks: cell line-dependent hormonal regulation of gap junction function. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(6):881-889.
69. Tang J, Peng R, Ding J. The regulation of stem cell differentiation by cell-cell contact on micropatterned material surfaces. Biomaterials. 2010;31(9):2470-2476.
70. Siffert RS. The role of alkaline phosphatase in osteogenesis. J Exp Med. 1951;93(5):415-426.
71. Salomon CD. A fine structural study on the extracellular activity of alkaline phosphatase and its role in calcification. Calcif Tissue Res. 1974;15(3):201-212.
72. Malmberg P, Nygren H. Methods for the analysis of the composition of bone tissue, with a focus on imaging mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS). Proteomics. 2008;8(18):3755-3762.
73. Eriksson C, Malmberg P, Nygren H. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometric analysis of the interface between bone and titanium implants. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22(7):943-949.
74. de Peppo GM, Sjovall P, Lennerås M, et al. Osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells and human embryonic-derived mesodermal progenitors: a tissue engineering perspective. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(1-2):175-187.
75. Bigdeli N, de Peppo GM, Lenneras M, et al. Superior osteogenic capacity of human embryonic stem cells adapted to matrix-free growth compared to human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(11):3427-3240.
76. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27(15):2907-2915.
77. Brånemark R, Emanuelsson L, Palmquist A, et al. Bone response to laser-induced micro-and nano-size titanium surface features. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(2):220-227.
78. Palmquist A, Emanuelsson L, Brånemark R, et al. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro-and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011;97(2):289-298.
79. Lavenus S, Trichet V, Le Chevalier S, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2012;7(7):967-980.