A genomics approach in determining nanotopographical effects on MSC phenotype

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2177-2184

  Tsimbouri, Penelope M ^a   Murawski, Kate ^b   Hamilton, Graham ^a   Herzyk, Pawel ^a   Oreffo, Richard O C ^b,c   Gadegaard, Nikolaj ^a   Dalby, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Cell signalling; Gene expression; Mechanotransduction; Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Molecular biology; Nanotopography

Indexed keywords

AFFYMETRIX; CELL RESPONSE; CELL SIGNALLING; CELL TYPES; CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; GENOMICS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; REGULATED GENES; STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION;

CELL ADHESION; CHROMOSOMES; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENE EXPRESSION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; STEM CELLS;

CELL CULTURE;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOME 1; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LABORATORY TEST; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; TELOMERE;

BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOMICS; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE;

EID: 84872421825     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
2. McNamara L.E., Sjostrom T., Burgess K.E., Kim J.J., Liu E., Gordonov S., et al. Skeletal stem cell physiology on functionally distinct titania nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7403-7410.
3. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S.J., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2130-2135.
4. Park J.Y., Kricka L.J. Prospects for nano- and microtechnologies in clinical point-of-care testing. Lab Chip 2007, 7:547-549.
5. McMurray R.J., Gadegaard N., Tsimbouri P.M., Burgess K.V., McNamara L.E., Tare R., et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011, 10:637-644.
6. Ji L., LaPointe V.L., Evans N.D., Stevens M.M. Changes in embryonic stem cell colony morphology and early differentiation markers driven by colloidal crystal topographical cues. Eur Cell Mater 2012, 23:135-146.
7. Chen W., Villa-Diaz L.G., Sun Y., Weng S., Kim J.K., Lam R.H., et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. ACS Nano 2012, 6:4094-4103.
8. Muraglia A., Cancedda R., Quarto R. Clonal mesenchymal progenitors from human bone marrow differentiate in vitro according to a hierarchical model. J Cell Sci 2000, 113(Pt 7):1161-1166.
9. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
10. Narita Y., Yamawaki A., Kagami H., Ueda M., Ueda Y. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and ascorbic acid on differentiation of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into smooth muscle cell lineage. Cell Tissue Res 2008, 333:449-459.
11. Pittenger M.F., Mackay A.M., Beck S.C., Jaiswal R.K., Douglas R., Mosca J.D., et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999, 284:143-147.
12. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
13. Kilian K.A., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4872-4877.
14. Thomas T.E., Abraham S.J., Lansdorp P.M. Flow cytometry and immunoselection of human stem cells. Methods Mol Med 2002, 63:29-57.
15. Gilbert P.M., Havenstrite K.L., Magnusson K.E., Sacco A., Leonardi N.A., Kraft P., et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 2010, 329:1078-1081.
16. Tsimbouri P.M., McMurray R.J., Burgess K.V., Alakpa E.V., Reynolds P.M., Murawski K., et al. Using nanotopography and metabolomics to identify biochemical effectors of multipotency. ACS Nano 2012, 6:10239-10249.
17. Wang N., Suo Z. Long-distance propagation of forces in a cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 328:1133-1138.
18. Wang N., Butler J.P., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993, 260:1124-1127.
19. Ingber D.E. Integrins, tensegrity, and mechanotransduction. Gravit Space Biol Bull 1997, 10:49-55.
20. Lin F., Worman H.J. Structural organization of the human gene encoding nuclear lamin A and nuclear lamin C. J Biol Chem 1993, 268:16321-16326.
21. Lin F., Worman H. Structural organization of the human gene (LMNB1) encoding nuclear lamin B1. Genomics 1995, 27:230-236.
22. Biamonti G., Giacca M., Perini G., Contreas G., Zentilin L., Weighardt F., et al. The gene for a novel human lamin maps at a highly transcribed locus of chromosome 19 which replicates at the onset of S-phase. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:3499-3506.
23. Moir R.D., Montag-Lowy M., Goldman R.D. Dynamic properties of nuclear lamins: lamin B is associated with sites of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 1994, 125:1201-1212.
24. Moir R.D., Spann T.P., Herrmann H., Goldman R.D. Disruption of nuclear lamin organization blocks the elongation phase of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2000, 149:1179-1192.
25. Gadegaard N., Mosler M., Larsen M.B. Biomimetic polymer nanostructures by injection molding. Macromol Mater Eng 2003, 288:76-83.
26. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25:402-408.
27. Huang J., Grater S.V., Corbellini F., Rinck S., Bock E., Kemkemer R., et al. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009, 9:1111-1116.
28. Franceschi R.T., Xiao G., Jiang D., Gopalakrishnan R., Yang S., Reith E. Multiple signaling pathways converge on the Cbfa1/Runx2 transcription factor to regulate osteoblast differentiation. Connect Tissue Res 2003, 44(Suppl. 1):109-116.
29. Ingber D.E. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 1993, 104(Pt 3):613-627.
30. Ingber D.E. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci 2003, 116:1397-1408.
31. McNamara L.E., Burchmore R., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., Biggs M.J., Wilkinson C.D., et al. The role of microtopography in cellular mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 2012, 33:2835-2847.
32. Mehta I., Amira M., Harvey A., Bridger J. Rapid chromosome territory relocation by nuclear motor activity in response to serum removal in primary human fibroblasts. Genome Biol 2010, 11:1465-6905.
33. Reddy K.L., Zullo J.M., Bertolino E., Singh H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008, 452:243-247.
34. Chen D., Zhao M., Mundy G.R. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factor 2004, 22:233-241.