RhoA-Mediated Functions in C3H10T1/2 Osteoprogenitors Are Substrate Topography Dependent

Journal of Cellular Physiology

Volumn 231, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 568-575

  Ogino, Yoichiro ^a,b   Liang, Ruiwei ^a   Mendonça, Daniela B S ^c   Mendonça, Gustavo ^c   Nagasawa, Masako ^a,d   Koyano, Kiyoshi ^b   Cooper, Lyndon F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLASE INHIBITOR; RHOA GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; TITANIUM; VINCULIN; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; RHOA PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ADHERENT CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICROTOPOGRAPHY; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOPROGENITOR CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; CYTOLOGY; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICE; OSTEOGENESIS; RHO GTP-BINDING PROTEINS;

EID: 84949023745     PISSN: 00219541     EISSN: 10974652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25100     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Whitson SW, Yliheikkila P, Felton DA. 1999. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:37-47.
2. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmen A, Ellingsen JE. 2006. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 27:926-936.
3. de Curtis I, Meldolesi J. 2012. Cell surface dynamics-How Rho GTPases orchestrate the interplay between the plasma membrane and the cortical cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 125:4435-4444.
4. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. 2002. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420:629-635.
5. Galli C, Piemontese M, Lumetti S, Ravanetti F, Macaluso GM, Passeri G. 2012. Actin cytoskeleton controls activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal cells on implant surfaces with different topographies. Acta Biomater 8:2963-2968.
6. Hamamura K, Swarnkar G, Tanjung N, Cho E, Li J, Na S, Yokota H. 2012. RhoA-mediated signaling in mechanotransduction of osteoblasts. Connect Tissue Res 53:398-406.
7. Huveneers S, Danen EH. 2009. Adhesion signaling-Crosstalk between integrins, Src and Rho. J Cell Sci 122:1059-1069.
8. Khatiwala CB, Kim PD, Peyton SR, Putnam AJ. 2009. ECM compliance regulates osteogenesis by influencing MAPK signaling downstream of RhoA and ROCK. J Bone Miner Res 24:886-898.
9. Kulangara K, Yang Y, Yang J, Leong KW. 2012. Nanotopography as modulator of human mesenchymal stem cell function. Biomaterials 33:4998-5003.
10. Lessey EC, Guilluy C, Burridge K. 2012. From mechanical force to RhoA activation. Biochemistry 51:7420-7432.
11. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. 2004. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6:483-495.
12. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF. 2008. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 29:3822-3835.
13. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Simoes LG, Araujo AL, Leite ER, Duarte WR, Cooper LF, Aragão FJ. 2009. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:205-215.
14. 2 treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs. J Biomed Mater Res A 94:169-179.
15. Mullin BH, Mamotte C, Prince RL, Wilson SG. 2014. Influence of ARHGEF3 and RHOA knockdown on ACTA2 and other genes in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. PLoS ONE 9:e98116.
16. Nanci A, Wuest JD, Peru L, Brunet P, Sharma V, Zalzal S, McKee MD. 1998. Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules. J Biomed Mater Res 40:324-335.
17. Passeri G, Cacchioli A, Ravanetti F, Galli C, Elezi E, Macaluso GM. 2010. Adhesion pattern and growth of primary human osteoblastic cells on five commercially available titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:756-765.
18. Prowse PD, Elliott CG, Hutter J, Hamilton DW. 2013. Inhibition of Rac and ROCK signalling influence osteoblast adhesion, differentiation and mineralization on titanium topographies. PLoS ONE 8:e58898.
19. Salou L, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. 2015. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: An experimental study in rabbits. Acta Biomater 11:494-502.
20. Seo CH, Furukawa K, Montagne K, Jeong H, Ushida T. 2011. The effect of substrate microtopography on focal adhesion maturation and actin organization via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomaterials 32:9568-9575.
21. Seo CH, Jeong H, Feng Y, Montagne K, Ushida T, Suzuki Y, Furukawa KS. 2014. Micropit surfaces designed for accelerating osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells via enhancing focal adhesion and actin polymerization. Biomaterials 35:2245-2252.