The role of well-defined nanotopography of titanium implants on osseointegration: Cellular and molecular events in vivo

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 1367-1382

  Karazisis, Dimitrios ^a,b   Ballo, Ahmed M ^a,b,c   Petronis, Sarunas ^b,d   Agheli, Hossein ^a,b   Emanuelsson, Lena ^a,b   Thomsen, Peter ^a,b   Omar, Omar ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b BIOMATCELL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d SP TECHNICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone formation; Energy dispersive X ray spectroscopy; Gene expression; Immunohistochemistry; Inflammatory cytokines; Nanofabrication

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CALCIUM; CARBON; OXYGEN; PHOSPHATE; PROTEIN CATK; TITANIUM; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BIOCOMPATIBLE COATED MATERIAL; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HISTOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROPHAGE; MALE; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RAT; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TIBIA; TITANIUM IMPLANT; TOPOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY; GENETICS; IMPLANT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECTROMETRY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOMARKERS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; IMMUNOENZYME TECHNIQUES; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84962737306     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S101294     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50(3): 399-410.
2. Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7(Suppl 5): S515-S527.
3. Davies JE, Mendes VC, Ko JC, Ajami E. Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface. Biomaterials. 2014; 35(1): 25-35.
4. Ellingsen JE, Thomsen P, Lyngstadaas SP. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006; 41: 136-156.
5. Omar OM, Lenneras ME, Suska F, et al. The correlation between gene expression of proinflammatory markers and bone formation during osseointegration with titanium implants. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(2): 374-386.
6. Branemark R, Emanuelsson L, Palmquist A, Thomsen P. Bone response to laser-induced micro-and nano-size titanium surface features. Nanomedicine. 2011; 7(2): 220-227.
7. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 92(3): 1218-1224.
8. Hanarp P, Sutherland D, Gold J, Kasemo B. Nanostructured model biomaterial surfaces prepared by colloidal lithography. Nanostruct Mater. 1999; 12: 429-432.
9. Hanarp P, Sutherland D, Gold J, Kasemo B. Control of nanoparticle film structure for colloidal lithography. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2003; 214(1-3): 23-36.
10. de Peppo GM, Agheli H, Karlsson C, et al. Osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells to well-defined nanoscale topography in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014; 9: 2499-2515.
11. Ballo A, Agheli H, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P, Petronis S. Nanostructured model implants for in vivo studies: influence of well-defined nanotopography on de novo bone formation on titanium implants. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011; 6: 3415-3428.
12. Omar O, Lenneras M, Svensson S, et al. Integrin and chemokine receptor gene expression in implant-adherent cells during early osseointegration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010; 21(3): 969-980.
13. Omar O, Suska F, Lenneras M, et al. The influence of bone type on the gene expression in normal bone and at the bone-implant interface: experiments in animal model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13(2): 146-156.
14. Omar O, Svensson S, Zoric N, et al. In vivo gene expression in response to anodically oxidized versus machined titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 92(4): 1552-1566.
15. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000; 132: 365-386.
16. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(7): RESEARCH0034.
17. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(15): 5245-5250.
18. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(9): e45.
19. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(3): 403-413.
20. de Oliveira PT, Zalzal SF, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, Nanci A. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 80(3): 554-564.
21. Ercan B, Webster TJ. Greater osteoblast proliferation on anodized nanotubular titanium upon electrical stimulation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008; 3(4): 477-485.
22. Gao H, Li B, Zhao L, Jin Y. Influence of nanotopography on periodontal ligament stem cell functions and cell sheet based periodontal regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10: 4009-4027.
23. Kulkarni M, Mazare A, Gongadze E, et al. Titanium nanostructures for biomedical applications. Nanotechnology. 2015; 26(6): 062002.
24. Shen X, Ma P, Hu Y, Xu G, Zhou J, Cai K. Mesenchymal stem cell growth behavior on micro/nano hierarchical surfaces of titanium substrates. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015; 127: 221-232.
25. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco de Oliveira P, et al. Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Lett. 2009; 9(2): 659-665.
26. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 85(1): 157-166.
27. Lenneras M, Palmquist A, Norlindh B, Emanuelsson L, Thomsen P, Omar O. Oxidized titanium implants enhance osseointegration via mechanisms involving RANK/RANKL/OPG regulation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17(Suppl 2): e486-e500.
28. Omar OM, Graneli C, Ekstrom K, et al. The stimulation of an osteogenic response by classical monocyte activation. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(32): 8190-8204.
29. Thomsen P, Gretzer C. Macrophage interactions with modified material surfaces. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2001; 5(2): 163-176.
30. Ainslie KM, Tao SL, Popat KC, et al. In vitro inflammatory response of nanostructured titania, silicon oxide, and polycaprolactone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009; 91(3): 647-655.
31. Chamberlain L, Brammer K, Johnston G, Chien S, Jin S. Macrophage inflammatory response to TiO2 nanotube surfaces. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2011; 2(3): 293-300.
32. Lu WL, Wang N, Gao P, Li CY, Zhao HS, Zhang ZT. Effects of anodic titanium dioxide nanotubes of different diameters on macrophage secretion and expression of cytokines and chemokines. Cell Prolif. 2015; 48(1): 95-104.
33. Neacsu P, Mazare A, Cimpean A, et al. Reduced inflammatory activity of RAW 264. 7 macrophages on titania nanotube modified Ti surface. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014; 55: 187-195.
34. Lamers E, Walboomers XF, Domanski M, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the inflammatory response to nanoscale grooved substrates. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8(3): 308-317.
35. Ma QL, Zhao LZ, Liu RR, et al. Improved implant osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium surface via mediation of macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2014; 35(37): 9853-9867.
36. Luo YH, Chang LW, Lin P. Metal-based nanoparticles and the immune system: activation, inflammation, and potential applications. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 143720.
37. Zolnik BS, Gonzalez-Fernandez A, Sadrieh N, Dobrovolskaia MA. Nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology. 2010; 151(2): 458-465.
38. Hulander M, Lundgren A, Berglin M, Ohrlander M, Lausmaa J, Elwing H. Immune complement activation is attenuated by surface nanotopography. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011; 6: 2653-2666.
39. Smith BS, Popat KC. Titania nanotube arrays as interfaces for blood-contacting implantable devices: a study evaluating the nanotopography-associated activation and expression of blood plasma components. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2012; 8(4): 642-658.
40. Wang N, Li H, Lu W, et al. Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials. 2011; 32(29): 6900-6911.
41. Cardemil C, Elgali I, Xia W, et al. Strontium-doped calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite granules promote different inflammatory and bone remodelling responses in normal and ovariectomised rats. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e84932.
42. Elgali I, Turri A, Xia W, et al. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable membrane and different bone substitutes: early histological and molecular events. Acta Biomater. 2016; 29: 409-423.
43. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(11): 1327-1333.
44. Variola F, Vetrone F, Richert L, et al. Improving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces: an overview of strategies, fabrication methods, and challenges. Small. 2009; 5(9): 996-1006.
45. Lavenus S, Trichet V, Le Chevalier S, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2012; 7(7): 967-980.
46. Popat KC, Chatvanichkul KI, Barnes GL, Latempa TJ Jr, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 80(4): 955-964.
47. Abagnale G, Steger M, Nguyen VH, et al. Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. Biomaterials. 2015; 61: 316-326.
48. Palmquist A, Emanuelsson L, Branemark R, Thomsen P. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro-and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011; 97(2): 289-298.
49. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Aragao FJ, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron-to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(28): 3822-3835.
50. Orsini G, Piattelli M, Scarano A, et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol. 2007; 78(2): 209-218.
51. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 87(2): 299-307.