The role of RhoA kinase (ROCK) in cell alignment on nanofibers Mohammad Nahid Andalib1

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 7737-7745

  Lee, Jeong Soon ^a   Ha, Ligyeom ^a   Dzenis, Yuris ^a   Lim, Jung Yul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cell alignment; Mesenchymal stem cells; Nanofibers; RhoA kinase; Small hairpin RNA

Indexed keywords

CELL ENGINEERING; CELL SIGNALING; ENZYMES; FLOWCHARTING; LACTIC ACID; NANOFIBERS; RNA; ROCKS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; VECTOR CONTROL (ELECTRIC MACHINERY);

ALIGNED NANOFIBERS; CELL ALIGNMENT; FLATTER SURFACES; HAIRPIN RNA; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MOLECULAR MECHANISM; POLY-L-LACTIC ACIDS; RHOA KINASE; SMALL HAIRPIN RNA; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD;

CELL CULTURE;

4 (1 AMINOETHYL) N (4 PYRIDYL)CYCLOHEXANECARBOXAMIDE; NANOFIBER; POLYLACTIC ACID; RHO KINASE; RHOA KINASE; SHORT HAIRPIN RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LACTIC ACID; POLYMER; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; CELL ALIGNMENT; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOBLOTTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL POLARITY; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; MOUSE; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL POLARITY; LACTIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICE; NANOFIBERS; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYMERS; RHO-ASSOCIATED KINASES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84891715859     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dzenis Y. Material science. Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science 2004;304:1917-9.
2. Dzenis Y. Materials science. Structural nanocomposites. Science 2008;319:419-20.
3. Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011;32:9622-9.
4. Dahlin RL, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Polymeric nanofibers in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2011;17:349-64.
5. Kumar PR, Khan N, Vivekanandhan S, Satyanarayana N, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Nanofibers: effective generation by electrospinning and their applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012;12:1-25.
6. Xie J, MacEwan MR, Schwartz AG, Xia Y. Electrospun nanofibers for neural tissue engineering. Nanoscale 2010;2:35-44.
7. Lim SH, Mao HQ. Electrospun scaffolds for stem cell engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009;61:1084-96.
8. Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J 1996;316:1-11.
9. Ku SH, Lee SH, Park CB. Synergic effects of nanofiber alignment and electroactivity on myoblast differentiation. Biomaterials 2012;33:6098-104.
10. Coburn JM, Gibson M, Monagle S, Patterson Z, Elisseeff JH. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:10012-7.
11. Guex AG, Kocher FM, Fortunato G, Körner E, Hegemann D, Carrel TP, et al. Finetuning of substrate architecture and surface chemistry promotes muscle tissue development. Acta Biomater 2012;8:1481-9.
12. Lim JY, Dreiss AD, Zhou Z, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Hengstebeck RW, et al. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials 2007;28:1787-97.
13. Hansen JC, Lim JY, Xu LC, Siedlecki CA, Mauger DT, Donahue HJ. Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 2007;40:2865-71.
14. Salvi JD, Lim JY, Donahue HJ. Increased mechanosensitivity of cells cultured on nanotopographies. J Biomech 2010;43:3058-62.
15. Lim JY, Loiselle AE, Lee JS, Zhang Y, Salvi JD, Donahue HJ. Optimizing the osteogenic potential of adult stem cells for skeletal regeneration. J Orthop Res 2011;29:1627-33.
16. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 2002;420:629-35.
17. Bhadriraju K, Yang M, Alom Ruiz S, Pirone D, Tan J, Chen CS. Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp Cell Res 2007;313:3616-23.
18. Wilkinson S, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ. Cdc42-MRCK and Rho ROCK signalling cooperate in myosin phosphorylation and cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol 2005;7:255-61.
19. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004;6:483-95.
20. Rao DD, Vorhies JS, Senzer N, Nemunaitis J. SiRNA vs. shRNA: similarities and differences. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009;61:746-59.
21. Riento K, Ridley AJ. Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:446-56.
22. Riddick N, Ohtani K, Surks HK. Targeting by myosin phosphatase-RhoA interacting protein mediates RhoA/ROCK regulation of myosin phosphatase. J Cell Biochem 2008;103:1158-70.
23. Sumi T, Matsumoto K, Shibuya A, Nakamura T. Activation of LIM kinases by myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase alpha. J Biol Chem 2001;276:23092-6.
24. Shi J, Wei L. Rho kinase in the regulation of cell death and survival. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2007;55:61-75.
25. Noma K, Oyama N, Liao JK. Physiological role of ROCKs in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006;290:C661-8.
26. Barman SA, Zhu S, White RE. RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling: a therapeutic target in pulmonary hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2009;5:663-71.
27. Woods A, Beier F. RhoA/ROCK signaling regulates chondrogenesis in a contextdependent manner. J Biol Chem 2006;281:13134-40.
28. Hu J, Liu X, Ma PX. Induction of osteoblast differentiation phenotype on poly(Llactic acid) nanofibrous matrix. Biomaterials 2008;29:3815-21.
29. Tsai SW, Liou HM, Lin CJ, Kuo KL, Hung YS, Weng RC, et al. MG63 osteoblastlike cells exhibit different behavior when grown on electrospun collagen matrix versus electrospun gelatin matrix. PLoS One 2012;7:e31200.
30. Lim JY, Donahue HJ. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue Eng 2007;13:1879-91.
31. Tan H, Biechler S, Junor L, Yost MJ, Dean D, Li J, et al. Fluid flow forces and rhoA regulate fibrous development of the atrioventricular valves. Dev Biol 2013;374:345-56.
32. Castellone RD, Leffler NR, Dong L, Yang LV. Inhibition of tumor cell migration and metastasis by the proton-sensing GPR4 receptor. Cancer Lett 2011;312:197-208.