Filling the Void: Proximity-Based Labeling of Proteins in Living Cells

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 804-817

  Kim, Dae In ^a   Roux, Kyle J ^a,b  

^a SANFORD RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

APEX; BioID; protein protein interactions; proteomics; proximity dependent labeling; subcellular proteome

Indexed keywords

ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE; BIOTIN; CELL PROTEIN; HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE; LIGASE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

BIOTINYLATION; ENZYME ENGINEERING; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CELL SURVIVAL; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; STAINING;

ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84994444646     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. 1 Chakravartty, V., Cronan, J.E., Altered regulation of Escherichia coli biotin biosynthesis in BirA superrepressor mutant strains. J. Bacteriol. 194 (2012), 1113–1126.
2. 2 Choi-Rhee, E., et al. Promiscuous protein biotinylation by Escherichia coli biotin protein ligase. Protein Sci. 13 (2004), 3043–3050.
3. 3 Fernandez-Suarez, M., et al. Protein–protein interaction detection in vitro and in cells by proximity biotinylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008), 9251–9253.
4. 4 Kulyyassov, A., et al. PUB-MS: a mass spectrometry-based method to monitor protein–protein proximity in vivo. J. Proteome Res. 10 (2011), 4416–4427.
5. 5 Liu, D.S., et al. Imaging trans-cellular neurexin–neuroligin interactions by enzymatic probe ligation. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e52823.
6. 6 Jan, C.H., et al. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science, 346, 2014, 1257521.
7. 7 Shoaib, M., et al. PUB-NChIP – “in vivo biotinylation” approach to study chromatin in proximity to a protein of interest. Genome Res. 23 (2013), 331–340.
8. 8 Kodama, Y., Hu, C.D., An improved bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay with a high signal-to-noise ratio. Biotechniques 49 (2010), 793–805.
9. 9 Cabantous, S., et al. A new protein–protein interaction sensor based on tripartite split-GFP association. Sci. Rep., 3, 2013, 2854.
10. 10 Roux, K.J., et al. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 196 (2012), 801–810.
11. 11 Roux, K.J., et al. BioID: a screen for protein–protein interactions. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci., 74, 2013 Unit 19.23.
12. 12 Kim, D.I., et al. Probing nuclear pore complex architecture with proximity-dependent biotinylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), E2453–E2461.
13. 13 Fredriksson, K., et al. Proteomic analysis of proteins surrounding occludin and claudin-4 reveals their proximity to signaling and trafficking networks. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0117074.
14. 14 Guo, Z., et al. E-cadherin interactome complexity and robustness resolved by quantitative proteomics. Sci. Signal., 7, 2014, rs7.
15. 15 Steed, E., et al. MarvelD3 couples tight junctions to the MEKK1–JNK pathway to regulate cell behavior and survival. J. Cell Biol. 204 (2014), 821–838.
16. 16 Ueda, S., et al. Force dependent biotinylation of myosin IIA by α-catenin tagged with a promiscuous biotin ligase. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0122886.
17. 17 Van Itallie, C.M., et al. The N and C termini of ZO-1 are surrounded by distinct proteins and functional protein networks. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013), 13775–13788.
18. 18 Van Itallie, C.M., et al. Biotin ligase tagging identifies proteins proximal to E-cadherin, including lipoma preferred partner, a regulator of epithelial cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 127 (2014), 885–895.
19. 19 Hu, H., et al. SAS-4 protein in Trypanosoma brucei controls life cycle transitions by modulating the length of the flagellum attachment zone filament. J. Biol. Chem. 290 (2015), 30453–30463.
20. 20 McAllaster, M.R., et al. Proteomic identification of novel cytoskeletal proteins associated with TbPLK, an essential regulator of cell morphogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biol. Cell 26 (2015), 3013–3029.
21. 21 Morriswood, B., et al. Novel bilobe components in Trypanosoma brucei identified using proximity-dependent biotinylation. Eukaryot. Cell 12 (2013), 356–367.
22. 22 Zhou, Q., et al. An EF-hand-containing protein in Trypanosoma brucei regulates cytokinesis initiation by maintaining the stability of the cytokinesis initiation factor CIF1. J. Biol. Chem. 291 (2016), 14395–14409.
23. 23 Kim, D.I., et al. An improved smaller biotin ligase for BioID proximity labeling. Mol. Biol. Cell 27 (2016), 1188–1196.
24. β−TrCP1/2 E3 ligase substrates. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14 (2015), 1781–1795.
25. 25 Dingar, D., et al. BioID identifies novel c-MYC interacting partners in cultured cells and xenograft tumors. J. Proteomics 118 (2015), 95–111.
26. 26 Gupta, G.D., et al. A dynamic protein interaction landscape of the human centrosome-cilium interface. Cell 163 (2015), 1484–1499.
27. 27 Kehrer, J., et al. Proteomic analysis of the Plasmodium berghei gametocyte egressome and vesicular BioID of osmiophilic body proteins identifies MTRAP as an essential factor for parasite transmission. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15 (2016), 2852–2862.
28. 28 Zempleni, J., Uptake, localization, and noncarboxylase roles of biotin. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 25 (2005), 175–196.
29. 29 Honke, K., Kotani, N., The enzyme-mediated activation of radical source reaction: a new approach to identify partners of a given molecule in membrane microdomains. J. Neurochem. 116 (2011), 690–695.
30. 30 Gross, A.J., Sizer, I.W., The oxidation of tyramine, tyrosine, and related compounds by peroxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 234 (1959), 1611–1614.
31. 31 Schonhuber, W., et al. Improved sensitivity of whole-cell hybridization by the combination of horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligonucleotides and tyramide signal amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 (1997), 3268–3273.
32. 32 Kotani, N., et al. Biochemical visualization of cell surface molecular clustering in living cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 7405–7409.
33. 33 Schofer, C., et al. Signal amplification at the ultrastructural level using biotinylated tyramides and immunogold detection. Histochem. Cell Biol. 108 (1997), 313–319.
34. 34 Rhee, H.W., et al. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 339 (2013), 1328–1331.
35. 35 Jiang, S., et al. A proteomics approach to the cell-surface interactome using the enzyme-mediated activation of radical sources reaction. Proteomics 12 (2012), 54–62.
36. 36 Miyagawa-Yamaguchi, A., et al. Expressed glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored horseradish peroxidase identifies co-clustering molecules in individual lipid raft domains. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e93054.
37. 37 Li, X.W., et al. New insights into the DT40 B cell receptor cluster using a proteomic proximity labeling assay. J. Biol. Chem. 289 (2014), 14434–14447.
38. 38 Rees, J.S., et al. Selective proteomic proximity labeling assay using tyramide (SPPLAT): a quantitative method for the proteomic analysis of localized membrane-bound protein clusters. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci., 80, 2015 19.27.119.27.18.
39. 39 Martell, J.D., et al. Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2012), 1143–1148.
40. 40 Hopkins, C., et al. Chimeric molecules employing horseradish peroxidase as reporter enzyme for protein localization in the electron microscope. Methods Enzymol. 327 (2000), 35–45.
41. 41 Lam, S.S., et al. Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 51–54.
42. 42 Mick, D.U., et al. Proteomics of primary cilia by proximity labeling. Dev. Cell 35 (2015), 497–512.
43. 2+ influx. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 1339–1347.
44. 44 Chen, C.L., et al. Proteomic mapping in live Drosophila tissues using an engineered ascorbate peroxidase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 12093–12098.
45. 45 Hung, V., et al. Spatially resolved proteomic mapping in living cells with the engineered peroxidase APEX2. Nat. Protoc. 11 (2016), 456–475.
46. 46 Hung, V., et al. Proteomic mapping of the human mitochondrial intermembrane space in live cells via ratiometric APEX tagging. Mol. Cell 55 (2014), 332–341.
47. 47 Echols, N., et al. Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002), 2515–2523.
48. 48 Tourasse, N.J., Li, W.H., Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 (2000), 656–664.
49. 49 Chojnowski, A., et al. Progerin reduces LAP2α–telomere association in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria. Elife, 2015, 10.7554/eLife.07759 Published online August 27, 2015.
50. 50 Fu, Y., et al. MacroH2A1 associates with nuclear lamina and maintains chromatin architecture in mouse liver cells. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 17186.
51. 51 Comartin, D., et al. CEP120 and SPICE1 cooperate with CPAP in centriole elongation. Curr. Biol. 23 (2013), 1360–1366.
52. 52 Firat-Karalar, E.N., et al. Proximity interactions among centrosome components identify regulators of centriole duplication. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 664–670.
53. 53 Dong, J.M., et al. Proximity biotinylation provides insight into the molecular composition of focal adhesions at the nanometer scale. Sci. Signal., 9, 2016, rs4.
54. 54 Chen, A.L., et al. Novel components of the Toxoplasma inner membrane complex revealed by BioID. MBio 6 (2015), e02357–e2414.
55. 55 Batsios, P., et al. Src1 is a protein of the inner nuclear membrane interacting with the Dictyostelium lamin NE81. Cells., 2016, 10.3390/cells5010013 Published online March 18, 2016.
56. 56 Wei, Y., et al. CHCHD2 is coamplified with EGFR in NSCLC and regulates mitochondrial function and cell migration. Mol. Cancer Res. 13 (2015), 1119–1129.
57. 57 Bhaduri, A., et al. Network analysis identifies mitochondrial regulation of epidermal differentiation by MPZL3 and FDXR. Dev. Cell 35 (2015), 444–457.
58. 58 Cole, A., et al. Inhibition of the mitochondrial protease ClpP as a therapeutic strategy for human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 27 (2015), 864–876.
59. 59 Lamb, C.A., et al. TBC1D14 regulates autophagy via the TRAPP complex and ATG9 traffic. EMBO J. 35 (2016), 281–301.
60. 60 Couzens, A.L., et al. Protein interaction network of the mammalian Hippo pathway reveals mechanisms of kinase–phosphatase interactions. Sci. Signal., 6, 2013, rs15.
61. 61 Zhou, Z., et al. The cerebral cavernous malformation pathway controls cardiac development via regulation of endocardial MEKK3 signaling and KLF expression. Dev. Cell 32 (2015), 168–180.
62. 62 Cheng, Y.S., et al. PPP2R5C couples hepatic glucose and lipid homeostasis. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005561.
63. 63 Sun, B.K., et al. CALML5 is a ZNF750- and TINCR-induced protein that binds stratifin to regulate epidermal differentiation. Genes Dev. 29 (2015), 2225–2230.
64. 64 Elzi, D.J., et al. Proteomic analysis of the EWS-Fli-1 interactome reveals the role of the lysosome in EWS-Fli-1 turnover. J. Proteome Res. 13 (2014), 3783–3791.
65. 65 Lambert, J.P., et al. Proximity biotinylation and affinity purification are complementary approaches for the interactome mapping of chromatin-associated protein complexes. J. Proteomics 118 (2015), 81–94.
66. 66 Mulholland, C.B., et al. A modular open platform for systematic functional studies under physiological conditions. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 2015, e112.
67. 67 Caballe, A., et al. ULK3 regulates cytokinetic abscission by phosphorylating ESCRT-III proteins. Elife, 4, 2015, e06547.
68. 68 Yeh, C., et al. The deubiquitinase USP37 regulates chromosome cohesion and mitotic progression. Curr. Biol. 25 (2015), 2290–2299.
69. 69 Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A.E., et al. Developmental regulation of apical endocytosis controls epithelial patterning in vertebrate tubular organs. Nat. Cell Biol. 17 (2015), 241–250.
70. 70 Vijay, S., et al. Exclusive expression of the Rab11 effector SH3TC2 in Schwann cells links integrin-α and myelin maintenance to Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 4C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862 (2016), 1279–1290.
71. 71 Schweingruber, C., et al. Identification of interactions in the NMD complex using proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID). PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0150239.
72. 72 Nishimura, T., et al. The eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T is a component of the mRNA decay machinery that bridges the 5′ and 3′ termini of target mRNAs. Cell Rep. 11 (2015), 1425–1436.
73. 73 Schumacher, M.M., et al. The prenyltransferase UBIAD1 is the target of geranylgeraniol in degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Elife., 2015, 10.7554/eLife.05560 Published online March 5, 2015.
74. 74 Jahan, A.S., et al. Usp12 stabilizes the T-cell receptor complex at the cell surface during signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), E705–E714.
75. 75 Marcos-Ramiro, B., et al. RhoB controls endothelial barrier recovery by inhibiting Rac1 trafficking to the cell border. J. Cell Biol. 213 (2016), 385–402.
76. 76 Janer, A., et al. SLC25A46 is required for mitochondrial lipid homeostasis and cristae maintenance and is responsible for Leigh syndrome. EMBO Mol. Med. 8 (2016), 1019–1038.
77. 77 Forred, B.J., et al. Identification of redox and glucose-dependent Txnip protein interactions. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2016, 2016, 5829063.
78. 78 Kabeiseman, E.J., et al. The eukaryotic signal sequence, YGRL, targets the chlamydial inclusion. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 4, 2014, 129.
79. 79 Mojica, S.A., et al. SINC, a type III secreted protein of Chlamydia psittaci, targets the inner nuclear membrane of infected cells and uninfected neighbors. Mol. Biol. Cell 26 (2015), 1918–1934.
80. 80 Le Sage, V., et al. Proteomic analysis of HIV-1 Gag interacting partners using proximity-dependent biotinylation. Virol. J., 12, 2015, 138.
81. 81 Ritchie, C., et al. Analysis of HIV-1 Gag protein interactions via biotin ligase tagging. J. Virol. 89 (2015), 3988–4001.
82. 82 Kueck, T., et al. Serine phosphorylation of HIV-1 Vpu and its binding to tetherin regulates interaction with clathrin adaptors. PLoS Pathog., 11, 2015, e1005141.
83. 83 Holthusen, K., et al. Regulation of latent membrane protein 1 signaling through interaction with cytoskeletal proteins. J. Virol. 89 (2015), 7277–7290.
84. 84 Gaji, R.Y., et al. Phosphorylation of a myosin motor by TgCDPK3 facilitates rapid initiation of motility during Toxoplasma gondii egress. PLoS Pathog., 11, 2015, e1005268.
85. 85 Hashimoto, N., et al. Proteomic analysis of ganglioside-associated membrane molecules: substantial basis for molecular clustering. Proteomics 12 (2012), 3154–3163.
86. 86 Ishiura, Y., et al. Anomalous expression of Thy1 (CD90) in B-cell lymphoma cells and proliferation inhibition by anti-Thy1 antibody treatment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 396 (2010), 329–334.
87. 87 Yamashita, R., et al. Spatiotemporally-regulated interaction between β1 integrin and ErbB4 that is involved in fibronectin-dependent cell migration. J. Biochem. 149 (2011), 347–355.
88. 88 Kotani, N., et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) associated with the CD20 antigen regulates the rituximab-induced proliferation inhibition in B-cell lymphoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012), 37109–37118.
89. 89 Iwamaru, Y., et al. Proximity of SCG10 and prion protein in membrane rafts. J. Neurochem., 2015, 10.1111/jnc.13488 Published online December 10, 2015.
90. 90 Lee, S.Y., et al. APEX fingerprinting reveals the subcellular localization of proteins of interest. Cell Rep. 15 (2016), 1837–1847.
91. 91 Hwang, J., Espenshade, P.J., Proximity-dependent biotin labeling in yeast using the engineered ascorbate peroxidase APEX2. Biochem. J. 473 (2016), 2463–2469.