Clinical Components of Telemedicine Programs for Diabetic Retinopathy

Current Diabetes Reports

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Horton, Mark B ^a   Silva, Paolo S ^b,c   Cavallerano, Jerry D ^b,c   Aiello, Lloyd Paul ^b,c  

^a INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE   (United States)

^b JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic retinopathy; Telemedicine; Teleophthalmology

Indexed keywords

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FUNDUS CAMERA; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE GRADER; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MYDRIASIS; RETINAL FIELD; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMARTPHONE; TELEMEDICINE; ULTRAWIDE FIELD IMAGING; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PROCEDURES;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; HUMANS; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84993969495     PISSN: 15344827     EISSN: 15390829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11892-016-0813-8     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
2. Frank RN. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:48–58.
3. Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:179–83.
4. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:556–64.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 National diabetes statistics report. (2016). Retrieved 1 May 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html.
6. Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF, Cotch MF, Cheng YJ, Geiss LS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. JAMA. 2010;304:649–56.
7. Whited JD, Datta SK, Aiello LM, Aiello LP, Cavallerano JD, Conlin PR, et al. A modeled economic analysis of a digital tele-ophthalmology system as used by three federal health care agencies for detecting proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11:641–51.
8. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796–806.
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The state of health care quality report 2015. (2016). Retrieved 1 May 2016, from http://www.ncqa.org/report-cards/health-plans/state-of-health-care-quality.
10. Hartnett ME, Key IJ, Loyacano NM, Horswell RL, Desalvo KB. Perceived barriers to diabetic eye care: qualitative study of patients and physicians. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:387–91.
11. Bressler NM, Varma R, Doan QV, Gleeson M, Danese M, Bower JK, et al. Underuse of the health care system by persons with diabetes mellitus and diabetic macular edema in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013.
12. Leese GP, Boyle P, Feng Z, Emslie-Smith A, Ellis JD. Screening uptake in a well-established diabetic retinopathy screening program: the role of geographical access and deprivation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2131–5.
13. Danielsen R, Jonasson F, Helgason T. Prevalence of retinopathy and proteinuria in type 1 diabetics in Iceland. Acta Med Scand. 1982;212:277–80.
14. Lau HC, Voo YO, Yeo KT, Ling SL, Jap A. Mass screening for diabetic retinopathy—a report on diabetic retinal screening in primary care clinics in Singapore. Singap Med J. 1995;36:510–3.
15. Conlin PR, Fisch BM, Cavallerano AA, Cavallerano JD, Bursell SE, Aiello LM. Nonmydriatic teleretinal imaging improves adherence to annual eye examinations in patients with diabetes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:733–40.
16. Fonda SJ, Bursell SE, Lewis DG, Garren J, Hock K, Cavallerano J. The relationship of a diabetes telehealth eye care program to standard eye care and change in diabetes health outcomes. Telemed J e-Health. 2007;13:635–44.
17. Wilson C, Horton M, Cavallerano J, Aiello LM. Addition of primary care-based retinal imaging technology to an existing eye care professional referral program increased the rate of surveillance and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:318–22.
18. Liew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16–64 years), 1999–2000 with 2009–2010. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004015.
19. American Telemedicine Association, Telemedicine Glossary. (2016) Retrieved 17 October 2016 at http://thesource.americantelemed.org/resources/telemedicine-glossary/.
20. Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159:360–4 e1.
21. •Ryan ME, Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, Anjana RM, Ranjani H, Narayan KM, et al. Comparison Among Methods of Retinopathy Assessment (CAMRA) study: smartphone, nonmydriatic, and mydriatic photography. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2038–43. This is a study showing the potential and limitations of Smartphone retinal imaging through a comparison with nonmydriatic fundus photography.
22. Toy BC, Myung DJ, He L, Pan CK, Chang RT, Polkinhorne A, et al. Smartphone-based dilated fundus photography and near visual acuity testing as inexpensive screening tools to detect referral warranted diabetic eye disease. Retina. 2016;36:1000–8.
23. Peter J, Piantadosi J, Piantadosi C, Cooper P, Gehling N, Kaufmann C, et al. Use of real-time telemedicine in the detection of diabetic macular oedema: a pilot study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:312–6.
24. Bolster NM, Giardini ME, Bastawrous A. The diabetic retinopathy screening workflow: potential for smartphone imaging. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10:318–24.
25. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:549–59.
26. Wilson PJ, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Ellingford A, Talbot J, Leese GP. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224:251–7.
27. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Tolls D, Omar A, Thakore K, Patel B, et al. Potential efficiency benefits of nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging in an ocular telehealth diabetic retinopathy program. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:50–5.
28. Silva PS, Horton MB, Clary D, Lewis DG, Sun JK, Cavallerano JD, et al. Identification of diabetic retinopathy and ungradable image rate with ultrawide field imaging in a national teleophthalmology program. Ophthalmology. 2016. This is an important study demonstrating the benefits of UWFI as compared to traditional fields in an existing large DR-Tmed program.
29. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:572–85.
30. Lawrence MG. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:321–40.
31. Pasquel FJ, Hendrick AM, Ryan M, Cason E, Ali MK, Narayan KM. Cost-effectiveness of different diabetic retinopathy screening modalities. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10:301–7.
32. Micheletti JM, Hendrick AM, Khan FN, Ziemer DC, Pasquel FJ. Current and next generation portable screening devices for diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:295–300.
33. Murthy KR, Murthy PR, Kapur A, Owens DR. Mobile diabetes eye care: experience in developing countries. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97:343–9.
34. Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ, Eikelboom RH, McAllister IL, Tay-Kearney ML. Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera. Telemed J. 2000;6:219–23.
35. Stillman JK, Gole GA, Wootton R, Woolfield N, Price D, Van der Westhuyzen J, et al. Telepaediatrics and diabetic retinopathy screening of young people with diabetes in Queensland. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10 Suppl 1:92–4.
36. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Haddad NM, Kwak H, Dyer KH, Omar AF, et al. Peripheral lesions identified on ultrawide field imaging predict increased risk of diabetic retinopathy progression over 4 years. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:949–56.
37. Sun JK, Aiello LP. The future of ultrawide field imaging for diabetic retinopathy: pondering the retinal periphery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:247–8.
38. Saine PJ, Tyler ME. Ophthalmic photography: retinal photography, angiography, and electronic imaging. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Medical; 2013. Fundus Photography Overview. Retrieved 1 May 2016 at http://www.opsweb.org/?page=fundusphotography.
39. Diabetic retinopathy study. Report number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;21:1–226.
40. Deb-Joardar N, Germain N, Thuret G, Manoli P, Garcin AF, Millot L, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:814–21.
41. •Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6753–61. A rigorous comparison of monoscopic versus stereoscopic techniques for evaluation of DME.
42. Shiba T, Yamamoto T, Seki U, Utsugi N, Fujita K, Sato Y, et al. Screening and follow-up of diabetic retinopathy using a new mosaic 9-field fundus photography system. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002;55:49–59.
43. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Soliman AZ, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2587–95.
44. Yip JL, Foster PJ. Ethnic differences in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:175–80.
45. Liew G, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Fundoscopy: to dilate or not to dilate? BMJ. 2006;332:3.
46. Pandit RJ, Taylor R. Mydriasis and glaucoma: exploding the myth. A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2000;17:693–9.
47. Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:1132–7.
48. Hreidarsson AB. Pupil size in insulin-dependent diabetes. Relationship to duration, metabolic control, and long-term manifestations. Diabetes. 1982;31:442–8.
49. Klein BE, Klein R, Wang Q, Moss SE. Older-onset diabetes and lens opacities. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1995;2:49–55.
50. Scanlon PH, Foy C, Malhotra R, Aldington SJ. The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2448–53.
51. Raman R, Rani PK, Mahajan S, Paul P, Gnanamoorthy P, Krishna MS, et al. The tele-screening model for diabetic retinopathy: evaluating the influence of mydriasis on the gradability of a single-field 45 degrees digital fundus image. Telemed J e-Health. 2007;13:597–602.
52. Murgatroyd H, Cox A, Ellingford A, Ellis JD, Macewen CJ, Leese GP. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy? Eye (London). 2008;22:344–8.
53. Maberley D, Cruess AF, Barile G, Slakter J. Digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in the James Bay Cree. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9:169–78.
54. Li HK, Horton M, Bursell SE, Cavallerano J, Zimmer-Galler I, Tennant M, et al. Telehealth practice recommendations for diabetic retinopathy, second edition. Telemed J e-Health. 2011;17:814–37.
55. British Diabetic Association. Retinal photographic screening for diabetic eye disease. A British Diabetic Association report. London: British Diabetic Association; 1997.
56. Zimmer-Galler IE, Zeimer R. Telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy screening. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2009;49:75–86.
57. Ophthalmic Photographers’ Society: clinical trial resources. Retrieved 1 May 2016 from http://www.opsweb.org/?page=ClinicalTrials.
58. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):204–13.
59. Bhargava M, Cheung CY, Sabanayagam C, Kawasaki R, Harper CA, Lamoureux EL, et al. Accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by trained non-physician graders using non-mydriatic fundus camera. Singap Med J. 2012;53:715–9.
60. Suansilpong A, Rawdaree P. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2008;91:1397–403.
61. Andonegui J, Zurutuza A, de Arcelus MP, Serrano L, Eguzkiza A, Auzmendi M, et al. Diabetic retinopathy screening with non-mydriatic retinography by general practitioners: 2-year results. Prim Care Diabetes. 2012;6:201–5.
62. Askew D, Schluter PJ, Spurling G, Maher CM, Cranstoun P, Kennedy C, et al. Diabetic retinopathy screening in general practice: a pilot study. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38:650–6.
63. Lim MC, Lee SY, Cheng BC, Wong DW, Ong SG, Ang CL, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in diabetics referred to a tertiary centre from a nationwide screening programme. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008;37:753–9.
64. Romero P, Sagarra R, Ferrer J, Fernandez-Ballart J, Baget M. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;88:184–8.
65. Glasson NM, Crossland LJ, Larkins SL. An innovative Australian outreach model of diabetic retinopathy screening in remote communities. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1267215.
66. Romero-Aroca P, Sagarra-Alamo R, Basora-Gallisa J, Basora-Gallisa T, Baget-Bernaldiz M, Bautista-Perez A. Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:1481–8.
67. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Tolson AM, Rodriguez J, Rodriguez S, Ajlan R, et al. Real-time ultrawide field image evaluation of retinopathy in a diabetes telemedicine program. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:1643–9.
68. Amazon Medical Turk. Retrieved 1 May 1016 at https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome.
69. Brady CJ, Villanti AC, Pearson JL, Kirchner TR, Gupta OP, Shah CP. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e233.
70. Hudson SM, Contreras R, Kanter MH, Munz SJ, Fong DS. Centralized reading center improves quality in a real-world setting. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46:624–9.
71. Conlin PR, Fisch BM, Orcutt JC, Hetrick BJ, Darkins AW. Framework for a national teleretinal imaging program to screen for diabetic retinopathy in Veterans Health Administration patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:741–8.
72. Eusebi P. Diagnostic accuracy measures. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36:267–72.
73. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786–806.
74. Scanlon PH. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen. 2008;15:1–4.
75. Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, Pilotto E, Varano M, Cavarzeran F, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:111–8.
76. Wilkinson CP, Ferris III FL, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1677–82.
77. Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, Klein BE. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:823–8.
78. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, van Heuven WA, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:889–95.
79. Baeza M, Orozco-Beltran D, Gil-Guillen VF, Pedrera V, Ribera MC, Pertusa S, et al. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate? Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:433–8.
80. Saari JM, Summanen P, Kivela T, Saari KM. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:126–30.
81. Schiffman RM, Jacobsen G, Nussbaum JJ, Desai UR, Carey JD, Glasser D, et al. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2005;36:46–56.
82. •Malerbi FK, Morales PH, Farah ME, Drummond KR, Mattos TC, Pinheiro AA, et al. Comparison between binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and digital retinography for diabetic retinopathy screening: the multicenter Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015;7:116. This study shows the clinical efficacy of DR-Tmed, including a head to head comparison of mydriatic versus non-mydriatic imaging.
83. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, et al. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:920–4.
84. Ahmed J, Ward TP, Bursell SE, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Vigersky RA. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2205–9.
85. Maker MP, Noble J, Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Murtha TJ, Sun JK, et al. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:515–22.
86. Gupta V, Bansal R, Gupta A, Bhansali A. Sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital imaging in screening diabetic retinopathy in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:851–6.
87. Kim HM, Lowery JC, Kurtz R. Accuracy of digital images for assessing diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1:531–9.
88. Hansen AB, Sander B, Larsen M, Kleener J, Borch-Johnsen K, Klein R, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:656–65.
89. Choremis J, Chow DR. Use of telemedicine in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2003;38:575–9.
90. Boucher MC, Desroches G, Garcia-Salinas R, Kherani A, Maberley D, Olivier S, et al. Teleophthalmology screening for diabetic retinopathy through mobile imaging units within Canada. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43:658–68.
91. Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JC, Cole DR. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:19–24.
92. Ruamviboonsuk P, Wongcumchang N, Surawongsin P, Panyawatananukul E, Tiensuwan M. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2005;88:176–80.
93. Newsom R, Moate B, Casswell T. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography. Eye (London). 2000;14(Pt 4):579–82.
94. Chasan JE, Delaune B, Maa AY, Lynch MG. Effect of a teleretinal screening program on eye care use and resources. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:1045–51.
95. Hejlesen O, Ege B, Englmeier KH, Aldington S, McCanna L, Bek T. TOSCA-imaging—developing Internet based image processing software for screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107:222–6.
96. Farley TF, Mandava N, Prall FR, Carsky C. Accuracy of primary care clinicians in screening for diabetic retinopathy using single-image retinal photography. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:428–34.
97. Marcus DM, Brooks SE, Ulrich LD, Bassi FH, Laird M, Johnson M, et al. Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1907–14.
98. Tennant MT, Greve MD, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36:187–96.
99. Peng J, Zou H, Wang W, Fu J, Shen B, Bai X, et al. Implementation and first-year screening results of an ocular telehealth system for diabetic retinopathy in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:250.
100. Ng M, Nathoo N, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT. Improving access to eye care: teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:289–96.
101. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1748–54.
102. Chun DW, Bauer RM, Ward TP, Dick 2nd JS, Bower KS. Evaluation of digital fundus images as a diagnostic method for surveillance of diabetic retinopathy. Mil Med. 2007;172:405–10.