Current and Next Generation Portable Screening Devices for Diabetic Retinopathy

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 295-300

  Micheletti, J Morgan ^a   Hendrick, Andrew M ^a   Khan, Farah N ^a   Ziemer, David C ^a   Pasquel, Francisco J ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

diabetic retinopathy; retina; screening; smartphone; telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SMARTPHONE; SOFTWARE; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; TELEMEDICINE; TRENDS; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85009259861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296816629158     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kobrin Klein BE,. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2007; 14 (4): 179-183.
2. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ., Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87 (1): 4-14.
3. Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE., The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XXII the twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115 (11): 1859-1868.
4. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 556-564.
5. Haw JS, Tantry S, Vellanki P, Pasquel FJ., National strategies to decrease the burden of diabetes and its complications. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2015; 15 (9): 637.
6. Association AD. 9. Microvascular complications and foot care. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38 (suppl 1): S58-S66.
7. Bressler NM, Varma R, Doan QV, et al. Underuse of the health care system by persons with diabetes mellitus and diabetic macular edema in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014; 132 (2): 168-173.
8. Kirkizlar E, Serban N, Sisson JA, Swann JL, Barnes CS, Williams MD., Evaluation of telemedicine for screening of diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120 (12): 2604-2610.
9. Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F., Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 159 (2): 360-364.
10. Ryan ME, Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, et al. Comparison Among Methods of Retinopathy Assessment (CAMRA) study: smartphone, nonmydriatic, and mydriatic photography. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 2038-2043.
11. Sarwar M, Soomro TR., Impact of smartphones on society. Eur J Sci Res. 2013; 98: 216-226.
12. Lord RK, Shah VA, San Filippo AN, Krishna R., Novel uses of smartphones in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117 (6): 1274-1274.
13. Bastawrous A., Smartphone fundoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119 (2): 432-433.
14. Haddock LJ, Kim DY, Mukai S., Simple, inexpensive technique for high-quality smartphone fundus photography in human and animal eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2013; 2013: 518479.
15. Myung D, Jais A, He L, Blumenkranz MS, Chang RT., 3D printed smartphone indirect lens adapter for rapid, high quality retinal imaging. J Mobile Tech Med. 2014; 3 (1): 9-15.
16. Portable Eye Examination Kit (PEEK). Available at: http://www.peekvision.org. Accessed August 12, 2015.
17. Giardini ME, Livingstone IA, Jordan S, et al. A smartphone based ophthalmoscope. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014; 2014: 2177-2180.
18. Maamari RN, Keenan JD, Fletcher DA, Margolis TP., A mobile phone-based retinal camera for portable wide field imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98 (4): 438-441.
19. Bhat S, Bhaskaranand M, Ramachandra C, Margolis TP, Fletcher DA, Solanki K., Fully-automated diabetic retinopathy screening using cellphone-based cameras. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56 (7): 1428-1428.
20. Fink W, Tarbell M., Smart ophthalmics: a smart service platform for tele-ophthalmology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56 (7): 4110-4110.
21. Pérez GM, Swart W, Munyenyembe JK, Saranchuk P., Barriers to pilot mobile teleophthalmology in a rural hospital in Southern Malawi. Pan African Med J. 2014; 19: 136.
22. Pictor Plus-digital ophtalmic imager. Available at: http://volk.com/pictorplus/. Accessed August 12, 2015.
23. Zhang W, Nicholas P, Schuman S, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using the hand-held PICTOR camera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56 (7): 1426-1426.
24. eyeMITRA: Mobile Retinal Imaging and Predictive Analytics. Available at: http://eyemitra.com. Accessed August 12, 2015.
25. Swedish T, Roesch K, Lee IH, Rastogi K, Bernstein S, Raskar R., EyeSelfie: self directed eye alignment using reciprocal eye box imaging. ACM Trans Graphics. 2015; 34 (4): 58.
26. Shirao Y, Kawasaki K., Electrical responses from diabetic retina. Progress Retinal Eye Res. 1998; 17 (1): 59-76.
27. Kim DB, Ross E, Pham K, et al. New handheld, non-mydriatic ERG device to screen for diabetic retinopathy and other eye diseases. Hemoglobin. 2014; 1 (7.3): 1. 3.
28. Maa A, Pillow E, Feuer W, et al. Comparing technical failure rates in diabetic retinopathy screening between RETeval, a 30 Hz flicker electroretinogram device, and mydriatic, 7-field, stereo fundus photography. Diabetes. 2014 (suppl 1). Available at: http://app.core-apps.com/tristar-ada14/abstract/e3048dedfd3d5fbcc516bc86383b513f.
29. Alasil T, Keane PA, Updike JF, et al. Relationship between optical coherence tomography retinal parameters and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117 (12): 2379-2386.
30. Lu CD, Kraus MF, Potsaid B, et al. Handheld ultrahigh speed swept source optical coherence tomography instrument using a MEMS scanning mirror. Biomed Optics Express. 2014; 5 (1): 293-311.
31. Klein R, Klein BE., Vision disorders in diabetes. Diabetes in America. 1995; 1: 293.
32. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW., Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4-7 yr before clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care. 1992; 15 (7): 815-819.
33. Porta M, Curletto G, Cipullo D, et al. Estimating the delay between onset and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes from the time course of retinopathy prevalence. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37 (6): 1668-1674.
34. Li Z, Wu C, Olayiwola JN, Hilaire D, Huang JJ., Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Connecticut Med. 2012; 76 (2): 85-90.
35. Pasquel FJ, Hendrick AM, Ryan M, Cason E, Ali MK, Venkat Narayan KM,. Cost-effectiveness of different diabetic retinopathy screening modalities. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016; 10 (2): 301-307.
36. Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Perez MA, Biousse V., Non-mydriatic ocular fundus photography and telemedicine: past, present, and future. Neuroophthalmology. 2013; 37 (2).
37. Bruce BB, Lamirel C, Biousse V, et al. Feasibility of nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography in the emergency department: Phase I of the FOTO-ED study. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18 (9): 928-933.
38. Fonda SJ, Bursell SE, Lewis DG, Garren J, Hock K, Cavallerano J., The relationship of a diabetes telehealth eye care program to standard eye care and change in diabetes health outcomes. Telemedicine J E-health. 2007; 13 (6): 635-644.
39. MacCuish A., Early detection and screening for diabetic retinopathy. Eye. 1993; 7 (2): 254-259.
40. Kumar S, Wang EH, Pokabla MJ, Noecker RJ., Teleophthalmology assessment of diabetic retinopathy fundus images: smartphone versus standard office computer workstation. Telemedicine J E-health. 2012; 18 (2): 158-162.