The tele-screening model for diabetic retinopathy: Evaluating the influence of mydriasis on the gradability of a single-field 45° digital fundus image

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 597-602

  Raman, Rajiv ^a   Rani, Padmaja Kumari ^a   Mahajan, Sheshadri ^a   Paul, Pradeep ^a   Gnanamoorthy, P ^a   Krishna, M S ^a   Sharma, Tarun ^a  

^a SANKARA NETHRALAYA   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATIENT TREATMENT; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; TELESCREENING;

MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CAMERA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INDIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MYDRIASIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SCREENING TEST; TELEMEDICINE; VISUAL ACUITY; AGE; AGED; EVALUATION; HEALTH SURVEY; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; FUNDUS OCULI; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MYDRIASIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 38349163294     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0084     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. National Society to prevent Blindness. Vision Problems in the U.S.A. New York: National Society to Prevent Blindness, Operational Research Department, 1980.
2. Kumar R. Ophthalmic manpower in India - Need for a serious review. Int Ophthalmol 1993;17:269-275.
3. Samandar R, Kleefield S, Hammel J, Mehta M, Crone R. Privately funded quality health care in India: A sustainable and equitable model. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:283-288.
4. Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: The Liverpool diabetic eye study. BMJ 1995;311:1131-1135.
5. Taylor R. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: Report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association mobile retinal screening group. Diabet Med 1996;13:946-952.
6. Thompson CJ, Leese GP. The evaluation of mobile screening for diabetic retinopathy. Scott Med J 1995;40:5-7.
7. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WM, Alberti KG, Brackenridge RG, Stephenson P, Young E. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1990;301:1243-1247.
8. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Leese GP. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:920- 924.
9. Lairson DR, Pugh JA, Kapadia AS, Lorimor RJ, Jacobsen J, Velez R. Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1369-1377.
10. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WA, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, Lorimor RJ, Kapadia AS, Velez R. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: The wide angle camera. Diabetes Care 1993;16:889-895.
11. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ Leese GP. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:920- 924.
12. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Thomas G, Foy C, Kirkpatrick JN, Lewis-Barned N, Harney B, Aldington SJ. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy. Diabet Med. 2003;20:467-474.
13. Deb-Joardar N, Germain N, Thuret G, Manoli P, Garcin AF, Millot L, Gavet Y, Estour B, Gain P. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:814-821.
14. Scanlon PH, Foy C, Malhotra R, Aldington SJ. The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2448-2453.
15. Murgatroyd H, Cox A, Ellingford A, Ellis JD, Macewen CJ, Leese GP. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy? Eye 2006[Epub ahead of print].
16. Bursell S-E, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, Aiello LM, Joslin Vision Network Research Team. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2001;108:572-585.
17. Lim JI, LaBree L, Nichols T, Cardenas I. A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35-millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:866-870.
18. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: Accuracy of Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology 2002;109:595-601.
19. Rachapalle, SR, Frick, KD, Raman R, Rani PK, Sharma T, Vasudevan M. Mobile teleophthalmology: A cost effective screening tool for diabetic retinopathy in rural south India. e-Health Int 2005;2.
20. Klein R, Klein BEK, Magli YL, Brothers RJ, Meuer SM, Moss SE, Davis MD. An alternative method of grading diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1183-1187.
21. Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2004;111: 1055-1062.
22. ATA Report Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy. Prepared by the American Telemedicine Association, Ocular Telehealth Special Interest Group, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Working Group 1. Telemed e-Health 2004:10.
23. Palacios MJ, Monserrat Bagur S, Badia Llach X, Maseras Bover M, de la Puente Martorell ML, Foz Sala M. Non mydriatic retinal camera: Cost-effectiveness study for early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Med Clin (Barc) 2003;121:446-452.
24. Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, Chang A, Hall L, Mandava N. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Ophthal Epidemiol 2004;11:191-197.