Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: 1 and 3 Nonmydriatic 45-degree Digital Fundus Photographs vs 7 Standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Fields

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 111-118

  Vujosevic, Stela ^a   Benetti, Elisa ^b   Massignan, Francesca ^b   Pilotto, Elisabetta ^b   Varano, Monica ^a   Cavarzeran, Fabiano ^b   Avogaro, Angelo ^b   Midena, Edoardo ^a,b  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYDRIASIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349219648     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.031     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. King H., Aubert R.E., and Hermann W.H. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates and projections. Diabetes Care 21 (1998) 1414-1431
2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ophthalmology 102 (1995) 647-661
3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS Report No. 9. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 766-785
4. American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 116 (1992) 683-685
5. Fong D.S., Aiello L., Gardner T.W., et al., American Diabetes Association. Retinopathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 27 (2004) S84-S87
6. Harris E.L., Sherman S.H., and Georgopoulos A. Black-white differences in risk of developing retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22 (1999) 779-783
7. Varma R., Macias G.L., Torres M., and Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adult Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1298-1306
8. Williams G.A., Scott I.U., Haller J.A., et al. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1055-1062
9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol 103 (1985) 1796-1806
10. Moss S.E., Meuer S.M., Klein R., Hubbard L.D., Brothers R.J., and Klein B.E. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy?. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30 (1989) 823-828
11. Bursell S.E., Cavallaro J.D., and Cavallaro A.A. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 572-585
12. Scanlon P.H., Malhotra R., Greenwood R.H., et al. Comparison of 2 reference standards in validating 2 field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmology 87 (2003) 1258-1263
13. Lin D.Y., Blumenkranz M.S., Brothers R.J., and Grosvenor D.M. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol 134 (2002) 204-213
14. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs-an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS Report No. 10. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 786-806
15. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS Report No. 12. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 823-833
16. Global Diabetic Retinopathy Project Group. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scale. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1677-1682
17. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research (1991), Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, England 1-611
18. Saaddine J.B., Honeycutt A.A., Narayan K.M., et al. Projection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005-2050. Arch Ophthalmol 126 (2008) 1740-1747
19. Bresnick G.H., Mukamel D.B., Dickinson J.C., and Cole D.R. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 19-24
20. Cavallerano J.D., Aiello L.P., Cavallerano A.A., et al. Joslin Vision Network Clinical Team. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 667-673
21. Hildebrand P.L. Discovering optimal telemedicine strategies for evaluating diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 703-704
22. McGlynn E.A., Asch S.M., Adams J., et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 2635-2645
23. Lee P.P., Feldman Z.W., Ostermann J., et al. Longitudinal rates of annual eye examinations of persons with diabetes and chronic eye diseases. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1952-1959
24. Pugh J.A., Jacobson J.M., van Heuven W.A., et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide-angle camera. Diabetes Care 16 (1993) 889-895
25. Harding S.P., Broadbent D.M., Neoh C., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. BMJ 311 (1995) 1131-1135
26. Rudnisky C.J., Tennant M.T., Weis E., et al. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1748-1754
27. Taylor C.R., Merin L.M., Salunga A.M., et al. Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill Study. Diabetes Care 30 (2007) 574-578
28. Murgatroyd H., Ellingford A., Cox A., et al. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 920-924
29. Aptel F., Denis P., Rouberol F., and Thivolet C. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography. Diabetes Metab 34 (2008) 290-293
30. British Diabetic Association. Retinal photographic screening for diabetic eye disease. A British Diabetic Association Report (1997), British Diabetic Association, London, England
31. Scanlon P. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen 15 (2008) 1-4