Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?

Eye

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 344-348

  Murgatroyd, H ^a   Cox, A ^a   Ellingford, A ^a   Ellis, J D ^a   MacEwen, C J ^a   Leese, G P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DARK ADAPTATION; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE COURSE; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INSULIN TREATMENT; LENS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MYDRIASIS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA FOVEA; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; SLIT LAMP; SUBCAPSULAR CATARACT; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 40949165804     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702611     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Evans J, Rooney C, Ashwood F, Battani N, Wormald R. Blindness and partial sight in England and Wales. Health Trends 1996; 38: 5-12.
2. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14 year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 998-1103.
3. James J, Turner D, Broadbent DM, Vora J, Harding S. Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening eye disease. BMJ 2000; 320: 1627-1631.
4. Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, Ferris FL, Canner JK, Greenfield S. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 909-917.
5. Gillow JT, Muir Gray JA. The National screening committee review of diabetic retifiopathy screening. Eye 2001; 15: 1-2.
6. Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald R. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1055-1062.
7. Facey K, Cummins E, Macpherson K, Morris A, Reay C, Slattery J. Organisation of Services for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. Health Technology Assessment Report 1. Health Technology Board for Scotland: Glasgow, 2002. www.htbs.org.uk.
8. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Greenwood RH, Aldington SJ, Foy C, Flatman M et al. Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 1258-1263.
9. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ et al. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 920-924.
10. Potamitis T, Slade S, Fitt A, McLaughlin J, Mallen E, Auld RJ et al The effect of pupil dilation with tropicamide on vision and driving simulator performance. Eye 2000; 14: 302-306.
11. Goel S, Maharajan P, Chua C, Dong B, Butcher M, Bagga P, Driving ability after pupillary dilatation. Eye 2003; 17: 735-738.
12. Razvi S, Myers L, Patton K, McCulloch AJ. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: A cause for concern in people who drive. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 812-815.
13. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831436.
14. Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: The EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetologia 1995; 38: 437-444.
15. Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, Goatman KA, McHardy KC, Forrester JV et al. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 528-534.
16. Williams R, Nussey S, Humphry R, Thompson G. Assessment of non-mydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy, Br Med J 1986; 293: 1140-1142.
17. Schnitzler E, Baumeister M, Kohnen T. Scotopic measurement of normal pupils: Colvard versus Video Vision Analyser infrared pupillometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 859-866.
18. Bitsios P, Prettyman R, Szabadi E. Changes in autonomic function with age: A study of pupillary kinetics in healthy young and old people. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 432-438.
19. Elkington AR, Frank HJ. Clinical Optics, 2nd ed., Chapet 9. Blackwell Science: Oxford, ISBN 0-632-03139-5, 1991.
20. Scanlon P, Foy C, Malhotra R, Aldington S. The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care 2005; 28 2448-2453.