A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy

Ophthalmology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 19-24

  Bresnick, George H ^a   Mukamel, Dana B ^a   Dickinson, John C ^a   Cole, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE FUNDUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA MACULA EDEMA; SCREENING TEST;

DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; MACULAR EDEMA, CYSTOID; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VISION SCREENING;

EID: 0034074322     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00010-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86.
2. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1796-806.
3. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 Suppl):766-85.
4. Ferris F.L. III. How effective are treatments for diabetic retinopathy? JAMA. 269:1993;1290-1291.
5. Vision problems in the U.S.: A report on blindness and vision impairment in adults age 40 and older. Schaumberg, IL: Prevent Blindness America, 1994;12-13.
6. Moss S.E., Klein R., Klein B.E.K. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. 105:1998;998-1003.
7. Anonymous. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1998;21:157-60.
8. Screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, and American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:683-5.
9. Thompson J.W., Bost J., Ahmed F., et al. The NCQA's quality compass evaluating managed care in the United States . Health Affairs. 17:1998;152-158.
10. Weiner J.P., Parente S.T., Garnick D.W., et al. Variation in office-based quality. A claims-based profile of care provided to Medicare patients with diabetes. JAMA. 273:1995;1503-1508.
11. Brechner R.J., Cowie C.C., Howie L.J., et al. Ophthalmic examination among adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 270:1993;1714-1718.
12. Mukamel D.B., Bresnick G.H., Wang Q., Dickey C.F. Barriers to compliance with screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 6:1999;61-72.
13. Sussman E.J., Tsiaris W.G., Soper K.A. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA. 247:1982;3231-3234.
14. Singer D.E., Nathan D.M., Fogel H.A., Schachat A.P. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med. 116:1992;660-671.
15. Nathan D.M., Fogel H.A., Godine J.E., et al. Role of diabetologist in evaluating diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 14:1991;26-33.
16. Awh C.C., Cupples H.P., Javitt J.C. Improved detection and referral of patients with diabetic retinopathy by primary care physicians effectiveness of education . Arch Intern Med. 151:1991;1405-1408.
17. Griffith S.P., Freeman W.L., Shaw C.J., et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography . J Fam Pract. 37:1993;49-56.
18. Baker S.B., Vallbona C., Campbell J.R., et al. Diabetic eye disease detection by primary-care physicians. Diabetes Care. 13:1990;908-909.
19. Klein R., Klein B.E.K., Moss S.E., et al. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol. 102:1984;527-532.
20. Klein R., Klein B.E.K., Moss S.E., et al. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 102:1984;520-526.
21. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:786-806.
22. Moss S.E., Meuer S.M., Klein R., et al. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 30:1989;823-828.
23. Aldington S.J., Kohner E.M., Meuer S., et al. Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study . Diabetologia. 38:1995;437-444.
24. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:823-33.
25. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 1989;John Wiley & Sons, New York.