The MOX promoter in Hansenula polymorpha is ultrasensitive to glucose-mediated carbon catabolite repression

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Dusny, Christian ^a   Schmid, Andreas ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon catabolite repression; Envirostat; Hansenula polymorpha; MOX promoter; Single cell analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON; GLUCOSE; METHANOL; ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; METHANOL OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; CARBON SOURCE; CATABOLITE REPRESSION; ENERGY RESOURCE; GENE REPRESSION; MOX GENE; NONHUMAN; OGATAEA ANGUSTA; PROMOTER REGION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; BIOSYNTHESIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PICHIA;

ALCOHOL OXIDOREDUCTASES; CATABOLITE REPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; PICHIA; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84991035698     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fow067     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ahmad M, Hirz M, Pichler H et al. Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl Microbiol Biot 2014;98:5301-17.
2. Avery SV. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006;4:577-87.
3. Bachmann H, Fischlechner M, Rabbers I et al. Availability of public goods shapes the evolution of competing metabolic strategies. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:14302-7.
4. Carlson M. Glucose repression in yeast. Curr Opin Microbiol 1999;2:202-7.
5. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G et al. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 1994;263:802-5.
6. Colin A, Squires TM, Bocquet L. Soft matter principles of microfluidics. Soft Matter 2012;8:10527-9.
7. CosO, RamonR,Montesinos JL et al. Operational strategies, monitoring and control of heterologous protein production in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris under different promoters: a review. Microb Cell Fact 2006;5:17.
8. Cubitt AB, Heim R, Adams SR et al. Understanding, improving and using green fluorescent proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:448-55.
9. Delvigne F, Goffin P. Microbial heterogeneity affects bioprocess robustness: dynamic single-cell analysis contributes to understanding of microbial populations. Biotechnol J 2014; 9:61-72.
10. Delvigne F, Lejeune A, Destain J et al. Modelling of the substrate heterogeneities experienced by a limited microbial population in scale-down and in large-scale bioreactors. Chem Eng J 2006;120:157-67.
11. Diderich JA, Schepper M, van Hoek P et al. Glucose uptake kinetics and transcription of HXT genes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15350-9.
12. Doran PM. Bioprocess Engineering Principles/Pauline M. Doran. London, SA: Academic Press, 1995.
13. Dunlop EH, Ye SJ. Micromixing in fermentors: metabolic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relationship to fluid turbulence. Biotechnol Bioeng 1990;36:854-64.
14. Dusny C, Fritzsch FS, Frick O et al. Isolated microbial single cells and resulting micropopulations grow faster in controlled environments. Appl Environ Microb 2012;78:7132-6.
15. Dusny C, Schmid A. Microfluidic single-cell analysis links boundary environments and individual microbial phenotypes. Environ Microbiol 2015;17:1839-56.
16. Eggeling L, Sahm H. Derepression and partial insensitivity to carbon catabolite repression of the methanol dissimilating enzymes in Hansenula polymorpha. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1978;5:197-202.
17. Egli T, Vandijken JP, Veenhuis M et al. Methanol metabolism in yeasts-Regulation of the synthesis of catabolic enzymes. Arch Microbiol 1980;124:115-21.
18. ElowitzMB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED et al. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 2002;297:1183-6.
19. Fritzsch FS, Rosenthal K, Kampert A et al. Picoliter nDEP traps enable time-resolved contactless single bacterial cell analysis in controlled microenvironments. Lab Chip 2013;13: 397-408.
20. Gefen O, Fridman O, Ronin I et al. Direct observation of single stationary-phase bacteria reveals a surprisingly long period of constant protein production activity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:556-61.
21. Gellissen G. Heterologous protein production in methylotrophic yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biot 2000;54:741-50.
22. Gellissen G, Kunze G, Gaillardin C et al. New yeast expression platforms based on methylotrophic Hansenula polymorpha and Pichia pastoris and on dimorphic Arxula adeninivorans and Yarrowia lipolytica-a comparison. FEMS Yeast Res 2005;5:1079-96.
23. Genu V, Godecke S,Hollenberg CP et al. The Hansenula polymorpha MOX gene presents two alternative transcription start points differentially utilized and sensitive to respiratory activity. Eur J Biochem 2003;270:2467-75.
24. Gruenberger A, Wiechert W, Kohlheyer D. Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014;29C:15-23.
25. Jaeger MS, Mueller T, Schnelle T. Thermometry in dielectrophoresis chips for contact-free cell handling. J Phys D Appl Phys 2007;40:95-105.
26. Jones JG, Bellion E. Methylamine metabolism in Hansenula polymorpha: an in vivo 13C and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study. J Bacteriol 1991;173:4959-69.
27. Karp H, Alamae T. Glucose transport in a methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1998;166:267-73.
28. Kensy F, Engelbrecht C, Buchs J. Scale-up from microtiter plate to laboratory fermenter: evaluation by online monitoring techniques of growth and protein expression in Escherichia coli and Hansenula polymorpha fermentations. Microb Cell Fact 2009;8:68.
29. Kochanowski K, Volkmer B, Gerosa L et al. Functioning of a metabolic flux sensor in Escherichia coli. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:1130-5.
30. Kortmann H, Chasanis P, Blank LM et al. The Envirostat-a new bioreactor concept. Lab Chip 2009;9:576-85.
31. Kramarenko T, Karp H, Jarviste A et al. Sugar repression in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha studied by using hexokinase-negative, glucokinase-negative and double kinase-negative mutants. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2000; 45:521-9.
32. Laht S, Karp H, Kotka P et al. Cloning and characterization of glucokinase from a methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha: different effects on glucose repression in H. polymorpha and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 2002;296:195-203.
33. Lara AR, Galindo E, Ramirez OT et al. Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors: understanding the effects of environmental gradients on cells. Mol Biotechnol 2006;34:355-81.
34. Lindmeyer M, Meyer D, Kuhn D et al. Making variability less variable: matching expression system and host for oxygenasebased biotransformations. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2015;42:851-66.
35. Locke JC, Elowitz MB. Using movies to analyse gene circuit dynamics in single cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009;7:383-92.
36. Lundberg P, Kuchel PW. Diffusion of solutes in agarose and alginate gels: 1H and 23Na PFGSE and 23Na TQF NMR studies. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:44-52.
37. Mattanovich D, Branduardi P, Dato L et al. Recombinant protein production in yeasts. Methods Mol Biol 2012;824:329-58.
38. Mayer AF, Hellmuth K, Schlieker H et al. An expression system matures: a highly efficient and cost-effective process for phytase production by recombinant strains of Hansenula polymorpha. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999;63:373-81.
39. Nanchen A, Schicker A, Sauer U. Nonlinear dependency of intracellular fluxes on growth rate in miniaturized continuous cultures of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 2006;72: 1164-72.
40. Narula J, Devi SN, Fujita M et al. Ultrasensitivity of the Bacillus subtilis sporulation decision. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:E3513-22.
41. Nielsen J. Production of biopharmaceutical proteins by yeast: advances through metabolic engineering. Bioengineered 2013;4:207-11.
42. Nikel PI, Silva-Rocha R, Benedetti I et al. The private life of environmental bacteria: pollutant biodegradation at the single cell level. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:628-42.
43. Okabe Y, Sasai M. Stable Stochastic dynamics in yeast cell cycle. Biophys J 2007;93:3451-9.
44. Ozbudak EM, ThattaiM, Lim HN et al. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature 2004;427:737-40.
45. Pohl HA, Hawk I. Separation of living and dead cells by dielectrophoresis. Science 1966;152:647-9
46. Rolland F, De Winde JH, Lemaire K et al. Glucose-induced cAMP signalling in yeast requires both a G-protein coupled receptor system for extracellular glucose detection and a separable hexose kinase-dependent sensing process. Mol Microbiol 2000;38:348-58.
47. Schmid A, Kortmann H, Dittrich PS et al. Chemical and biological single cell analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010;21:12-20.
48. Schnelle T, Muller T, Fuhr G. Trapping in AC octode field cages. J Electrostat 2000;50:17-29
49. Stasyk OG, Maidan MM, Stasyk OV et al. Identification of hexose transporter-like sensor HXS1 and functional hexose transporter HXT1 in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Eukaryote Cell 2008;7:735-46.
50. Stockmann C, Scheidle M, Dittrich B et al. Process development in Hansenula polymorpha and Arxula adeninivorans, a reassessment. Microb Cell Fact 2009;8:22.
51. Suppi S, Michelson T, Viigand K et al. Repression vs activation of MOX, FMD, MPP1 andMAL1 promoters by sugars in Hansenula polymorpha: the outcome depends on cell's ability of sugar phosphorylation. FEMS Yeast Res 2013;13:219-32.
52. Swain PS, ElowitzMB, Siggia ED. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:12795-800.
53. Teusink B, Diderich JA,Westerhoff HV et al. Intracellular glucose concentration in derepressed yeast cells consuming glucose is high enough to reduce the glucose transport rate by 50%. J Bacteriol 1998;180:556-62.
54. Weibel DB, Diluzio WR, Whitesides GM. Microfabrication meets microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007;5:209-18.
55. Westerwalbesloh C, Grunberger A, Stute B et al. Modeling and CFD simulation of nutrient distribution in picoliter bioreactors for bacterial growth studies on single-cell level. Lab Chip 2015;15:4177-86.
56. Yamada Y, Maeda K, Mikata K. The phylogenetic relationships of the hat-shaped ascospore-forming, nitrate-assimilating Pichia species, formerly classified in the genus Hansenula Sydow et Sydow, based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae): the proposals of three new genera, Ogataea, Kuraishia, and Nakazawaea. Biosci Biotech Bioch 1994;58:1245-57.
57. Young JW, Locke JC, Altinok A et al. Measuring single-cell gene expression dynamics in bacteria using fluorescence timelapse microscopy. Nat Protoc 2012;7:80-8.
58. Zurek C, Kubis E, Keup P et al. Production of two aprotinin variants in Hansenula polymorpha. Proc Biochem 1996;31:679-89.