Isolated microbial single cells and resulting micropopulations grow: Faster in controlled environments

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 19, 2012, Pages 7132-7136

  Dusny, Christian ^a   Fritzsch, Frederik Sven Ole ^a   Frick, Oliver ^a   Schmid, Andreas ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTANT CONDITIONS; CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT; CORYNEBACTERIUM GLUTAMICUM; EXTRACELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS; HANSENULA POLYMORPHA; PICHIA PASTORIS; SINGLE CELLS; SINGLECELL ANALYSIS; SPECIFIC GROWTH RATE;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

MICROBIOLOGY;

CELL ORGANELLE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GROWTH RATE; METAPOPULATION; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION STRUCTURE; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CORYNEBACTERIUM GLUTAMICUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROCLIMATE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

CORYNEBACTERIUM GLUTAMICUM; ENVIRONMENT, CONTROLLED; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

CORYNEBACTERIUM GLUTAMICUM; PICHIA ANGUSTA; PICHIA PASTORIS;

EID: 84868317361     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01624-12     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Acar M, Mettetal JT, Oudenaarden Av. 2008. Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat. Genet. 40:471-475.
2. Avery SV. 2006. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:577-587.
3. Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S. 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305:1622-1625.
4. Berg TGO, Ljunggren B. 1982. The rate of growth of a single yeast-cell. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24:2739-2741.
5. Bishop AL, Rab FA, Sumner ER, Avery SV. 2007. Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in 'stress-sensitive' yeast populations. Mol. Microbiol. 63:507-520.
6. Boedicker JQ, Vincent ME, Ismagilov RF. 2009. Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. Angew. Chem. Int. ed. 48:5908-5911.
7. Borland LM, Kottegoda S, Phillips KS, Allbritton NL. 2008. Chemical analysis of single cells. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1:191-227.
8. Buck JW, Andrews JH. 1999. Attachment of the yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides is mediated by adhesives localized at sites of bud cell development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:465-471.
9. Button DK, Schut F, Quang P, Martin R, Robertson BR. 1993. Viability and isolation of marine bacteria by dilution culture: theory, procedures, and initial results. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:881-891.
10. Cai L, Friedman N, Xie XS. 2006. Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 440:358-362.
11. Dunlop EH, Ye SJ. 1990. Micromixing in fermentors: metabolic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relationship to fluid turbulence. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 36:854-864.
12. Elfwing A, LeMarc Y, Baranyi J, Ballagi A. 2004. Observing growth and division of large numbers of individual bacteria by image analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:675-678.
13. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183-1186.
14. Enfors SO, et al. 2001. Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. J. Biotechnol. 85:175-185.
15. Fritzsch FSO, Dusny C, Frick O, Schmid A. 2012. Single-cell analysis in biotechnology, systems biology, and biocatalysis. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 3:129-155.
16. Gefen O, Balaban NQ. 2009. The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial populations under antibiotic stress. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33:704-717.
17. Grunberger A, et al. A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level. Lab. Chip 12:2060-2068
18. Ibarra RU, Edwards JS, Palsson BO. 2002. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 420:186-189.
19. Jaeger MS, Uhlig K, Schnelle T, Mueller T. 2008. Contact-free single-cell cultivation by negative dielectrophoresis. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41:8.
20. Jones SB, Adolph EF. 1932. Growth in size of micro organisms measured from motion pictures I Yeast, Saccharose cerevisiae. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 1:387-407.
21. Kacmar J, Gilbert A, Cockrell J, Srienc F. 2006. The cytostat: a new way to study cell physiology in a precisely defined environment. J. Biotechnol. 126:163-172.
22. Kacmar J, Zamamiri A, Carlson R, Abu-Absi NR, Srienc F. 2004. Single-cell variability in growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell populations measured with automated flow cytometry. J. Biotechnol. 109:239-254.
23. Karp H, Alamae T. 1998. Glucose transport in a methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166:267-273.
24. Kortmann H, et al. 2009. The Envirostat-a new bioreactor concept. Lab. Chip 9:576-585.
25. Lara AR, Galindo E, Ramirez OT, Palomares LA. 2006. Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors. Mol. Biotechnol. 34:355-381.
26. Li XZ, Hauer B, Rosche B. 2007. Single-species microbial biofilm screening for industrial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 76:1255-1262.
27. Lidstrom ME, Konopka MC. 2010. The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6:705-712.
28. Lindegren CC, Haddad SA. 1954. Growth rates of individual yeast cells. Genetica 27:45-53.
29. Lindstrom S, Andersson-Svahn H. 2010. Overview of single-cell analyses: microdevices and applications. Lab. Chip 10:3363-3372.
30. Lord PG, Wheals AE. 1981. Variability in individual cell-cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 50:361-376.
31. Love JC. 2010. Integrated process design for single-cell analytical technologies. AICHE J. 56:2496-2502.
32. Mannik J, Driessen R, Galajda P, Keymer JE, Dekker C. 2009. Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:14861-14866.
33. Mitchison JM. 1958. The growth of single cells. 2. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res. 15:214-221.
34. Mitchison JM, Nurse P. 1985. Growth in cell length in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 75:357-376.
35. Monod J. 1949. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 3:371-394.
36. Muller S, Harms H, Bley T. 2010. Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21: 100-113.
37. Muller T, et al. 2003. The potential of dielectrophoresis for single-cell experiments. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 22:51-61.
38. Newman JRS, et al. 2006. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-846.
39. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. 2000. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:49-79.
40. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A. 2002. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat. Genet. 31:69-73.
41. Peitz I, van Leeuwen R. 2010. Single-cell bacteria growth monitoring by automated DEP-facilitated image analysis. Lab. Chip 10:2944-2951.
42. Schmid A, Kortmann H, Dittrich PS, Blank LM. 2010. Chemical and biological single cell analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21:12-20.
43. Schnelle T, Hagedorn R, Fuhr G, Fiedler S, Muller T. 1993. Threedimensional electric field traps for manipulation of cells- calculation and experimental verification. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1157:127-140.
44. Siegal-Gaskins D, Crosson S. 2008. Tightly regulated and heritable division control in single bacterial cells. Biophys. J. 95:2063-2072.
45. Swain PS, Elowitz MB, Siggia ED. 2002. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:12795-12800.
46. Wang P, et al. 2010. Robust growth of Escherichia coli. Curr. Biol. 20: 1099-1103.
47. Wheals AE, Lord PG. 1992. Clonal heterogeneity in specific growth rate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Cell Prolif. 25:217-223.