Multinational investigation of crosssocietal cooperation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 39, 2016, Pages 10836-10841

  Dorrough, Angela Rachael ^a,b,c   Glöckner, Andreas ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Culture; Prisoner's dilemma; Social dilemmas; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; EXPECTATION; GERMANY; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; HUMAN; INDIA; INTERGROUP BIAS; ISRAEL; JAPAN; MEXICO; NORMAL HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISONER; SOCIAL STATUS; STEREOTYPY; UNITED STATES; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; ORGANIZATION;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERNATIONALITY; SOCIETIES;

EID: 84989834806     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1601294113     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243-1248.
2. Sally D (1995) Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Ration Soc 7(1):58-92.
3. Kreps DM, Milgrom PR, Roberts J, Wilson RB (1982) Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. J Econ Theory 27(2):245-252.
4. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817-868.
5. Dawes CT, Fowler JH, Johnson T, McElreath R, Smirnov O (2007) Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature 446(7137):794-796.
6. Van Lange PAM (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(2):337-349.
7. Pruitt DG, Kimmel MJ (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annu Rev Psychol 28:363-392.
8. Bogaert S, Boone C, Declerck C (2008) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. Br J Soc Psychol 47(3):453-480.
9. Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325-383.
10. Fischer I, et al. (2013) Fusing enacted and expected mimicry generates a winning strategy that promotes the evolution of cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(25): 10229-10233.
11. Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90(1):166-193.
12. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA (2014) Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 18(1):13-41.
13. Hilbig BE, Glöckner A, Zettler I (2014) Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol 107(3):529-539.
14. Brewer MB, Kramer RM (1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(3):543-549.
15. Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CK (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(6):1556-1581.
16. Fershtman C, Gneezy U, Verboven F (2005) Discrimination and nepotism: The efficiency of the anonymity rule. J Legal Stud 34(2):371-396.
17. Takahashi C, et al. (2008) The intercultural trust paradigm: Studying joint cultural interaction and social exchange in real time over the Internet. Int J Intercult Relat 32(3):215-228.
18. Ashmore RD, Del Boca FK (1981) Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior, ed Hamilton DL (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp 1-35.
19. McCrae RR, Terracciano A (2006) National character and personality. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(5745):156-161.
20. Gilbert GM (1951) Stereotype persistence and change among college students. J Abnorm Psychol 46(2):245-254.
21. Madon S, et al. (2001) Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(8):996-1010.
22. Terracciano A, et al. (2005) National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science 310(5745):96-100.
23. Hennig-Schmidt H, Selten R, Walkowitz G, Winter E, Dakkak I (2007) Actions and beliefs in a trilateral trust game involving Germans, Israelis and Palestinians. Working Paper, Bonn University. Available at static.luiss.it/esa2007/programme/papers/221. pdf. Accessed August 18, 2016.
24. Hedden T, Zhang J (2002) What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85(1):1-36.
25. Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. Am Econ Rev 100(1):541-556.
26. Chudek M, Henrich J (2011) Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends Cogn Sci 15(5):218-226.
27. Buchan NR, Johnson JE, Croson RTA (2006) Let's get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. J Econ Behav Organ 60(3):373-398.
28. Gächter S, Herrmann B (2009) Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: Previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1518):791-806.
29. Henrich J, et al. (2001) In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev 91(2):73-78.
30. Gächter S, Herrmann B, Thöni C (2010) Culture and cooperation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1553):2651-2661.
31. House BR, et al. (2013) Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(36):14586-14591.
32. Liu JH, et al. (2001) Unbalanced triangle in the social dilemma of trust: Internet studies of real-time real money social exchange between China, Japan, and Taiwan. Asian J Soc Psychol 14(4):246-257.
33. Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Q J Econ 116(1):351-377.
34. Buchan NR, et al. (2009) Globalization and human cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(11):4138-4142.
35. Wahl LM, Nowak MA (1999) The continuous prisoner's dilemma: I. Linear reactive strategies. J Theor Biol 200(3):307-321.
36. Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Quercia S (2012) The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments. J Econ Psychol 33(4):897-913.
37. Yamagishi T, et al. (2005) Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group-based cooperation. Asian J Soc Psychol 8(2):173-190.
38. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 33(2-3):61-83, discussion 83-135.
39. Falk A, Meier S, Zehnder C (2013) Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(4):839-852.
40. Hofstede G (1983) Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. Expiscations in Cross-Cultural Psychology, eds Deregowksi JB, Dziurawiec S, Annis RC (Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands), pp 335-355.
41. Cuddy AJ, et al. (2009) Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. Br J Soc Psychol 48(1):1-33.
42. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cogn Sci 11(2):77-83.
43. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Pers Soc Psychol 82(6):878-902.
44. Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P (2007) The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(4):631-648.
45. Tajfel H (1974) Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Soc Sci Inf (Paris) 13(2):65-93.
46. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York).
47. Costa A, Foucart A, Arnon I, Aparici M, Apesteguia J (2014) "Piensa" twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition 130(2):236-254.