The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 897-913

  Fischbacher, Urs ^a,b   Gächter, Simon ^c,d,e   Quercia, Simone ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b University of Konstanz and Thurgau Institute of Economics   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d CESIFO   (Germany)

^e IZA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional cooperators; Direct response method; Experimental methodology; Free riders; Public goods experiments; Strategy method; Voluntary cooperation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861217730     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ambrus A., Pathak P.A. Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments. Journal of Public Economics 2011, 95:500-512.
2. Bardsley N., Moffatt P.G. The experimetrics of public goods: Inferring motivations from contributions. Theory and Decision 2007, 62:161-193.
3. Brandts J., Charness G. Hot vs. Cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics 2000, 2:227-238.
4. Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2011). The strategy versus the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics, 1-24.
5. Brandts J., Schram A. Cooperation and noise in public goods experiments: Applying the contribution function approach. Journal of Public Economics 2001, 79:399-427.
6. Brosig J., Weimann J., Yang C.-L. The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experimental Economics 2003, 6:75-90.
7. Burlando R.M., Guala F. Heterogeneous agents in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics 2005, 8:35-54.
8. Chaudhuri A. Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics 2011, 14:47-83.
9. Chaudhuri A., Paichayontvijit T. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good. Economics Bulletin 2006, 3:1-15.
10. Duffy J., Ochs J. Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction. Games and Economic Behavior 2009, 66:785-812.
11. Engelmann D., Strobel M. The false consensus effect disappears if representative information and monetary incentives are given. Experimental Economics 2000, 3:241-260.
12. Fischbacher U. Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Experimental Economics 2007, 10:171-178.
13. Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. CeDEx Discussion Paper 2006-01, University of Nottingham.
14. Fischbacher U., Gächter S. Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments. American Economic Review 2010, 100:541-556.
15. Fischbacher U., Gächter S., Fehr E. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters 2001, 71:397-404.
16. Gächter, S., & Herrmann, B. (2009). Reciprocity, culture, and human cooperation: Previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B - Biological Sciences, 364, 791-806.
17. Gächter S., Renner E. The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics 2010, 13:364-377.
18. Gächter S., Thöni C. Social comparison and performance. Experimental evidence on the fair wage-effort hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2010, 76:531-543.
19. Goeree J.K., Holt C.A., Laury S.K. Private costs and public benefits: Unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. Journal of Public Economics 2002, 83:255-276.
20. Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In Kremer, K., Macho, V., (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen. GWDG Bericht 63. Göttingen: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, pp. 79-93.
21. Grimm V., Mengel F. Cooperation in viscous populations-experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 2009, 66:202-220.
22. Healy P.J. Group reputations, stereotypes, and cooperation in a repeated labor market. American Economic Review 2007, 97:1751-1773.
23. Herrmann B., Thöni C. Measuring conditional cooperation: A replication study in Russia. Experimental Economics 2009, 12:87-92.
24. Kelley H., Stahelski A. Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970, 16:190-219.
25. Kocher M.G., Cherry T., Kroll S., Netzer R.J., Sutter M. Conditional cooperation on three continents. Economics Letters 2008, 101:175-178.
26. Kurzban R., Houser D. An experimental investigation of cooperative types in human groups: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. PNAS 2005, 102:1803-1807.
27. Levati M.V., Zultan R.I. Cycles of conditional cooperation in a real-time voluntary contribution mechanism. Games 2011, 2:1-15.
28. Muller L., Sefton M., Steinberg R., Vesterlund L. Strategic behavior and learning in repeated voluntary-contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2008, 67:782-793.
29. Neugebauer T., Perote J., Schmidt U., Loos M. Self-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of cooperation in repeated public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology 2009, 30:52-60.
30. Ockenfels A. Fairness, Reziprozität und Eigennutz - ökonomische Theorie und experimentelle Evidenz 1999, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
31. Offerman T., Sonnemans J., Schram A. Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods. Economic Journal 1996, 106:817-845.
32. Palfrey T.R., Prisbrey J.E. Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: How much and why?. American Economic Review 1997, 87:829-846.
33. Park E.-S. Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: A further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2000, 43:405-421.
34. Reuben E., Suetens S. Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation. Experimental Economics 2012, 15:24-43.
35. Roth, A. E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In Kagel, J. H., Roth, A. E., (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 253-348.
36. Rustagi D., Engel S., Kosfeld M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 2010, 330:961-965.
37. Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperimentes. In Sauermann, H., (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 136-168.
38. Sonnemans J., Schram A., Offerman T. Strategic behavior in public good games: When partners drift apart. Economics Letters 1999, 62:35-41.
39. Thöni, C., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2009). Microfoundations of social capital. Discussion Paper No. 09-24, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
40. van Dijk F., Sonnemans J., van Winden F. Social ties in a public good experiment. Journal of Public Economics 2002, 85:275-299.
41. Volk S., Thöni C., Ruigrok W. Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2012, 81:664-676.
42. Zelmer J. Linear public goods experiments: A meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 2003, 6:299-310.