Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group-based cooperation

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 173-190

  Yamagishi, Toshio ^a   Makimura, Yosuke ^a   Foddy, Margaret ^b   Matsuda, Masafumi ^c   Kiyonari, Toko ^d   Platow, Michael J ^e  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c NTT CORPORATION   (Japan)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cross cultural experiment; In group favoritism; Inter group relationship; Prisoner's dilemma; Reciprocity; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744453709     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839x.2005.00165.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
2. Amancio, L. (1989). Social differentiation between 'dominant' and 'dominated' groups: Toward an integration of social stereotypes and social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 1-10.
3. Billig, M. & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
4. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In: M. B. Brewer & B. Collins, eds. Scientific Inquiry in the Social Sciences, pp. 214-231. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
6. Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effect of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 50, 593-604.
7. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
8. Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A. & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strategies: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 168-206.
9. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
10. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992), Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby, eds. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp. 163-228. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. de Cremer, D. & van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
12. Deaux, K. (2000). Models, meanings and motivations. In: D. Capozza & R. Brown, eds. Social Identify Processes: Trends in Theory and Research, pp. 1-14. London: Sage.
13. Diehl, M. (1989). Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: The limits of equity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-238.
14. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
15. Foddy, M. & Hogg, M. (1999). Impact of leaders on resource consumption in social dilemmas: The intergroup context. In: M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider & M. Hogg, eds. Resolving Social Dilemmas, pp. 309-330. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16. Hagen, J. M. & Choe, S. (1998). Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review, 23, 589-600.
17. Hartstone, M. & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 179-193.
18. Hewstone, M., Argyle, M. & Furnham, A. (1982). Favouritism, fairness and joint profit in long-term relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 283-295.
19. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
20. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity. New York: Harvester.
21. Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (1988), Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
22. Huff, L. & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organizational Science, 14, 81-90.
23. Insko, C. A. & Schopler, J. (1998). Personal control, entitativity, and evolution. In: C. Sedikides, J. Schopler & C. A. Insko, eds. Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, pp. 75-107. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J. & Sedikides, C. (1998). Personal control, entitativity, and evolution. In: C. Sedikides, J. Schopler & C. A. Insko, eds. Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, pp. 109-122. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Jin, N. & Yamagishi, T. (1997). Group heuristics in social dilemma. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 190-198 (in Japanese with an English abstract).
26. Jin, N., Yamagishi, T. & Kiyonari, T. (1996). Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-85 (in Japanese with an English abstract).
27. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review of social integration. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
28. Karp, D., Jin, N., Yamagishi, T. & Shinotsuka, H. (1993). Raising the minimum in the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 231-240.
29. Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. C., Gelfand, J. M. & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
30. Kim, Y. & Son, J. (1998). Trust, cooperation and social risk: A cross-cultural comparison. Korea Journal, 38, 131-153.
31. Kiyonari, T. (2002). Expectations of a generalized exchange system and ingroup favoritism: An experimental study of bounded reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 1-9 (in Japanese with an English abstract).
32. Kiyonari, T., Tanida, S. & Yamagishi, T. (2000). Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 411-427.
33. Kollock, P. (1997). Transforming social dilemmas: Group identity and cooperation. In: P. Danielson, ed. Modeling Rational and Moral Agents, pp. 186-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191-228.
35. Kramer, R. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
36. Kramer, R. M. & Goldman, L. (1995). Helping the group or helping yourself? Social motives and group identity in resource dilemmas. In: D. A. Schroeder, ed. Social Dilemmas: Perspectives on Individuals and Groups, pp. 46-67. Westport, CT: Praeger.
37. Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P. & Newton, E. (1993). Effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
38. Leyens, J-P., Yzerbyt, V. & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes Social Cognition. London: Sage.
39. Makimura, Y. & Yamagishi, T. (2002). Ongoing group interaction, ingroup favoritism, and reward allocation. A study of ingroup favoritism with on-going interactions: A reward allocation experiment. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 488-493 (in Japanese with an English abstract).
40. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
41. Meade, R. D. (1985). Experimental studies of authoritarian and democratic leadership in four cultures: American, Indian, Chinese and Chinese-American. High School Journal, 68, 293-295.
42. Mullen, B., Brown, R. & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
43. Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-308.
44. Oakes, P. J. & Turner, J. C. (1990). Is limited information processing the cause of social stereotyping. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 111-135.
45. Platow, M. J., Harley, K., Hunter, J. A., Hanning, P., Shave, R. & O'Connell, A. (1997). Interpreting ingroup-favouring allocations in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 107-118.
46. Putnam, R. D. (1994). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Rubin, M. & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
48. Singh, R., Choo, W. M. & Poh, L. L. (1999). In-group bias and fair-mindedness as strategies of self-presentation in intergroup perception. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 147-162.
49. Smith, P. B. & Bond, M. H. (1999). Social Psychology Across Cultures, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
50. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
51. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel & W. G. Austin, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Behavior, pp. 7-24. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
52. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
53. Toda, M., Shinotsuka, H., McClintock, C. G. & Stech, F. J. (1978). Development of competitive behavior as a function of culture, age, and social comparison. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 36, 825-839.
54. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: West View.
55. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.
56. Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J. & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
57. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
58. van Vugt, M. & de Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
59. Wit, A. P. & Wilke, H. A. (1992). The effect of social categorization on cooperation in three types of social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 135-151.
60. Yamagishi, T. (1988a). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 32-42.
61. Yamagishi, T. (1988b). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the public good problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530-542.
62. Yamagishi, T. (1998). Trust: The Evolutionary Game of Mind Society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press (in Japanese).
63. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N. & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances Ingroup Processes, 16, 161-197.
64. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N. & Miller, A. S. (1998). Ingroup favoritism and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 315-328.
65. Yamagishi, T. & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.
66. Yamagishi, T. & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.