CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.)

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Ren, Chong ^a,b   Liu, Xianju ^a,b   Zhang, Zhan ^a,b   Wang, Yi ^a,b   Duan, Wei ^a   Li, Shaohua ^a   Liang, Zhenchang ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXIDOREDUCTASE; PLANT PROTEIN; TARTARIC ACID; TARTARIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

BIOSYNTHESIS; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GENETICS; INDEL MUTATION; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENOME; TRANSGENIC PLANT; VITIS;

BASE SEQUENCE; BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GENOME, PLANT; INDEL MUTATION; MUTAGENESIS; OXIDOREDUCTASES; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; TARTRATES; VITIS;

EID: 84985018861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep32289     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247-271 (2011).
2. Townsend, J. A. et al. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 442-445 (2009).
3. Shan, Q. et al. Rapid and efficient gene modification in rice and Brachypodium using TALENs. Mol. Plant 6, 1365-1368 (2013).
4. Zhang, Y. et al. Transcription activator-like effector nucleases enable efficient plant genome engineering. Plant Physiol. 161, 20-27 (2013).
5. De Francesco, L. Erratum: Move over ZFNs. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 112 (2012).
6. Chen, K. L. & Gao, C. Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Rep. 33, 575-583 (2014).
7. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
8. Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 670-676 (2014).
9. Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. R. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397-405 (2013).
10. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
11. Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156, 935-949 (2014).
12. Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C. & Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62-67 (2014).
13. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).
14. Wei, C. et al. TALEN or Cas9-rapid, efficient and specific choice for genome modifications. J. Genet. Genomics 40, 281-289 (2013).
15. Hwang, W. Y. et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotech. 31, 227-229 (2013).
16. Yang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas mediated genome engineering. Cell 154, 1370-1379 (2013).
17. Feng, Z. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1229-1232 (2013).
18. Mao, Y. et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol. Plant 6, 2008-2011 (2013).
19. Li, J. F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688-691 (2013).
20. Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. G. & Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 691-693 (2013).
21. Jiang, W. Z. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic. Acids Res. 41, e188 (2013).
22. Miao, J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1233-1236 (2013).
23. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).
24. Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J. & Parrott, W. A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 15, 16 (2015).
25. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B. & VanEck, J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated 9 system. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292-1297 (2014).
26. Pan, C. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations. Sci. Rep. 6, 24765 (2016).
27. Feng, Z. et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4632-4637 (2014).
28. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J 12, 797-807 (2014).
29. Shan, Q. W., Wang, Y. P., Li, J. & Gao, C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2395-2410 (2014).
30. Fan, D. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Sci. Rep. 5, 12217 (2015).
31. Jia, H. & Wang, N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLOS One 9, e93806 (2014).
32. Jaillon, O. et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggest ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463-465 (2007).
33. Ferreira, A. A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Res. 9, 245-260 (2000).
34. Vidal, J. R. et al. Use of gene transfer technology for functional studies in grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 16, 138-151 (2010).
35. Mullins, M. G., Archie Tang, F. C. & Facciotti, D. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of grapevine: transgenic plants of Vitis rupestris Scheele and buds of Vitis vinifera L. Biotechnology 8, 1041-1045 (1990).
36. Harst, M., Bornhoff, B-A., Zyprian, E. & Topfer, R. Influence of culture technique and genotype on efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos (Vitis vinifera) and their conversion to transgenic plants. Vitis 29, 99-102 (2000).
37. Torregrosa, L., Iocco, P. & Thomas, M. R. Influence of Agrobacterium strain, culture medium, and cultivars on the transformation efficiency of Vitis vinifera L. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 53, 183-190 (2002).
38. Ma, X. et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficient multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).
39. Dai, L. et al. Establishment of a picloram-induced somatic embryogenesis system in Vitis vinifera cv. chardonnay and genetic transformation of a stilbene synthase gene from wild-growing Vitis species. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 121, 397-412 (2015).
40. Debolt, S., Cook, D. R. & Ford, C. M. L-tartaric acid synthesis from vitamin C in higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5608-5613 (2006).
41. Ma, X., Chen, L., Zhu, Q. & Liu, Y. Rapid decoding of sequence-specific nuclease-induced heterozygous and biallelic mutations by direct sequencing of PCR products. Mol. Plant 8, 1285-1287 (2015).
42. Iocco, P., Franks, T. & Thomas, M. R. Genetic transformation of major wine grape cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. Transgenic Res. 10, 105-112 (2001).
43. Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262-1267 (2014).
44. Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187-197 (2015).
45. Osakabe, Y. et al. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants. Sci. Rep. 6, 26685 (2016).
46. Pattanayak, V. et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 839-843 (2013).
47. Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822-826 (2013).
48. Sun, X. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 5, 10342 (2015).
49. Xu, R. et al. Generation of inheritable and "transgene clean" targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Sci. Rep. 5, 11491 (2015).
50. Kuscu, C., Arslan, S., Singh, R., Thorpe, J. & Adli, M. Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 677-683 (2014).
51. Xie, K., Zhang, J. & Yang, Y. Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops. Mol. Plant 7, 923-926 (2014).
52. Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 79, 348-359 (2014).
53. Mei, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Sun, Z. S. & Ju X. D. Recent Progress in CRISPR/Cas9 Technology. J. Genet. Genomics 43, 63-75 (2016).
54. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
55. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013).
56. Wang, Y. et al. Identification of genomic sites for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in the Vitis vinifera genome. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 96 (2016).
57. Lei, Y. et al. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 7, 1494-1496 (2014).
58. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).