Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Osakabe, Yuriko ^a,b   Watanabe, Takahito ^b   Sugano, Shigeo S ^b   Ueta, Risa ^b   Ishihara, Ryosuke ^b   Shinozaki, Kazuo ^a   Osakabe, Keishi ^b  

^a Elements Chemistry Laboratory   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE EDITING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

ARABIDOPSIS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EDITING; GENOME, PLANT; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84971280492     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep26685     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
2. DiCarlo, J. E. et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4336-4343 (2013).
3. Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P., Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2579-E2586 (2012).
4. Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
5. Li, J. F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688-691 (2013).
6. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013a).
7. Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D., Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNAguided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 691-693 (2013).
8. Sugano, S. S. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 475-481 (2014).
9. Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 389-400 (2015).
10. Feng, Z. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Res. 23, 1229-1232 (2013).
11. Mao, Y. et al. Application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol. Plant 6, 2008-2011 (2013).
12. Jiang, W. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e188 (2013).
13. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).
14. Upadhyay, S. K., Kumar, J., Alok, A., Tuli, R. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3 Bethesda 3, 2233-2238 (2013).
15. Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Chen, K., Gao, C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J. Genet. Genom. 41, 63-68 (2014).
16. Jia, H., Wang, N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. Plos ONE 9: e93806 (2014).
17. Cai, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Soybean Hairy Roots. Plos ONE 10, e0136064 (2015).
18. Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J., Parrott, W. A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 15: 16 (2015).
19. Fan, D. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation. Sci. Rep. 5, 12217 (2015).
20. Zhou, X., Jacobs, T. B., Xue, L. J., Harding, S. A., Tsai, C. J. Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate: CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytol. 208, 298-301 (2015).
21. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR/Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013).
22. Fu, Y., Sander, J. D., Reyon, D., Cascio, V. M., Joung, J. K. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 279-284 (2014).
23. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
24. Mali, P. et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 833-838 (2013b).
25. Pattanayak, V. et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 839-843 (2013).
26. Fauser, F., Schiml, S., Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359 (2014).
27. Schiml, S., Fauser, F., Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80, 1139-1150 (2014).
28. Merlot, S. et al. Constitutive activation of a plasma membrane H(+ )-ATPase prevents abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. EMBO J. 26, 3216-3226 (2007).
29. Palmgren, M. G. Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 52, 817-845 (2001).
30. Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K., Shinozaki, K., Tran, L. S. Response of plants to water stress. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 86 (2014).
31. Baxter, I. et al. Genomic comparison of P-type ATPase ion pumps in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 132, 618-628 (2003).
32. Pedersen, B. P., Buch-Pedersen, M. J., Morth, J. P., Palmgren, M. G., Nissen, P. Crystal structure of the plasma membrane proton pump. Nature 450, 1111-1114 (2007).
33. Svennelid, F. et al. Phosphorylation of Thr-948 at the C terminus of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase creates a binding site for the regulatory 14-3-3 protein. Plant Cell. 11, 2379-2391 (1999).
34. Duda, K. et al. High-efficiency genome editing via 2A-coupled co-expression of fluorescent proteins and zinc finger nucleases or CRISPR/Cas9 nickase pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e84 (2014).
35. Osakabe, K., Osakabe, Y., Toki, S. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12034-12039 (2010).
36. Wind, J. J., Peviani, A., Snel, B., Hanson, J., Smeekens, S. C. ABI4: versatile activator and repressor. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 125-132 (2013).
37. Xia, Y. et al. The glabra1 Mutation Affects Cuticle Formation and Plant Responses to Microbes. Plant Physiol. 154, 833-846 (2010).
38. Xiao, A. et al. CasOT: a genome-wide Cas9/gRNA off-target searching tool. Bioinformatics 30, 1180-1182 (2014).
39. Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262-1267 (2014).
40. Wilkinson, J. E., Twell, D., Lindsey, K. Activities of CaMV 35S and nos promoters in pollen: implications for field release of transgenic plants. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 265-275 (1997).
41. Curie, C. et al. Cis and trans-acting elements involved in the activation of Arabidopsis thaliana A1 gene encoding the translation elongation factor EF-1 alpha. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1305-1310 (1991).
42. Atanassova, R., Chaubet, N., Gigot, C. A 126 bp fragment of a plant histone gene promoter confers preferential expression in meristems of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2, 291-300 (1992).
43. Gao, Y. et al. Auxin binding protein 1 (ABP1) is not required for either auxin signaling or Arabidopsis development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2275-2280 (2015).
44. Merlot, S. et al. Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. Plant J. 30, 601-609 (2012).
45. Haruta, M. et al. Molecular characterization of mutant Arabidopsis plants with reduced plasma membrane proton pump activity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 17918-17929 (2010).
46. Kinoshita, T. et al. Phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. Nature 414, 656660 (2001)
47. Wang, Z. P. et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 16, 144 (2015).
48. Hyun, Y. et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta 241, 271-284 (2015).
49. Yan, L. et al. High-Efficiency Genome Editing in Arabidopsis Using YAO Promoter-Driven CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol. Plant 8, 1820-1823 (2015).
50. Mao, Y. et al. Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotech. J. 14, 519-532 (2016).
51. Duby, G., Boutry, M. The plant plasma membrane proton pump ATPase: a highly regulated P-type ATPase with multiple physiological roles. Pflugers Arch. 457, 645-655 (2009).
52. Osakabe, Y. et al. Overproduction of the membrane-bound receptor-like protein kinase 1, RPK1, enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9190-9201 (2010).
53. Osakabe, Y. et al. Osmotic stress responses and plant growth controlled by potassium transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 25, 609-624 (2013).
54. Nagaya, S., Kawamura, K., Shinmyo, A., Kato, K. The HSP terminator of Arabidopsis thaliana increases gene expression in plant cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 328-332 (2010).
55. Thorvaldsdottir, H., Robinson, J. T., Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178-192 (2013).
56. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24-26 (2011).