Relationship between glycemic response of starch and its microstructural state;Relación entre la respuesta glicémica del almidón y su estado microestructural

Revista Chilena de Nutricion

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Parada S, Javier Alejandro ^a   Rozowski N, Jaime ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Digestibility; Glycemic response; Microstructure; Starch

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981745530     PISSN: 07177518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0717-75182008000200001     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Thomas MS. Wolever DM. Carbohydrate and the regulation of blood glucosa and metabolism, Nutr Rev 2003; 61:40-48.
2. Berti C. Riso P. Monti LD. Porrini M. In vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glucose response of gluten-free foods and their gluten counterparts, Eur J Nutr 2004; 43:198-204.
3. Aguilera JM. Why food microstructure?, J Food Eng 2005; 67:3-11.
4. Browman BA. Russell RM. Conocimientos actuales sobre nutrición (8a.ed., pp.64-77). Organización panamericana de la salud, Washington DC, 2001.
5. Foster-Powell K. Holt SH. Brand-Miller JC. Internacional table of glycemic index and glycemic load values, Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76:5-56.
6. Granfeldt Y. Wu X. Björck I. Determination of glycaemic index; some methodological aspects related to the analysis of carbohydrate load and characteristics of the previous evening meal, Eur J Clin Nutr 2006; 60:104-112.
7. Giacco R. Brighenti F. Parillo M. Capuano M. Ciardullo AV. Rivieccio A. Rivellese AA. Riccardi G. Characteristics of some wheat-based foods of the Italian diet in relation to their influence on postprandial glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes, Brit J Nutr 2001; 85:33-40.
8. Rendón-Villalobos R., Agama-Acevedo E., Islas-Hernández JJ. In vitro starch bioavailability or corn tortillas with hydrocolloids, Food Chem 2006; 97:631-636.
9. Hu P. Zhao H. Dual Z. Linlin Z. We D. Starch digestibility and the estimated glycemic score of different types of rice differing in amylase contents, J Cereal Sci 2004; 40:231-237.
10. Chung H. Lim HS. Lim S. Effect of partial gelatinization and retrogradation on the enzymatic digestion of waxy rice starch, J Cereal Sci 2006; 43:353-359.
11. Englyst HN. Kingman SM. Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions, Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46:S33-S50.
12. Gregory JF. Quinlivan EP. Davis SR. Integrated the issues of folate bioavailability, intake and metabolism in the era of fortification, Trends Food Sci Tech 2005; 16:229-240
13. Araya H. Contreras P. Alviña M. Vera G. Pak N. A comparison between an in vitro method to determine carbohydrate digestion rate and the glycemic response in young men, Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56:735-739.
14. Seal CJ. Daly ME. Thomas LC. Bal W. Birkett AM. Jeffcoat R. Mathers JC. Postprand ial carbohydrate metabolism in healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes fed starches with slow and rapid hydrolysis rates determined in vitro, Brit J Nutr 2003; 90:853-864.
15. Goñi I. Garcia-Alonso A. Saura-Calixto F. A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index, Nutr Res 1997; 17:427-437.
16. Sajilata MG. Singhal RS. Kulkarni PR. Resistant starch-a review, Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2006; 5:1-17.
17. Dussaillant M. Estudio de transiciones de fase del almidón de papa por microscopía. Memoria para optar al grado de Ingeniero Civil de Industrias con mención en Química de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2000.
18. Shin SI. Kim HJ. Ha HJ. Lee SH. Moon TW. Effect of hydrothermal treatment on formation and structural characteristics of slowly digestible non-pasted granular sweet potato starch, Starch/Stärke 2005; 57:421-430.
19. Fardet A. Hoebler C. Baldwin PM. Bouchet B. Gallant DJ. Barry JL. Involvement of the protein network in the in vitro degradation of starch from spaghetti and lasagna: a microscopic and enzymic study, J Cereal Sci 1998; 27:133-145.
20. Farhat IA. Blanshard JM. Mitchell JR. The retrogradation of waxy maize starch extrudates: effects of storage temperature and water content, Biopolymers 2000; 53:411-422.
21. Srikaeo K. Furst JE. Ashton JF. Hosken RW. Microestructural changes of starch in cooked weat grains as affected by cooking temperaturas and times, Food Sci Technol-Leb 2006; 39:528-533.
22. Goñi I. Valdivieso L. Garcia-Alonso A. Nori seaweed consumption modifies glyc emic response in healthy volunteers, Nutr Res 2000; 20:1367-1375.
23. Heacock PM. Hertzler SR. Wolf B. The glycemic, insulinemic, and breath hydrogen responses in humans to a food starch esterified by 1-octenyl succinic anhydride, Nutr Res 2004; 24:581-592.
24. Osorio-Díaz P. Bello-Pérez LA. Sáyago-Ayerdi SG. Benítez-Reyes M. Tovar J. Paredes-López O. Effect of processing and storage time on in vitro digestibility and resistant starch content of two bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) varieties, J Sci Food Agr 2003; 83:1283-1288.
25. Han X. Ao Z. Janaswamy S. Jane J. Chandrasekaran R. Hamaker BR. Development of a low glycemic maize starch: preparation and characterization, Biomacromolecules 2006; 7:1162-1168
26. Juntunen KS. Laaksonen DE. Autio K. Niskanen LK. Holst JJ. Savolainen KE. Liukkonen K. Poutanen KS. Mykkänen HM. Structural differences between rye and wheat breads but not total fiber content may explain the lower postprandial insulin response to rye bread, Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78:957-964.
27. Riccardi G. Clemente G. Giacco R. Glycemic index of local foods and diets: the mediterranean experience, Nutr Rev2003; 61:56-60.
28. http://www.fao.org/es/ess/faostat/foodsecurity/Files/DietNutrients.xls, 01 de agosto de 2007.
29. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W8079E/w8079e00.htm#Contents, 01 de agosto de 2007.