Structural differences between rye and wheat breads but not total fiber content may explain the lower postprandial insulin response to rye bread

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 957-964

  Juntunen, Katri S ^a   Laaksonen, David E ^b   Autio, Karin ^c   Niskanen, Leo K ^b   Holst, Jens J ^d   Savolainen, Kari E ^b   Liukkonen, Kirsi Helena ^c   Poutanen, Kaisa S ^c   Mykkänen, Hannu M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Blood glucose; C peptide; Cereal fiber; Glucagon like peptide 1; Glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; Insulin; Postmenopausal women; Postprandial; Rye; Wheat

Indexed keywords

C PEPTIDE; CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCAGON LIKE PEPTIDE 1; GLUCOSE; INSULIN; POLYPEPTIDE; STARCH; GASTRIC INHIBITORY POLYPEPTIDE; GLUCAGON; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PROTEIN PRECURSOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; BODY MASS; BREAD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSPERM; FEMALE; FIBER; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; HIGH FIBER DIET; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; INSULIN BLOOD LEVEL; INSULIN LIKE ACTIVITY; INSULIN RESPONSE; MEAL; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTMENOPAUSE; POSTPRANDIAL STATE; RYE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; WHEAT; BLOOD; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIETARY FIBER; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

SECALE CEREALE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BREAD; C-PEPTIDE; DIETARY FIBER; FEMALE; GASTRIC INHIBITORY POLYPEPTIDE; GLUCAGON; GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE 1; HUMANS; HYDROLYSIS; INSULIN; KINETICS; MICROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN PRECURSORS; SECALE CEREALE; STARCH; TRITICUM;

EID: 0642341496     PISSN: 00029165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/78.5.957     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Zammit VA, Waterman IJ, Topping D, McKay G. Insulin stimulation of hepatic triacylglycerol secretion and the etiology of insulin resistance. J Nutr 2001;131:2074-7.
2. Hu FB, van Dam RM, Liu S. Diet and risk of type II diabetes: the role of types of tat and carbohydrate. Diabetologia 2001,44:805-17.
3. Leinonen K, Liukkonen K, Poutanen K, Uusitupa M, Mykkánen H. Rye bread decreases postprandial insulin response but does not alter glucose response in healthy Finnish subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999,53:262-7.
4. Juntunen KS, Niskanen LK, Liukkonen KH, Poutanen KS, Holst JJ, Mykkänen HM. Postprandial glucose, insulin, and incretin responses to grain products in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:254-62.
5. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker HM, Fielden H, Gassull MA. Lack of effect of refining on the glycemic response to cereals. Diabetes Care 1981;4.509-13
6. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Jenkins AL, et al Low glycemic response to traditionally processed wheat and rye products: bulgur and pumper-nickel bread. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;43:516-20.
7. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Jenkins AL, Lee R, Wong GS, Josse R. Glycemic response to wheat products: reduced response to pasta but no effect of fiber. Diabetes Care 1983;6:155-9.
8. Hagander B, Björck I, Asp NG, et al. Hormonal and metabolic responses to breakfast meals in NIDDM: comparison of white and whole-grain wheat bread and corresponding extruded products Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 1985;39:114-23
9. Heinonen L, Korpela R, Mantere S. The effect of different types of Finnish bread on postprandial glucose response in diabetic patients. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 1985;39:108-13.
10. Heaton KW, Marcus SN, Emmett PM, Bolton CH. Particle size of wheat, maize, and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;47:675-82.
11. Englyst HN, Cummings JH. Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:778-87.
12. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998;15:539-53.
13. Asp NG, Johansson CG, Hallmer H, Siljeström M. Rapid enzymatic assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. J Agric Food Chem 1983;31:476-82.
14. Granfeldt Y, Bjorck I, Drews A, Tovar J. An in vitro procedure based on chewing to predict metabolic response to starch in cereal and legume products. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:649-60.
15. Bernfeld P. Amylases alpha and beta. In: Kaplan NO, ed. Methods in enzymology. New York: Academic Press, 1955:149-58.
16. Autio K, Härkönen H, Parkkonen T, Poutanen K, Siika-aho M. Effects of purified endo-beta-xylanase and endo-beta-glucanase on the structural and baking characteristics of rye doughs. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technol 1996;29:18-27.
17. Krarup T, Madsbad S, Moody AJ, et al. Diminished immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide response to a meal in newly diagnosed type I (insulin-dependent) diabetics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983;56:1306-12.
18. Orskov C, Rabenhoj L, Wettergren A, Kofod H, Holst JJ. Tissue and plasma concentrations of amidated and glycine-extended glucagon-like peptide I in humans. Diabetes 1994;43:535-9.
19. Ha M-A, Mann JT, Melton LD, Lewis-Barned NJ. Calculation of the glycaemic index. Diab Nutr Metab 1992;5:137-9.
20. SPSS Inc. SPSS base 8.0. User's guide Chicago: SPSS Inc. 1998.
21. Ludwig DS. The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 2002;287:2414-23.
22. Ellis PR, Roberts FG, Low AG, Morgan LM. The effect of high-molecular-weight guar gum on net apparent glucose absorption and net apparent insulin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide production in the growing pig: relationship to rheological changes in jejunal digesta. Br J Nutr 1995;74:539-56.
23. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Leeds AR, et al. Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity. Br Med J 1978;1:1392-4.
24. Munoz JM, Sandstead HH, Jacob RA. Effects of dietary fiber on glucose tolerance of normal men Diabetes 1979;28:496-502.
25. Härkönen H, Pessa E, Suortti T, Poutanen K. Distribution and some properties of cell wall polysaccharides in rye milling fractions. J Cereal Sci 1997;26:95-104.
26. Åman P, Nilsson M, Andersson R. Positive health effects of rye. Cereal Foods World 1997;42:684-8.
27. Lu ZX, Walker KZ, Muir JG, Mascara T, O'Dea K. Arabinoxylan fiber, a byproduct of wheat flour processing, reduces the postprandial glucose response in normoglycemic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:1123-8.
28. Liljeberg HG, Granfeldt YE, Björck IM. Products based on a high fiber barley genotype, but not on common barley or oats, lower postprandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy humans. J Nutr 1996,126.458-66.
29. Collier G, O'Dea K The effect of congestion of fat on the glucose, insulin, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses to carbohydrate and protein Am J Clin Nutr 1983;37:941-4
30. Spiller GA, Jensen CD, Pattison TS, Chuck CS, Whittam JH, Scala J. Effect of protein dose on serum glucose and insulin response to sugars. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;46:474-80.
31. Wolever TM, Bolognesi C. Prediction of glucose and insulin responses of normal subjects after consuming mixed meals varying in energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate and glycemic index. J Nutr 1996;126:2807-12.
32. Holst JJ. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide analogues: do they have a therapeutic role in diabetes mellitus similar to that of glucagon-like peptide-1?BioDrugs 2002;16:175-81.
33. Juntunen KS, Laaksonen DE, Poutanen KS, Niskanen LK, Mykkänen HM. High-fiber rye bread and insulin secretion and sensitivity in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:385-91.
34. Morgan LM, Tredger JA, Shavila Y, Travis JS, Wright J. The effect of non-starch polysaccharide supplementation on circulating bile acids, hormone and metabolite levels following a fat meal in human subjects. Br J Nutr 1993;70:491-501.
35. Morgan LM, Tredger JA, Wright J, Marks V. The effect of soluble-and insoluble-fibre supplementation on post-prandial glucose tolerance, insulin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide secretion in healthy subjects. Br J Nutr 1990;64:103-10.
36. Morgan LM, Goulder TJ, Tsiolakis D, Marks V, Alberti KG. The effect of unabsorbable carbohydrate on gut hormones. Modification of post-prandial GIP secretion by guar. Diabetologia 1979;17:85-9.
37. Gatenby SJ, Ellis PR, Morgan LM, Judd PA. Effect of partially depolymerized guar gum on acute metabolic variables in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabet Med 1996;13:358-64.
38. Levitt NS, Vinik AI, Sive AA, Child PT, Jackson WP. The effect of dietary fiber on glucose and hormone responses to a mixed meal in normal subjects and in diabetic subjects with and without autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1980;3:515-9.
39. Nunes CS, Malmlof K. Effects of guar gum and cellulose on glucose absorption, hormonal release and hepatic metabolism in the pig. Br J Nutr 1992;68:693-700.
40. Autio K, Liukkonen K-H, Juntunen K, et al. Food structure and its relation to starch digestibility and glycaemic response. In: Fischer P, Marti I, Windhab EJ, eds. 3rd International Conference of Food Rheology and Structure, Zurich, Switzerland, 2003. Lappersdorf, Germany: Kerschensteiner Verlag GmbH, 2003:7-11.
41. Brand JC, Foster KAF, Crossman S, Truswell AS. The glycaemic and insulin indices of realistic meals and rye breads tested in healthy subjects. Diab Nutr Metab 1990;3:137-42.
42. Liljeberg H, Björck I. Bioavailability of starch in bread products. Postprandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects and in vitro resistant starch content. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48:151-63.
43. Slaughter SL, Ellis PR, Butterworth PJ. An investigation of the action of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase on native and gelatinised starches. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1525:29-36.