Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Coley, John D ^a   Tanner, Kimberly ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; COGNITION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; STUDENT; THINKING; UNIVERSITY;

BIOLOGY; COGNITION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; STUDENTS; THINKING; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84981709221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Ahn W, Kalish C, Gelman SA, Medin DL, Luhmann C, Atran S, Coley JD, Shafto P (2001). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition 82, 59–69.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
3. AAAS (2014a). Project 2061: Evolution and Natural Selection. http://assessment.aaas.org/topics/EN#/,tabs-265/2,tabs-264/2,tabs-262/2 (accessed 20 May 2014).
4. AAAS (2014b). Project 2061: Interdependence in Ecosystems. http://assessment.aaas.org/topics/IE#/,tabs-173/2,tabs-176/2 (accessed 20 May 2014).
5. Anderson CW, Sheldon TH, DuBay J (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. J Res Sci Teach 27, 761–776.
6. Anderson DL, Fisher KM, Norman GJ (2002). Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. J Res Sci Teach 39, 952–978.
7. Arnaudin MW, Mintzes JJ (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: a cross-age study. Sci Educ 69, 721–733.
8. Atran S, Medin DL (2008). The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
9. Berlin B (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bishop BA, Anderson CW (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach 27, 415–427.
11. Braaten M, Windschitl M (2011). Working toward a stronger concep­tualization of scientific explanation for science education. Sci Educ 95, 639–669.
12. Carey S (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Coley JD (2000). On the importance of comparative research: the case of folkbiology. Child Dev 71, 82–90.
14. Coley JD (2007). The human animal: developmental changes in judgments of taxonomic and psychological similarity among humans and other animals. Cogn Brain Behav 11, 733–756.
15. Coley JD, Muratore TM (2012). Trees, fish, and other fictions: folk bio­logical thought and its implications for understanding evolutionary biology. In: Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution, ed. KS Rosengren, S Brem, EM Evans, and G Sinatra, New York: Oxford University Press, 22–46.
16. Coley JD, Solomon GEA, Shafto P (2002). The development of folkbiology: a cognitive science perspective on children’s understanding of the biological world. In: Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations, ed. P Kahn and S Kellert, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 65–91.
17. Coley JD, Tanner KD (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: cognitive principles and the development of biological thinking. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 1–7.
18. D’Avanzo C (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: ecological examples. BioScience 53, 1121–1128.
19. diSessa A (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In: Constructivism in the Computer Age, ed. G Forman and PB Pufall, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 49–70.
20. diSessa A (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cogn Instr 10, 105–225.
21. Eidson RC, Coley JD (2014). Not so fast: gender essentialism in young adults. J Cogn Dev 15, 382–292.
22. Evans EM (2008).Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: a developmental analysis. In: International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, ed. S Vosniadou, New York: Routledge, 263–294.
23. Evans EM, Rosengren K, Lane JD, Price KS (2012). Encountering counterintuitive ideas: constructing a developmental learning progression for biological evolution. In: Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolu­tion, ed. KS Rosengren, S Brem, EM Evans, and G Sinatra, New York: Oxford University Press, 174–199.
24. Friedler Y, Zohar A, Tamir P (1993). The effect of age and of learning on the ability to distinguish between anthropomorphic and teleological explanations. Int J Sci Educ 15, 439–443.
25. Gelman SA (2003). The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought, New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Gelman SA, Rhodes M (2012). “Two-thousand years of stasis”: how psychological essentialism impedes evolutionary understanding. In: Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution, ed. KS Rosengren, S Brem, EM Evans, and G Sinatra, New York: Oxford University Press, 3–21.
27. Gelman SA, Wellman HM (1991). Insides and essences: early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 38, 213–244.
28. Gentner D, Smith LA (2013). Analogical learning and reasoning. In: The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, ed. D Reisberg, New York: Oxford University Press, 668–681.
29. Gopnik A (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal understanding: the evolution, function and phenomenology of the theory-formation system. In: Cognition and Explanation, ed. F Keil and R Wilson, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 299–323.
30. Greene E (1990). The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach 27, 875–885.
31. Grotzer TA (2003). Learning to understand the forms of causality implicit in scientifically accepted explanations. Stud Sci Educ 39, 11–74.
32. Gunckel KL, Covitt BA, Salinas I, Anderson CW (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. J Res Sci Teach 49, 843–868.
33. Hackling MW, Treagust D (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. J Res Sci Teach 21, 197–209.
34. Hartley LM, Wilke BJ, Schramm JW, D’Avanzo C, Anderson CW (2011). College students’ understanding of the carbon cycle: contrasting principle-based and informal reasoning. BioScience 61, 65–75.
35. Hull DL (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: two thousand years of stasis. Br J Philos Sci 15, 314–326.
36. Inagaki K, Hatano G (1991). Constrained person analogy in young children's biological inference. Cogn Dev 6, 219–231.
37. Inagaki K, Hatano G (2002). Young Children’s Naive Thinking about the Biological World, New York: Psychology Press.
38. Inagaki K, Hatano G (2006). Young children's conception of the bio­logical world. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15, 4177–181.
39. Kahneman D (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
40. Keil FC (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Keil FC (2006). Explanations and understanding. Annu Rev Psychol 57, 227–254.
42. Kelemen D (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition 70, 241–272.
43. Kelemen D (2012). Teleological minds: how natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In: Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution, ed. KS Rosengren, SK Brem, EM Evans, and GM Sinatra, New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Kelemen D, Rossett E (2009). The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition 111, 138–143.
45. Kelemen D, Rottman J, Seston R (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies. Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. J Exp Psychol: General 142, 1074–1083.
46. Knight JK, Wood WB (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol 4, 298–310.
47. Köse S (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: using drawings as a research method. World Appl Sci J 3, 283–293.
48. Kuech R, Zogg G, Zeeman S, Johnson M (2003). Technology rich biology labs: effects of misconceptions. Paper presented at the National Association from Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual Conference, held 22–26 March 2003 in Philadelphia, PA.
49. Leach J, Driver R, Scott P, Wood-Robinson C (1992). Progression in Understanding of Ecology Concepts by Pupils Aged 5 to 16, Leeds, UK: Children’s Learning in Science Research Group, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
50. Legare CH, Lane J, Evans EM (2013). Anthropomorphizing science: how does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts? Merrill-Palmer Q 59, 168–197.
51. Leonard MJ, Kalinowski ST, Andrews TC (2014). Misconceptions yesterday, today and tomorrow. CBE Life Sci Educ 13, 179–186.
52. Marbach-Ad G, Briken V, El-Sayed NM, Frauwirth K, Fredericksen B, Hutcheson S, Gao L-Y, Joseph SW, Lee V, McIver KS, et al. (2009). Assessing student understanding of host pathogen interactions using a concept inventory. J Microbiol Educ 10, 43–50.
53. Maskiewicz AC, Lineback JE (2013). Misconceptions are “so yesterday!” CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 352–356.
54. Mayr E (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance, London: Belknap.
55. Medin DL, Ortony A (1989). Psychological essentialism. In: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, ed. S Vosniadou and A Ortony, Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press, 179–195.
56. Miller JL, Bartsch K (1997). The development of biological explanation: are children vitalists? Dev Psychol 33, 156–164.
57. Mohan L, Chen J, Anderson CW (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. J Res Sci Teach 46, 675–698.
58. Morris SC, Taplin JE, Gelman SA (2000). Vitalism in naive biological thinking. Dev Psychol 36, 582–595.
59. Murphy GL (2002). The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Nehm RH, Ridgway J (2011). What do experts and novices “see” in evolutionary problems? Evo Educ Outreach 4, 666–679.
61. Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? J Sci Teach Educ 18, 699–723.
62. Özay E, Oztas H (2003). Secondary students’ interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. J Biol Educ 37, 68–70.
63. Passmore C, Stewart J (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. J Res Sci Teach 39, 185–204.
64. Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66, 211–227.
65. Rips LJ (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, ed. S Vosniadou and A Ortony, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 21–59.
66. Sadler P, Sonnert G, Coyle H, Cook-Smith N, Miller J (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. Am Educ Res J 50, 1020–1049.
67. Shi J, Martin JM, Guild NA, Vincens Q, Knight JK (2010). A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 453–461.
68. Shtulman A (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cogn Psychol 52, 170–194.
69. Shtulman A, Calabi P (2012). Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. In: Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution, ed. KS Rosengren, S Brem, EM Evans, and G Sinatra, New York: Oxford University Press, 47–65.
70. Shtulman A, Schulz L (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cogn Sci 32, 1049–1062.
71. Shtulman A, Valcarcel J (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition 124, 209–215.
72. Sloman SA (2005). Causal Models: How We Think about the World and Its Alternatives, New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Smith MK, Wood WB, Knight JK (2008). The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understand­ing of genetics. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 422–430.
74. Solomon G, Johnson SC, Zaitchik D, Carey S (1996). Like father like son: young children’s understanding of how and why offspring resemble their parents. Child Dev 67, 151–171.
75. Songer CJ, Mintzes JJ (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology. J Res Sci Teach 31, 621–637.
76. Stavy R, Eisen Y, Yaakobi D (1987). How students aged 13–15 understand photosynthesis. Int J Sci Educ 9, 105–115.
77. Stern L, Roseman JE (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life Science. J Res Sci Teach 41, 538–568.
78. Taber KS, Garcia-Franco A (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about particulate structure of matter. J Learn Sci 19, 99–142.
79. Talanquer V (2006). Commonsense chemistry: a model for understanding students’ alternative conceptions. J Chem Educ 83, 811–816.
80. Talanquer V (2007). Explanations and teleology in chemistry education. Int J Sci Educ 29, 853–870.
81. Talanquer V (2010). Exploring dominant types of explanations built by general chemistry students. Int J Sci Educ 32, 2393–2412.
82. Talanquer V (2013). When atoms want. J Chem Educ 90, 1419–1424.
83. Tamir P (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. J Biol Educ 23, 285–292.
84. Tamir P, Zohar A (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Sci Educ 75, 57–67.
85. Vosniadou S (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learn Instr 4, 45–69.
86. Vosniadou S (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In: Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, ed. M Limón and L Mason, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 61–76.
87. Wandersee JH (1986). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students’ misconceptions? J Res Sci Teach 23, 581–597.
88. Wandersee JH, Mintzes JJ, Novak JD (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In: Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, ed. D Gabel, New York: Macmillan, 177–210.
89. Westbrook S, Marek E (1992). A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of homeostasis. J Res Sci Teach 29, 51–61.
90. Zohar A, Ginossar S (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions. Sci Educ 82, 679–697.