Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1325-1340

  Andrews, Glenda ^a   Birney, Damian ^b   Halford, Graeme S ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 33845971507     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193275     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. ANDREWS, G., & HALFORD, G. S. (1998). Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity. Cognitive Development, 13, 479-513.
2. ANDREWS, G., & HALFORD, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153-219.
3. ANDREWS, G., HALFORD, G. S., BUNCH, K. M., BOWDEN, D., & JONES, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74, 1476-1499.
4. ANDREWS, G., HALFORD, G. S., & PRASAD, A. (1998). Processing load and children's comprehension of relative clause sentences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420091).
5. BADDELEY, A. [D.] (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
6. BADDELEY, A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention? In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 152-170). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
7. BIRNEY, D. P. (2002). The measurement of task complexity and cognitive ability: Relational complexity in adult reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane.
8. BIRNEY, D. P., & HALFORD, G. S. (2000, August). Methods for analysing complexity in reasoning tasks: Links to fluid intelligence. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Thinking, University of Durham.
9. BIRNEY, D. P., & HALFORD, G. S. (2001). Understanding cognitive complexity: Evidence from cognitive psychology and individual differences. Paper presented at the Third International Spearman Seminar, University of Sydney, Australia.
10. BIRNEY, D. P., & HALFORD, G. S. (2002). Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 109-134.
11. BIRNEY, D. P., HALFORD, G. S., & ANDREWS, G. (2006). Measuring the influence of complexity on relational reasoning: The development of the Latin Square Task. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 66, 146-171.
12. BLAUBERGS, M. S., & BRAINE, M. D. S. (1974). Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 745-748.
13. BLUMENTHAL, A. L. (1966). Observations with self-embedded sentences. Psychonomic Science, 6, 453-454.
14. BOAG, C. C., HÄRTEL, C. E. J., & HALFORD, G. S. (in press). An integrated model of situation awareness and decision making in air traffic control to explain performance errors. Proceedings of the European Association for Aviation Psychology Conference. Crieff, Scotland.
15. CAPLAN, D., ALPERT, N., & WATERS, G. [S.] (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 541-552.
16. CAPLAN, D., ALPERT, N., & WATERS, G. [S.] (1999). PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation. NeuroImage, 9, 343-351.
17. CAPLAN, D., & WATERS, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 77-126.
18. CARPENTER, P. A., MIYAKE, A., & JUST, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075-1122). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. CHALMERS, K. A., & HALFORD, G. S. (2003). Young children's understanding of oddity: Reducing complexity by simple oddity and "most different" strategies. Cognitive Development, 18, 1-23.
20. CHRISTOFF, K., PRABHAKARAN, V., DORFMAN, J., ZHAO, Z., KROGER, J. K., HOLYOAK, K. J., & GABRIELI, J. D. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136-1149.
21. CONSTABLE, R. T., PUGH, K. R., BERROYA, E., MENCL, W. E., WESTERVELD, M., NI, W., & SHANKWEILER, D. (2004). Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 22, 11-21.
22. DANEMAN, M., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
23. DANEMAN, M., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422-433.
24. ENGLISH, L. D., & HALFORD, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. FODOR, J. A., & GARRETT, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 289-296.
26. FORD, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 203-218.
27. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (1999). DMDX Display System: Laboratory software for mental chronometry [Computer software]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. Available at www.u.arizona.edu/ ~kforster/dmastr/dmastr.htm.
28. FRAZIER, L. (1985). Syntactic complexity. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. GIBSON, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
30. GIBSON, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project Symposium (pp. 94-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. GORDON, P. C., HENDRICK, R., & LEVINE, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425-430.
32. HAARMANN, H. J., JUST, M. A., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain & Language, 59, 76-120.
33. HALFORD, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. HALFORD, G. S., ANDREWS, G., DALTON, C., BOAG, C., & ZIELINSKI, T. (2002). Young children's performance on the balance scale: The influence of relational complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 417-445.
35. HALFORD, G. S., ANDREWS, G., & JENSEN, I. (2002). Integration of category induction and hierarchical classification: One paradigm at two levels of complexity. Journal of Cognition & Development, 3,143-177.
36. HALFORD, G. S., BAKER, R., MCCREDDEN, J. E., & BAIN, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70-76.
37. HALFORD, G. S., MAYBERY, M. T., & BAIN, J. D. (1986). Capacity limitations in children's reasoning: A dual-task approach. Child Development, 57, 616-627.
38. HALFORD, G. S., MAYBERY, M. T., O'HARE, A. W., & GRANT, P. (1994). The development of memory and processing capacity. Child Development' 16, 1338-1356.
39. HALFORD, G. S., PHILLIPS, S., & WILSON, W. H. (2001). Processing capacity limits are not explained by storage limits. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 123-124.
40. HALFORD, G. S., WILSON, W. H., & PHILLIPS, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 803-864.
41. JUST, M. A., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
42. JUST, M. A., CARPENTER, P. A., KELLER, T. A., EDDY, W. F., & THULBORN, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114-116.
43. KING, J., & JUST, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 580-602.
44. KLAPP, S. T., MARSHBURN, E. A., & LESTER, P. T. (1983). Short-term memory does not involve the "working memory" of information processing: The demise of a common assumption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 240-264.
45. KROGER, J. K., SABB, F. W., FALES, C. L., BOOKHEIMER, S. Y., COHEN, M. S., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (2002). Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: A parametric study of relational complexity. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 477-485.
46. LARKIN, W., & BURNS, D. (1977). Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure. Memory & Cognition, 5, 17-22.
47. LEWIS, R. (1996). A theory of grammatical but unacceptable embeddings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93-116.
48. LINEBARGER, M. C., SCHWARTZ, M. F., & SAFFRAN, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity o grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasies. Cognition, 13, 361-392.
49. MARKS, L. E. (1968). Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7,965-967.
50. MARTIN, R. C., & ROMANI, C. (1994). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view. Neuropsychology, 8, 506-523.
51. MAYBERY, M. T., BAIN, J. D., & HALFORD, G. S. (1986). Information-processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 600-613.
52. MILLER, G. A., & ISARD, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information & Control, 7, 292-303.
53. MURPHY, K. M., & ANDREWS, G. (2006). Test-retest reliability of short-term memory and working memory measures. Manuscript in preparation.
54. NI, W., & SHANKWEILER, D. (1995, January). Difficulties in on-line processing of relative clause sentences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans.
55. NUNNALLY, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
56. PHILLIPS, S., & NIKI, K. (2003). Increased bilateral occipitoparietal activity during retention of binary versus unary indexed lists in pair recognition. NeuroImage, 20, 1226-1235.
57. POLK, T. A., & NEWELL, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533-566.
58. ROCHON, E., WATERS, G. S., & CAPLAN, D. (2000). The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 43, 395-413.
59. SHELDON, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 272-281.
60. STROMSWOLD, K., CAPLAN, D., ALPERT, N., & RAUCH, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain & Language, 52, 452-473.
61. STUSS, D. T., & LEVINE, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 401-433.
62. TRABASSO, T. (1975). Representation, memory and reasoning: How do we make transitive inferences? In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 135-172). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63. TRAXLER, M. J., MORRIS, R. K., & SEELY, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 69-90.
64. TRAXLER, M. J., WILLIAMS, R. S., BLOZIS, S. A., & MORRIS, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 204-224.
65. TURNER, M. L., & ENGLE, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 127-154.
66. WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAK, K. J., BOONE, K. B., MISHKIN, F. S., DE MENEZES SANTOS, M., ET AL. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119-125.
67. WATERS, G. S., & CAPLAN, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and online syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology & Aging, 16, 128-144.
68. WATERS, G. [S.], & CAPLAN, D. (2002). Working memory and online syntactic processing in Alzheimer's disease: Studies with auditory moving window presentation. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 57B, P298-P311.
69. WATERS, G. S., & CAPLAN, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550-564.
70. WATERS, G. S., & CAPLAN, D. (2004). Verbal working memory and online syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 129-163.
71. WATERS, G. [S.], CAPLAN, D., ALPERT, N., & STANCZAK, L. (2003). Individual differences in rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: Effects of working memory and speed of processing. NeuroImage, 19, 101-112.
72. ZIELINSKI, T. A., GOODWIN, G., & HALFORD, G. S. (2006). Relational complexity and logic: Categorical syllogisms revisited. Manuscript submitted for publication.