Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions—a clinical comparative study

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 579-587

  Rödiger, Matthias ^a   Heinitz, Arthur ^a   Bürgers, Ralf ^a   Rinke, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cad Cam; Digital impression; Fitting accuracy; Replica technique; Zirconia crown

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; GERMANY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; GERMANY; HUMANS; MOLAR; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84980030902     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont. doi:10.1111/jopr.12410 [Epub ahead of print]
2. Reich S, Vollborn T, Mehl A, Zimmermann M (2013) Intraoral optical impression system: an overview. Int J Comput Dent 16:143–162
3. Ting-Shu S, Jian S (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24:313–321
4. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S (2015) Intraoral scanning systems—a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 18:101–129
5. Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO (2013) An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 110(5):420–423
6. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 14:10–17
7. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR (1990) Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 64:636–642
8. Karlsson S (1993) The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:129–134
9. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O (2013) Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110:447–454
10. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O (2014) A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 41:853–874
11. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116(3):272–279
12. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764
13. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo É, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth J (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523
14. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30(4):400–407
15. Tidehag P, Ottosson K, Sjögren G (2014) Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 39(3):308–316
16. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D (2015) Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):554–559
17. Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Güth F (2015) Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5 [Epub ahead of print]
18. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559
19. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow--the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17(9):2119–2125
20. Tamim H, Skjerven H, Ekfeldt A, Rønold HJ (2014) Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. Int J Prosthodont 27(4):331–337
21. Selz CF, Bogler J, Vach K, Strub JR, Guess PC (2015) Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 43(12):1428–1435
22. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408
23. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:866–876
24. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122
25. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111
26. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199
27. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U (2011) Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 15:521–526
28. Ahrberg D, Lauer CL, Ahrberg M, Weigl P (2015) Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6 [Epub ahead of print]
29. Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B (2015) Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19:2027–2034
30. Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martínez-Rus F (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43(2):201–208
31. Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5 [Epub ahead of print]
32. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of the scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21
33. Rinke S, Fornefett D, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M (2012) Multifactorial analysis of the impact of different manufacturing processes on the marginal fit of zirconia copings. Dent Mater J 31(4):601–609
34. Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH (2010) Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2:33–38
35. Su TS, Sun J (2015) Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 59:236–242