An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 420-423

  Lee, Sang J ^a   Macarthur IV, Robert X ^b   Gallucci, German O ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTIST; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ALGINATES; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTISTS; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; POLYVINYLS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILOXANES; STUDENTS, DENTAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84887012839     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. W.H. Mormann The evolution of the CEREC system J Am Dent Assoc 137 suppl 2006 7 13
2. N.S. Birnbaum, and H.B. Aaronson Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality Compend Contin Educ Dent 29 2008 494 505
3. G.L. Henkel A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions Compend Contin Educ Dent 28 2007 422 431
4. G.J. Christensen Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling J Am Dent Assoc 140 2009 1301 1304
5. S.J. Lee, and G.O. Gallucci Digital vs conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 24 2013 111 115
6. D. Grauer, and W.R. Proffit Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140 2011 433 443
7. T.J. Marcel Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 2001 666 668
8. N. Patel Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry J Am Dent Assoc 141 suppl 2 2010 20 24
9. G. Priest Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 2005 22 32
10. C.J. Goodacre, A. Garbacea, W.P. Naylor, T. Daher, C.B. Marchack, and J. Lowry CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data J Prosthet Dent 107 2012 34 46
11. T. Miyazaki, Y. Hotta, J. Kunii, S. Kuriyama, and Y. Tamaki A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience Dent Mater J 28 2009 44 56