Integrated analysis of shotgun proteomic data with PatternLab for proteomics 4.0

Nature Protocols

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 102-117

  Carvalho, Paulo C ^a,b   Lima, Diogo B ^a   Leprevost, Felipe V ^a,c   Santos, Marlon D M ^a   Fischer, Juliana S G ^a   Aquino, Priscila F ^d   Moresco, James J ^e   Yates, John R ^e   Barbosa, Valmir C ^f  

^a INSTITUTO CARLOS CHAGAS   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d INSTITUTO LEÔNIDAS E MARIA DEANE   (Brazil)

^e SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GENE ONTOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOTGUN PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TIME FACTOR;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84979862152     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.133     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Hebert, A.S. et al. The one-hour yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 339-347 (2014).
2. Yates, J.R. Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome. J. Mass Spectrom. 33, 1-19 (1998).
3. Zhang, B., Chambers, M.C. & Tabb, D.L. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J. Proteome Res. 6, 3549-3557 (2007).
4. Hwang, S.-I. et al. Systematic characterization of nuclear proteome during apoptosis: A quantitative proteomic study by differential extraction and stable isotope labeling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1131-1145 (2006).
5. Aquino, P.F. et al. Exploring the proteomic landscape of a gastric cancer biopsy with the shotgun imaging analyzer. J. Proteome Res. 13, 314-320 (2014).
6. Calvete, J.J., Sanz, L., Angulo, Y., Lomonte, B. & Gutiérrez, J.M. Venoms, venomics, antivenomics. FEBS Lett. 583, 1736-1743 (2009).
7. Valente, R.H., Dragulev, B., Perales, J., Fox, J.W. & Domont, G.B. BJ46a, a snake venom metalloproteinase inhibitor. Isolation, characterization, cloning and insights into its mechanism of action. Eur. J. Biochem 268, 3042-3052 (2001).
8. Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L. & Yates, J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976-989 (1994).
9. Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R. III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242-247 (2001).
10. Köcher, T., Pichler, P., Swart, R. & Mechtler, K. Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients. Nat. Protoc. 7, 882-890 (2012).
11. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 (2002).
12. Cociorva, D., L Tabb, D. & Yates, J.R. Validation of tandem mass spectrometry database search results using DTASelect. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 16 74, 13.4.1-13.4.14 (2007).
13. Ross, P.L. et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154-1169 (2004).
14. Oda, Y., Huang, K., Cross, F.R., Cowburn, D. & Chait, B.T. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6591-6596 (1999).
15. Carvalho, P.C., Hewel, J., Barbosa, V.C. & Yates, J.R. III. Identifying differences in protein expression levels by spectral counting and feature selection. Genet. Mol. Res. 7, 342-356 (2008).
16. Liu, H., Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R. III. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 4193-4201 (2004).
17. Neilson, K.A. et al. Less label, more free: Approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11, 535-553 (2011).
18. Shevchenko, A., Valcu, C.-M. & Junqueira, M. Tools for exploring the proteomosphere. J. Proteomics 72, 137-144 (2009).
19. Beausoleil, S.A., Villén, J., Gerber, S.A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S.P. A probability-based approach for high-Throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285-1292 (2006).
20. Carvalho, P.C. et al. YADA: A tool for taking the most out of high-resolution spectra. Bioinformatics 25, 2734-2736 (2009).
21. Keller, A., Eng, J., Zhang, N., Li, X. & Aebersold, R. A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1, 2005.0017 (2005).
22. Deutsch, E.W. et al. Trans-Proteomic Pipeline, a standardized data processing pipeline for large-scale reproducible proteomics informatics. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 9, 745-754 (2015).
23. Kohlbacher, O. et al. TOPP-The OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics 23, e191-e197 (2007).
24. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367-1372 (2008).
25. Cox, J. et al. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 4, 698-705 (2009).
26. Carvalho, P.C., Fischer, J.S.G., Chen, E.I., Yates, J.R. & Barbosa, V.C. PatternLab for proteomics: A tool for differential shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 316 (2008).
27. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: An open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966-968 (2010).
28. Giardine, B. et al. Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 15, 1451-1455 (2005).
29. Boekel, J. et al. Multi-omic data analysis using Galaxy. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 137-139 (2015).
30. Egertson, J.D., MacLean, B., Johnson, R., Xuan, Y. & MacCoss, M.J. Multiplexed peptide analysis using data-independent acquisition and Skyline. Nat. Protoc. 10, 887-903 (2015).
31. Carvalho, P.C., Yates, J.R. III. & Barbosa, V.C. Improving the TFold test for differential shotgun proteomics. Bioinformatics 28, 1652-1654 (2012).
32. Leprevost, F.V. et al. Pinpointing differentially expressed domains in complex protein mixtures with the cloud service of PatternLab for Proteomics. J. Proteomics 89, 179-182 (2013).
33. Leprevost, F.V. et al. PepExplorer: A similarity-driven tool for analyzing de novo sequencing results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2480-2489 (2014).
34. Fischer, J. et al. A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA. J. Proteomics 129, 42-50 (2015).
35. Fischer, J. et al. Dynamic proteomic overview of glioblastoma cells (A172) exposed to perillyl alcohol. J. Proteomics 73, 1018-1027 (2010).
36. Carvalho, P.C. et al. GO Explorer: A gene-ontology tool to aid in the interpretation of shotgun proteomics data. Proteome Sci. 7, 6 (2009).
37. Lima, D.B. et al. SIM-XL: A powerful and user-friendly tool for peptide cross-linking analysis. J. Proteomics 129, 51-55 (2015).
38. Borges, D. et al. Using SIM-XL to identify and annotate cross-linked peptides analyzed by mass spectrometry. Protoc. Exch. doi:10.1038/protex.2015.015 (2015).
39. Carvalho, P.C., Yates Iii, J.R. & Barbosa, V.C. Analyzing shotgun proteomic data with PatternLab for proteomics. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 30, 13.13.1-13.13.15 (2010).
40. Carvalho, P.C. et al. Search engine processor: filtering and organizing peptide spectrum matches. Proteomics 12, 944-949 (2012).
41. Carvalho, P.C., Fischer, J.S.G., Xu, T., Yates, J.R. III. & Barbosa, V.C. PatternLab: from mass spectra to label-free differential shotgun proteomics. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 40, 13.19.1-13.19.18 (2012).
42. Eng, J.K., Jahan, T.A. & Hoopmann, M.R. Comet: An open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics 13, 22-24 (2013).
43. Richards, A.L. et al. One-hour proteome analysis in yeast. Nat. Protoc. 10, 701-714 (2015).
44. UniProt Consortium. Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D43-D47 (2013).
45. Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214 (2007).
46. Cottrell, J.S. & Creasy, D.M. Response to: The problem with peptide presumption and low mascot scoring. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5272-5273 (2011).
47. Bandeira, N. Spectral networks: A new approach to de novo discovery of protein sequences and posttranslational modifications. BioTechniques 42 687 (2007).
48. Na, S., Bandeira, N. & Paek, E. Fast multi-blind modification search through tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.010199 (2012).
49. Shevchenko, A. et al. Charting the proteomes of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal. Chem. 73, 1917-1926 (2001).
50. Xu, T. et al. ProLuCID, a fast and sensitive tandem mass spectra-based protein identification program. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, S174 (2006).
51. Borges, D. et al. Effectively addressing complex proteomic search spaces with peptide spectrum matching. Bioinformatics 29, 1343-1344 (2013).
52. Zybailov, B. et al. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 5, 2339-2347 (2006).
53. Thompson, A. et al. Tandem mass tags: A novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895-1904 (2003).
54. McAlister, G.C. et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150-7158 (2014).
55. Picotti, P. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat. Methods 9, 555-566 (2012).
56. Vizcaíno, J.A. et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1063-D1069 (2013).
57. Chambers, M.C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 918-920 (2012).
58. Martens, L. et al. mzML-A community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, R110.000133 (2011).
59. McDonald, W.H. et al. MS1, MS2, and SQT-Three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18, 2162-2168 (2004).
60. Nesvizhskii, A.I. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat. Methods 11, 1114-1125 (2014).
61. de Miguel, N. et al. Proteome analysis of the surface of Trichomonas vaginalis reveals novel proteins and strain-dependent differential expression. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 1554-1566 (2010).
62. Clair, G., Armengaud, J. & Duport, C. Restricting fermentative potential by proteome remodeling: An adaptive strategy evidenced in Bacillus cereus. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.013102 (2012).
63. Webb, K.J., Xu, T., Park, S.K. & Yates, J.R. Modified MuDPIT separation identified 4488 proteins in a system-wide analysis of quiescence in yeast. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2177-2184 (2013).
64. Christie-Oleza, J.A., Piña-Villalonga, J.M., Bosch, R., Nogales, B. & Armengaud, J. Comparative proteogenomics of twelve Roseobacter exoproteomes reveals different adaptive strategies among these marine bacteria. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.013110 (2012).
65. Christie-Oleza, J.A., Fernandez, B., Nogales, B., Bosch, R. & Armengaud, J. Proteomic insights into the lifestyle of an environmentally relevant marine bacterium. ISME J. 6, 124-135 (2012).
66. Chaves, D.F.S. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of the aging soleus and extensor digitorum longus rat muscles using TMT labeling and mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 12, 4532-4546 (2013).
67. Shah, M. et al. Proteomic analysis of the endosperm ontogeny of Jatropha curcas L. seeds. J. Proteome Res. 14, 2557-2568 (2015).