Sex-specific tradeoffs with growth and fitness following life-span extension by rapamycin in an outcrossing nematode, Caenorhabditis remanei

Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 882-890

  Lind, Martin I ^a   Zwoinska, Martyna K ^a   Meurling, Sara ^a   Carlsson, Hanne ^a   Maklakov, Alexei A ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Antiaging; Evolution; Longevity

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT; RAPAMYCIN;

AGING; ANIMAL; CAENORHABDITIS; DRUG EFFECTS; EVOLUTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LONGEVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

AGING; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CAENORHABDITIS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS; LONGEVITY; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SIROLIMUS;

EID: 84979239978     PISSN: 10795006     EISSN: 1758535X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv174     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell. 2006;124:471-484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016
2. Johnson SC, Rabinovitch PS, Kaeberlein M. mTOR is a key modulator of ageing and age-related disease. Nature. 2013;493:338-345. doi: 10.1038/nature11861
3. Broughton SJ, Piper MD, Ikeya T, et al. Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3105-3110.doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405775102
4. Kapahi P, Zid BM, Harper T, Koslover D, Sapin V, Benzer S. Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Curr Biol. 2004;14:885-890. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.059
5. Meissner B, Boll M, Daniel H, Baumeister R. Deletion of the intestinal peptide transporter affects insulin and TOR signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:36739-36745. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403415200
6. Vellai T, Takacs-Vellai K, Zhang Y, Kovacs AL, Orosz L, Müller F. Genetics: Influence of TOR kinase on lifespan in C. elegans. Nature. 2003;426(6967):620. doi: 10.1038/426620a
7. McCulloch D, Gems D. Body size, insulin/IGF signaling and aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:129-136. doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00147-X
8. Holzenberger M, Dupont J, Ducos B, et al. IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature. 2003;421:182-187. doi: 10.1038/nature01298
9. Powers RW 3rd, Kaeberlein M, Caldwell SD, Kennedy BK, Fields S. Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling. Genes Dev. 2006;20:174-184. doi: 10.1101/gad.1381406
10. Robida-Stubbs S, Glover-Cutter K, Lamming DW, et al. TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO. Cell Metab. 2012;15:713-724. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.007
11. Bjedov I, Toivonen JM, Kerr F, et al. Mechanisms of life span extension by rapamycin in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Metab. 2010;11:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010
12. Harrison DE, Strong R, Sharp ZD, et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature. 2009;460:392-395. doi: 10.1038/nature08221
13. Miller RA, Harrison DE, Astle CM, et al. Rapamycin, but not resveratrol or simvastatin, extends life span of genetically heterogeneous mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:191-201. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq178
14. Miller RA, Harrison DE, Astle CM, et al. Rapamycin-mediated lifespan increase in mice is dose and sex dependent and metabolically distinct from dietary restriction. Aging Cell. 2014;13:468-477. doi: 10.1111/acel.12194
15. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. Growth versus lifespan: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:935-940. doi: 10.1016/S0531- 5565(03)00159-1
16. Lee W-S, Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB. Experimental demonstration of the growth rate-lifespan trade-off. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;280(1752):20122370. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2370
17. Rollo CD. Growth negatively impacts the life span of mammals. Evol Dev. 2002;4:55-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.01053.x
18. de Magalhes JP, Costa J, Church GM. An analysis of the relationship between metabolism, developmental schedules, and longevity using phylogenetic independent contrasts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(2):149-160.
19. Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, ed. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton; 1972:136-179.
20. Promislow D. Mate choice, sexual conflict, and evolution of senescence. Behav Genet. 2003;33:191-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1022562103669
21. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol. 2008;22(3):443-453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01417.x
22. Maklakov AA, Lummaa V. Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: causes and constraints. Bioessays. 2013;35:717-724. doi: 10.1002/bies.201300021
23. Charnov EL, Turner TF, Winemiller KO. Reproductive constraints and the evolution of life histories with indeterminate growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9460-9464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161294498
24. Lee WS, Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P, Mangel M. A comparison of dynamicstate- dependent models of the trade-off between growth, damage, and reproduction. Am Nat. 2011;178:774-786. doi: 10.1086/662671
25. Stearns SC. Does impressive progress on understanding mechanisms advance life history theory? In: Flatt T, Heyland A, eds. Mechanisms of Life History Evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011:364-374.
26. Kraus C, Pavard S, Promislow DE. The size-life span trade-off decomposed: why large dogs die young. Am Nat. 2013;181:492-505. doi: 10.1086/669665
27. Criscuolo F, Monaghan P, Nasir L, Metcalfe NB. Early nutrition and phenotypic development: "catch-up" growth leads to elevated metabolic rate in adulthood. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;275(1642):1565-1570. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0148
28. Nussey DH, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG, Blount JD. Life history correlates of oxidative damage in a free-living mammal population. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01555.x
29. Robert KA, Bronikowski AM. Evolution of senescence in nature: physiological evolution in populations of garter snake with divergent life histories. Am Nat. 2010;175:147-159. doi: 10.1086/649595
30. Oldham S, Böhni R, Stocker H, Brogiolo W, Hafen E. Genetic control of size in Drosophila. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000;355:945-952. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0630
31. Colombani J, Raisin S, Pantalacci S, Radimerski T, Montagne J, Léopold P. A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell. 2003;114:739-749. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00713-X
32. Soukas AA, Kane EA, Carr CE, Melo JA, Ruvkun G. Rictor/TORC2 regulates fat metabolism, feeding, growth, and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 2009;23:496-511. doi: 10.1101/gad.1775409
33. LaFever L, Drummond-Barbosa D. Direct control of germline stem cell division and cyst growth by neural insulin in Drosophila. Science. 2005;309:1071-1073. doi: 10.1126/science.1111410
34. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 1986;128(1):137-142. doi: 10.1086/284547
35. Clancy DJ, Gems D, Harshman LG, et al. Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science. 2001;292:104-106. doi: 10.1126/science.1057991
36. Dillin A, Crawford DK, Kenyon C. Timing requirements for insulin/IGF-1 signaling in C. elegans. Science. 2002;298:830-834. doi: 10.1126/science.1074240
37. Arak A. Sexual dimorphism in body size: a model and a test. Evolution 1988;42(4):820. doi: 10.2307/2408874
38. Lehtovaara A, Schielzeth H, Flis I, Friberg U. Heritability of life span is largely sex limited in Drosophila. Am Nat. 2013;182:653-665. doi: 10.1086/673296
39. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994.
40. Fairbairn DJ. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1997;28:659-687.
41. Head G. Selection on fecundity and variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism among spider species (class Araneae). Evolution. 1995;49(4):776-781. doi: 10.2307/2410330
42. Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ. Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity 1999;83(6):697-706. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00616.x
43. Carter CS, Khamiss D, Matheny M, et al. Rapamycin versus intermittent feeding: dissociable effects on physiological and behavioral outcomes when initiated early and late in life. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015:glu238. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu238
44. Gems D, Riddle DL. Genetic, behavioral and environmental determinants of male longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000;154:1597-1610.
45. Stearns SC. The Evolution of Life Histories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992.
46. Chen HY, Maklakov AA. Longer life span evolves under high rates of condition-dependent mortality. Curr Biol. 2012;22:2140-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.021
47. Stiernagle T. Maintenance of C. elegans. In: The C. elegans Research Community, ed. WormBook: The Online Review of C elegans Biology. 2006. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1
48. Lionaki E, Tavernarakis N. Assessing aging and senescent decline in Caenorhabditis elegans: cohort survival analysis. In: Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Kepp O, Kroemer G, eds. Cell Senescence. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2013:473-484.
49. McCulloch D, Gems D. Evolution of male longevity bias in nematodes. Aging Cell. 2003;2:165-173. doi: 10.1046/j.1474-9728.2003.00047.x
50. Brommer JE, Merilä J, Kokko H. Reproductive timing and individual fitness. Ecol Lett. 2002;5(6):802-810.doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00369.x
51. Shi C, Murphy CT. Mating induces shrinking and death in Caenorhabditis mothers. Science. 2014;343:536-540. doi: 10.1126/science.1242958
52. Ivanov DK, Escott-Price V, Ziehm M, et al. Longevity GWAS using the Drosophila genetic reference panel. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015:glv047. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv047
53. Evans DS, Kapahi P, Hsueh WC, Kockel L. TOR signaling never gets old: aging, longevity and TORC1 activity. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10:225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.04.001
54. Lamming DW, Ye L, Katajisto P, et al. Rapamycin-induced insulin resistance is mediated by mTORC2 loss and uncoupled from longevity. Science. 2012;335:1638-1643. doi: 10.1126/science.1215135
55. Eklund J, Bradford GE. Longevity and lifetime body weight in mice selected for rapid growth. Nature 1977;265(5589):48-49. doi: 10.1038/265048b0
56. Olsson M, Shine R. Growth to death in lizards. Evolution. 2002;56:1867-1870. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00202.x
57. Lints FA, Soliman MH. Growth rate and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum. Nature. 1977;266:624-625. doi: 10.1038/266624a0
58. David JR, Moreteau B, Gauthier JP, Pétavy G, Stockel A, Imasheva AG. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale lines analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1994;26(3):229. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-26-3-229
59. Griffin RM, Dean R, Grace JL, Rydén P, Friberg U. The shared genome is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2168-2176. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst121
60. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005
61. Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J Evol Biol. 2001;14(5):685-693. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x
62. Berg EC, Maklakov AA. Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012;279(1745):4296-4302. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1345
63. Chen HY, Maklakov AA. Condition dependence of male mortality drives the evolution of sex differences in longevity. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2423-2427. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.055
64. Ward S, Carrel JS. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1979;73:304-321. doi: 10.1016/0012- 1606(79)90069-1