Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Volumn 28, Issue , 1997, Pages 659-687

  Fairbairn, D J ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

Allometric constraint; Correlational selection; Genetic correlation; Sexual dimorphism; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BODY SIZE; COEVOLUTION; SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM;

EID: 0031453093     PISSN: 00664162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659     Document Type: Review

References (168)

1. Abouheif E. 1995. A comparative analysis of the allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing Rensch's rule. MSc thesis. Concordia Univ., Montreal, Canada. 95 pp.
2. Abouheif E, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. Am. Nat. 149:540-62
3. Adams J, Greenwood PJ. 1987. Loading constraints, sexual selection and assortative mating in peracarid Crustacea. J. Zool. Lond. 211:35-46
4. Alexander RD, Hoogland JL, Howard RD, Noonan KM, Sherman PW. 1979. Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, ed. NA Chagnon, W Irons, pp. 402-35. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury
5. Andersen NM. 1994. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae): a phylogenetic approach. Ecoscience 1:208-14
6. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 599 pp.
7. Arak A. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in body size: a model and a test. Evolution 42:820-25
8. Arnold SJ, Duvall D. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317-48
9. Arnqvist G. 1992. Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider: inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment? Anim. Behav. 43:559-67
10. Barbault R. 1988. Body size, ecological constraints, and the evolution of life-history strategies. In Evolutionary Biology, ed. MK Hecht, B Wallace, 22:261-86. New York: Plenum
11. Bastos RP, Celio F, Haddad B. 1996. Breeding activity of the neotropical treefrog Hyla elegans (Anura, Hylidae). J. Herpetol. 30:355-60
12. Berry JF, Shine R. 1980. Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (order Testudines). Oecologia 44:185-91
13. Bjorklund M. 1990. A phylogenetic interpretation of sexual dimorphism in body size and ornament in relation to mating system in birds. J. Evol. Biol. 3:171-83
14. Blackith RE. 1957. Polymorphism in some Australian locusts and grasshoppers. Biometrics 13:183-96
15. Bourne GR. 1993. Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra. Anim. Behav. 45:1051-59
16. Brana F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in lacertid lizards: male head increase vs female abdomen increase? Oikos 75:511-23
17. Brooks DR, McLennan DA. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology and Behavior. London, UK: Univ. Chicago Press
18. Cabana G, Frewin A, Peters RH, Randall L. 1982. The effect of sexual size dimorphism on variations in reproductive effort of birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 120:17-25
19. Calder WA. 1984. Size, Function and Life History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
20. Campbell BC, ed. 1972. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 378 pp.
21. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-51
22. Clutton-Brock TH. 1985. Size, sexual dimorphism, and polygyny in Primates. See Ref. 76, pp. 51-60
23. Clutton-Brock TH, ed. 1988. Reproductive Success. Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
24. Clutton-Brock TH. 1994. The costs of sex. See Ref. 140, pp. 347-62
25. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guiness FE. 1988. Reproductive success in male red deer. See Ref. 23, pp. 325-43
26. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. 1984. Comparative approaches to investigating adaptation. In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. ed. J Krebs, N Davies, pp. 7-29. New York: Sinauer. 2nd ed.
27. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH, Rudder B. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269:797-800
28. Crump ML. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Misc. Publ. No. 61, Univ. Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist. Lawrence, KS
29. Darwin C. 1874. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Humboldt
30. DeFrenza J, Kirner RJ, Maly EJ, van Leeuwen HC. 1986. The relationships of sex-size ratio and season to mating intensity in some Calanoid copepods. Limnol. Oceangr. 31:491-96
31. Dodson G. 1987. The significance of sexual dimorphism in the mating system of two species of tephritid flies (Aciurina trixa and Valentibulla dodsoni) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Can. J. Zool. 65:194-98
32. Elgar MA. 1991. Sexual cannibalism, size dimorphism, and courtship behavior in orb-weaving spiders (Aranidae). Evolution 45:444-48
33. Emerson SB. 1994. Testing pattern predictions of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 143:848-69
34. Emlen D. 1996. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:1219-30
35. Fairbairn DJ. 1990. Factors influencing sexual size dimorphism in temperate water striders. Am. Nat. 136:61-86
36. Fairbairn DJ. 1992. The origins of allometry: size and shape polymorphism in the common waterstrider, Gerris remigis Say (Heteroptera, Gerridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45:167-68
37. Fairbairn DJ, Preziosi RF. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Am. Nat. 144:101-18
38. Fairbairn J, Shine R. 1993. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in seabirds of the southern hemisphere. Oikos 68:139-45
39. Falconer DS. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London, Longman. 3rd ed.
40. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15
41. Fitch HS. 1981. Sexual size differences in reptiles. Misc. Publ. No. 70, Univ. Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist. Lawrence, KS.
42. Fleagle JG. 1985. Size and adaptation in Primates. See Ref. 76, pp. 1-19
43. Flemming IA, Gross MR. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:637-57
44. Ford SM. 1994. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in body weight in Platyrrhines. Am. J. Primatol. 34:221-44
45. Forsman A, Shine R. 1995. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to frequency of reproduction in turtles (Testudines: Emydidae). Copeia 1995:727-29
46. Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harper KT. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597-99
47. Fukuyama K, Kusano T. 1989. Sexual size dimorphism in a Japanese stream-breeding frog, Buergeria buergeri (Rhacophoridae, Amphibia). Curr. Herpetol. East Asia, pp. 306-13
48. Gaulin SJC, Sailer LD. 1984. Sexual dimorphism in weight among the Primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. Int. J. Primatol. 5:515-35
49. Geber MA. 1995. Fitness effects of sexual dimorphism in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:222-23
50. Ghiselin MT. 1974. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
51. Gibbons WJ, Lovich JE. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in turtles with emphasis on the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta). Herpetol. Monogr. 4:1-29
52. Gotelli NJ, Spivey HR. 1992. Male parasitism and intersexual competition in a burrowing barnacle. Oecologia 91:474-80
53. Gould SJ. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41:587-640
54. Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 326:119-57
55. Grafen A. 1992. The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression. J. Theor. Biol. 156:405-23
56. Green AJ. 1992. Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functions. Anim. Behav. 43:170-72
57. Greenwood PJ, Adams J. 1987. The Ecology of Sex. London, UK: Edward Arnold. 74 pp.
58. Greenwood PJ, Wheeler P. 1985. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in birds and mammals: a hot-blooded hypothesis. In Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, ed. PH Harvey, M Slatkin, pp. 287-99. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. Hanken J, Wake DB. 1993. Miniaturization of body size: organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:501-19
60. Harvey AW. 1990. Sexual differences in contemporary selection acting on size in the hermit crab Clibanarius digueti. Am. Nat. 136:292-304
61. Harvey PH. 1982. On rethinking allometry. J. Theor. Biol. 95:37-41
62. Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH. 1983. The survival of the theory. New Sci. 5:313-15
63. Harvey PH, Mace GM. 1982. Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: problems of methodology. In Current Problems in Sociobiology, ed. King's College Sociobiology Group, pp. 343-61. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
64. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
65. Harvey PH, Ralls K. 1985. Homage to the null weasel. In Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, ed. MK Hecht, B Wallace, pp. 155-171. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
66. Head G. 1995. Selection on fecundity and variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism among spider species (class Aranae). Evolution 49:776-81
67. Hedrick AV, Temeles EJ. 1989. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:136-38
68. Helms KR. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism and sex ratios in bees and wasps. Am. Nat. 143:418-34
69. Höglund J. 1989. Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds: a comparative analysis. Am. Nat. 134:72-87
70. Holtby LB, Healey MC. 1990. Sex-specific life-history tactics and risk-taking in Coho salmon. Ecology 71:678-90
71. Howard RD. 1988. Reproductive success in two species of anurans. See Ref. 23, pp. 99-113
72. Hurlbutt B. 1987. Sexual size dimorphism in parasitoid wasps. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30:63-89
73. Huxley JS. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. London, UK: Methuen. 276 pp.
74. Iverson JB. 1991. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the evolution of modern kinosternine turtles. Herpetol. Monogr. 5:1-27
75. Jehl JR Jr, Murray BG Jr. 1986 The evolution of normal and reverse sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds and other birds. Curr. Ornithol. 3:1-86
76. Jungers WL, ed. 1985. Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. New York: Plenum. 491 pp.
77. Kawano K. 1995 Horn and wing allometry and male dimorphism in giant rhinoceros beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) of tropical Asia and America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88:92-99
78. LaBarbera M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:97-117
79. Lande R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Am. Nat. 33:402-16
80. Lande R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-307
81. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-26
82. Leutenegger W. 1978. Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates. Nature 272:610-11
83. Leutenegger W, Cheverud J. 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: ecological and size variables. Int. J. Primatol. 3:387-402
84. Leutenegger W, Cheverud J. 1985. Sexual dimorphism in Primates. The effects of size. See Ref. 76, pp. 33-60
85. Levenson H. 1990. Sexual size dimorphism in chipmunks. J. Mammal. 71:161-70
86. Levitan DR, Petersen C. 1995. Sperm limitation in the sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:228-31
87. Lincoln GA. 1994. Teeth, horns and antlers: the weapons of sex. See Ref. 140, pp. 131-58
88. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot. Rev. 43:177-216
89. Longland WS. 1989. Reversed sexual size dimorphism: its effect on prey selection by the great horned owl, Bubo virginianus. Oikos 54:395-98
90. Lovich JE, Gibbons JW. 1992. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Dev. Aging 56:269-81
91. Maddison WP. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-57
92. Madsen T, Shine R. 1994. Costs of reproduction influence the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in snakes. Evolution 48:1389-97
93. Marden JH. 1989. Effects of load-lifting constraints on the mating system of a dance fly. Ecology 70:496-502
94. Martin RD, Willner LA, Dettling A. 1994. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in primates. See Ref. 140, pp. 159-200
95. Martins EP, Garland T. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-57
96. Maynard Smith J. 1977. Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim. Behav. 25:1-9
97. McArdle BH. 1988. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can. J. Zool. 66:2329-39
98. McLachlin AJ. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in midges: strategies for flight in the rain-pool dweller Chironomous imicola (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 55:261-67
99. McMahon. T. 1973. Size and shape in biology. Science 179:1201-4
100. Meagher TR. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46:445-57
101. Meagher TR. 1994. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48:939-51
102. Moors PJ. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in the body size of mustelids (Carnivora): the roles of food habits and breeding systems. Oikos 34:147-58
103. Mueller HC. 1986. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in owls: an empirical analysis of possible selective factors. Wilson Bull. 98:387-406
104. Mueller HC, Meyer K. 1985. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size. A comparative analysis of the Falconiformes of the western Palearctic. Curr. Ornithol. 2:65-101
105. Naylor C, Adams J. 1987. Sexual dimorphism, drag constraints and male performance in Gammarus duebeni (Amphipoda). Oikos 48:23-27
106. Nudds TD, Kaminski RM. 1984. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to resource partitioning in North American dabbling ducks. Can. J. Zool. 62:2009-102
107. Nylin S, Wedell N. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism and comparative methods. In Phylogenetics and Ecology, ed. P Eggleton, R Vane-Wright, pp. 253-309. London: Academic
108. O'Neill KM. 1985. Egg size, prey size, and sexual size dimorphism in digger wasps (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Can. J. Zool. 63:2187-93
109. Oakes EJ. 1992. Lekking and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds: comparative approaches. Am. Nat. 140:665-84
110. Pagel MD. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156:431-42
111. Pagel MD, Harvey PH. 1988. The taxon-level problem in the evolution of mammalian brain size: facts and artifacts. Am. Nat. 132:344-59
112. Payne RB. 1984. Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Orthithol. Monogr. 33. Washington, DC: Am. Ornithol. Union
113. Peters RH. 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
114. Petrie M. 1988. Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: Large animals invest relatively more. Anim. Behav. 36:1174-79
115. Petrie M. 1992. Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and, if so, why? Anim. Behav. 43:173-75.
116. Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: body size, components of body size and male mating success. J. Evol. Biol. 9:317-36
117. Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: life-time fecundity selection on female total length and its consequences. Evolution 51:467-74
118. Price TD. 1984. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Darwin's finches. Am. Nat. 123:500-18
119. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Luh HK. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167:293-300
120. Ralls K. 1976. Mammals in which females are larger than males. Q. Rev. Biol. 51:245-76
121. Ralls K. 1977. Sexual dimorphism in mammals: avian models aand unanswered questions. Am. Nat. 111:917-38
122. Ralls K, Harvey PH. 1985. Geographic variation in size and sexual dimorphism of North American weasels. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25:119-67
123. Reeve JP, Fairbairn DF. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on body size: an empirical test of the quantitative genetic model. Evolution 50:1927-38
124. Reiss MJ. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in body size: are larger species more dimorphic? J. Theor. Biol. 121:163-72
125. Reiss MJ. 1989. The Allometry of Growth and Reproduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
126. Rensch B. 1960. Evolution above the Species Level. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
127. Reynolds JD, Harvey PH. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of sex differences. See Ref. 140, pp. 53-70
128. Ridley M. 1983. The Explanation of Organic Diversity. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
129. Rodriquez V, Jiménez F. 1990. Co-existance within a group of congeneric species of Acartia (Copepoda Calanoida): sexual dimorphism and ecological niche in Acartia grant. J. Plankton Res. 12:497-511
130. Roff DA. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. New York: Chapman & Hall
131. Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ. 1980. An evaluation of Gulland's method for fitting the Schaefer model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:1229-35
132. Rowe L. 1992. Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim. Behav. 44:189-202
133. Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1984. Scaling. Why is Animal Size so Important? New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
134. Selander RK. 1972. Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. See Ref. 20, pp. 180-230
135. Shine R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia 2:297-306
136. Shine R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64:419-61
137. Shine R. 1991. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am. Nat. 138:103-22
138. Shine R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 2:326-46
139. Shine R. 1994. Allometric patterns in the ecology of Australian snakes. Copeia 4:851-67
140. Short RV, Balaban E, ed. 1994. The Differences between the Sexes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 479 pp.
141. Sigurjonsdottir H. 1981. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in gamebirds, waterfowl and raptors. Omis Scand. 12:249-60
142. Sivinski JM, Dodson G. 1992. Sexual dimorphism in Anatrepha suspensa (Loew) and other Tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): possible roles of developmental rate, fecundity, and dispersal. J. Insect Behav. 5:491-506
143. Slatkin M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622-30
144. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. 3rd ed.
145. Stamps JA. 1983. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. In Lizard Ecology, ed. RB Huey, ER Pianka, TW Schoener, pp. 169-204. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
146. Stamps JA. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth after maturity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 50:123-45
147. Stearns SC. 1983. The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in mammals. Oikos 41:173-87
148. Stearns SC. 1984. The effects of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation in the life history traits of lizards and snakes. Am. Nat. 123:56-72.
149. Stubblefield JW, Seger J. 1994. Sexual dimorphism in the hymenoptera. See Ref. 140, pp. 71-103
150. Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. See Ref. 20, pp. 136-79
151. Van den Assem J. 1976. Male courtship behaviour, female receptivity signal, and size differences between the sexes in Pteromalinae (Hymen., Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae), and comparative notes on other chalcidoids. Netherlands J. Zool. 26:535-48
152. Vollrath F, Parker GA. 1992. Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders. Nature 360:156-59
153. Wallace B. 1987. Ritualistic combat and allometry. Am. Nat. 129:775-76
154. Weatherhead PJ. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in two savannah sparrow populations. Can. J. Zool. 58:412-15
155. Webster MS. 1992. Sexual dimorphism, mating system and body size in new world blackbirds (Icterinae). Evolution 46:1621-41
156. Weigensberg I, Fairbairn DJ. 1994. Conflicts of interest between the sexes: a study of mating interactions in a semi-aquatic bug. Anim. Behav. 48:893-90
157. Wheeler P, Greenwood PJ. 1983. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in birds of prey. Oikos 40:145-19
158. Wickman P-O. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design - a comparative study. Evolution 46:1525-36
159. Wickman P-O, Karlsson B. 1989. Abdomen size, body size and the reproductive effort of insects. Oikos 56:209-14
160. Wiklund C, Kaitala A. 1995. Sexual selection for large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: the effect of body size on male versus female reproductive success in Pieris napi. Behav. Ecol. 6:6-13
161. Wiklund C, Karlsson B. 1988. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to fecundity in some Swedish Satyrid butterflies. Am. Nat. 131:132-38
162. Wiley RH. 1974. Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Q. Rev. Biol. 49:201-27
163. Wilkinson GS. 1993. Artificial selection alters allometry in the salk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera:Diopsidae). Genet. Res. Camb. 62:213-22
164. Willson MF. 1983. Plant Reproductive Ecology. New York: Wiley
165. Willson MF. 1991. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism and plant phylogeny. Evol. Ecol. 5:69-87
166. Winquist T, Lemon RE. 1994. Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. Am. Nat. 143:95-116
167. Ydenberg RC, Forbes LS. 1991. The survival-reproduction selection equilibrium and reversed size dimorphism in raptors. Oikos 60:115-19
168. Zeng Z-B. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42:363-74