Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2016, Pages 370-391

  Huwe, Peter J ^a   Xu, Qifang ^a   Shapovalov, Maxim V ^a   Modi, Vivek ^a   Andrake, Mark D ^a   Dunbrack, Roland L ^a  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP11; Missense mutation phenotype prediction; Protein docking; Protein function; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

HOMODIMER; LIGAND; MONOMER; AMIDASE; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; GLYCOPROTEIN GP 120; GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL ANCHORED PROTEIN; MACROPHAGE STIMULATING PROTEIN; ONCOPROTEIN; PANTETHEINASE; PROTEIN BINDING; SCATTER FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MISSENSE MUTATION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MUTANT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; WILD TYPE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMIDOHYDROLASES; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYCLIC AMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASES; GPI-LINKED PROTEINS; HEPATOCYTE GROWTH FACTOR; HIV ENVELOPE PROTEIN GP120; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MUTATION, MISSENSE; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAINS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84978194664     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24997     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Kendrew JC, Bodo G, Dintzis HM, Parrish R, Wyckoff H, Phillips DC. A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis. Nature 1958;181:662-666.
2. Blake C, Koenig D, Mair G, North A, Phillips D, Sarma V. Structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 2 Angstrom resolution. Nature 1965;206:757-761.
3. Perutz MF, Kendrew JC, Watson HC. Structure and function of haemoglobin. J Mol Biol 1965;13:669-678.
4. Browne WJ, North A, Phillips D, Brew K, Vanaman TC, Hill RL. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine a-lactalbumin based on that of hen’s egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1969;42:65-86.
5. Greer J. Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1980;77:3393-3397.
6. Lustbader J, Arcoleo JP, Birken S, Greer J. Hemoglobin-binding site on haptoglobin probed by selective proteolysis. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:1227-1234.
7. Andersen CBF, Torvund-Jensen M, Nielsen MJ, de Oliveira CLP, Hersleth H-P, Andersen NH, Pedersen JS, Andersen GR, Moestrup SK. Structure of the haptoglobin-haemoglobin complex. Nature 2012;489:456-459.
8. Zhang YZ, Gould KL, Dunbrack RJ, Cheng H, Roder H, Golemis EA. The evolutionarily conserved Dim1 protein defines a novel branch of the thioredoxin fold superfamily. Physiol Genomics 1999; 1:109-118.
9. Shan X, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Christopher SA, Kruger WD. Mutations in the regulatory domain of cystathionine beta-synthase can functionally suppress patient-derived mutations in cis. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:635-643.
10. Cheng JD, Dunbrack RL, Jr., Valianou M, Rogatko A, Alpaugh RK, Weiner LM. Promotion of tumor growth by murine fibroblast activation protein, a serine protease, in an animal model. Cancer Res 2002;62:4767-4772.
11. Kundrat L, Martins J, Stith L, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Jaffe EK. A structural basis for half-of-the-sites metal binding revealed in Drosophila melanogaster porphobilinogen synthase. J Biol Chem 2003;278: 31325-31330.
12. Zhang R, Poustovoitov MV, Ye X, Santos HA, Chen W, Daganzo SM, Erzberger JP, Serebriiskii IG, Canutescu AA, Dunbrack RL, Pehrson JR, Berger JM, Kaufman PD, Adams PD. Formation of MacroH2A-containing senescence-associated heterochromatin foci and senescence driven by ASF1a and HIRA. Dev Cell 2005;8:19-30.
13. Tang Y, Poustovoitov MV, Zhao K, Garfinkel M, Canutescu A, Dunbrack R, Adams PD, Marmorstein R. Structure of a human ASF1a-HIRA complex and insights into specificity of histone chaperone complex assembly. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006;13:921-929.
14. Li C, Andrake M, Dunbrack R, Enders GH. A bifunctional regulatory element in human somatic Wee1 mediates cyclin A/Cdk2 binding and Crm1-dependent nuclear export. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30: 116-130.
15. Plotnikova OV, Pugacheva EN, Dunbrack RL, Golemis EA. Rapid calcium-dependent activation of Aurora-A kinase. Nat Commun 2010;1:8. doi:10103/ncomms1061.
16. Tong X, Zitserman D, Serebriiskii I, Andrake M, Dunbrack R, Roegiers F. Numb independently antagonizes Sanpodo membrane targeting and Notch signaling in Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21:802-810.
17. Roberts JL, Buckley RH, Luo B, Pei J, Lapidus A, Peri S, Wei Q, Shin J, Parrott RE, Dunbrack RL, Testa JR, Zhong X-P, Wiest DL. CD45-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency caused by uniparental disomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:10456-10461.
18. Yue P, Li Z, Moult J. Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease. J Mol Biol 2005;353:459-473.
19. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL, Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003; 12:2001-2014.
20. Yates CM, Filippis I, Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. SuSPect: enhanced prediction of single amino acid variant (SAV) phenotype using network features. J Mol Biol 2014;426:2692-2701.
21. Tovchigrechko A, Wells CA, Vakser IA. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci 2002;11:1888-1896.
22. Anishchenko I, Kundrotas PJ, Tuzikov AV, Vakser IA. Protein models docking benchmark 2. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2015;83: 891-897.
23. Kaufmann KW, Meiler J. Using Rosetta ligand for small molecule docking into comparative models. Plos One 2012;7:e50769.
24. Bordogna A, Pandini A, Bonati L. Predicting the accuracy of protein-ligand docking on homology models. J Comput Chem 2011; 32:81-98.
25. Fan H, Irwin JJ, Webb BM, Klebe G, Shoichet BK, Sali A. Molecular docking screens using comparative models of proteins. J Chem Inf Model 2009;49:2512-2527.
26. Ferrara P, Jacoby E. Evaluation of the utility of homology models in high throughput docking. J Mol Model 2007;13:897-905.
27. Cavasotto CN, Phatak SS. Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications. Drug Discov Today 2009;14: 676-683.
28. Hillisch A, Pineda LF, Hilgenfeld R. Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process. Drug Discov Today 2004;9:659-669.
29. Soro S, Tramontano A. The prediction of protein function at CASP 6. Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf 2005;61:201-213.
30. Lopez G, Rojas A, Tress M, Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2007;69:165-174.
31. Lopez G, Ezkurdia I, Tress ML. Assessment of ligand binding residue predictions in CASP 8. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2009;77: 138-146.
32. Schmidt T, Haas J, Cassarino TG, Schwede T. Assessment of ligandbinding residue predictions in CASP 9. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2011;79:126-136.
33. Gallo Cassarino T, Bordoli L, Schwede T. Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP 10. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2014;82:154-163.
34. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2006;65:392-406.
35. Kozakov D, Beglov D, Bohnuud T, Mottarella SE, Xia B, Hall DR, Vajda S. How good is automated protein docking? Proteins: Struct FunctBioinf 2013;81:2159-2166.
36. Xu Q, Canutescu AA, Wang G, Shapovalov M, Obradovic Z, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Statistical analysis of interface similarity in crystals of homologous proteins. J Mol Biol 2008;381:487-507.
37. Xu Q, Dunbrack RL, Jr. The protein common interface database (ProtCID)-a comprehensive database of interactions of homologous proteins in multiple crystal forms. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: D761-D770.
38. Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 1901;37: 547-549.
39. Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1. New Phytol 1912;11:37-50.
40. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O. SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W270-W277.
41. Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 2010;31:455-461.
42. Wei Q, Xu Q, Dunbrack RL. Prediction of phenotypes of missense mutations in human proteins from biological assemblies. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2013;81:199-213.
43. Wei Q, Dunbrack RL, Jr. The role of balanced training and testing data sets for binary classifiers in bioinformatics. Plos One 2013;8: e67863.
44. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W382-W388.
45. Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 2007;372:774-797.
46. Jin J, Xie X, Chen C, Park JG, Stark C, James DA, Olhovsky M, Linding R, Mao Y, Pawson T. Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci Signal 2009;2:ra76-ra76.
47. Vacic V, Iakoucheva LM, Lonardi S, Radivojac P. Graphlet kernels for prediction of functional residues in protein structures. J Comput Biol 2010;17:55-72.
48. Krause A, Stoye J, Vingron M. Large scale hierarchical clustering of protein sequences. BMC Bioinf 2005;6:15.
49. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profileprofile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1257-1275.
50. Jeske M, Bordi M, Glatt S, Müller S, Rybin V, Müller CW, Ephrussi A. The crystal structure of the Drosophila germline inducer Oskar identifies two domains with distinct Vasa helicase-and RNA-binding activities. Cell Rep 2015;12:587-598.
51. Mariani V, Biasini M, Barbato A, Schwede T. lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2722-2728.
52. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
53. Xu Q, Dunbrack RL Jr. Assignment of protein sequences to existing domain and family classification systems: Pfam and the PDB. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2763-2772.
54. Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Modeling of substrate specificity of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor protein beta-secretase. J Mol Biol 2000;300:241-248.
55. Magrane M, UniProt Consortium. UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database 2011;2011:bar009.
56. Project NGES. Exome variant server. Seattle, WA (URL: http://evsgswashingtonedu/EVS/) 2015;05/2015.
57. Forbes SA, Beare D, Gunasekaran P, Leung K, Bindal N, Boutselakis H, Ding M, Bamford S, Cole C, Ward S, Kok CY, Jia M, De T, Teague JW, Stratton MR, McDermott U, Campbell PJ. COSMIC: exploring the world’s knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D805-D811.
58. Wu T-J, Shamsaddini A, Pan Y, Smith K, Crichton DJ, Simonyan V, Mazumder R. A framework for organizing cancer-related variations from existing databases, publications and NGS data using a Highperformance Integrated Virtual Environment (HIVE). Database 2014;2014:bau022.
59. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010;7:248-249.
60. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33-38.
61. Riemersma M, Froese DS, van Tol W, Engelke UF, Kopec J, van Scherpenzeel M, Ashikov A, Krojer T, von Delft F, Tessari M, Buczkowska A, Swiezewska E, Jae LT, Brummelkamp TR, Manya H, Endo T, Bokhoven HV, Yue WW Lefeber DJ. Human ISPD is a cytidyltransferase required for dystroglycan O-mannosylation. Chem Biol 2015;22:1643-1652.
62. Willer T, Lee H, Lommel M, Yoshida-Moriguchi T, de Bernabe DBV, Venzke D, Cirak S, Schachter H, Vajsar J, Voit T, Muntoni F, Loder AS, Dobyns WB, Winder TL, Strahl S, Mathews KD, Nelson SF, Moore SA, Campbell KP. ISPD loss-of-function mutations disrupt dystroglycan O-mannosylation and cause Walker-Warburg syndrome. Nat Genet 2012;44:575-580.
63. Martin F, Malergue F, Pitari G, Philippe JM, Philips S, Chabret C, Granjeaud S, Mattei MG, Mungall AJ, Naquet P, Galland F. Vanin genes are clustered (human 6q22-24 and mouse 10A2B1) and encode isoforms of pantetheinase ectoenzymes. Immunogenetics 2001;53:296-306.
64. Ferreira DW, Naquet P, Manautou JE. Influence of Vanin-1 and catalytic products in liver during normal and oxidative stress conditions. Curr Med Chem 2015;22:2407-2416.
65. Kaskow BJ, Diepeveen LA, Proffitt JM, Rea AJ, Ulgiati D, Blangero J, Moses EK, Abraham LJ. Molecular prioritization strategies to identify functional genetic variants in the cardiovascular diseaseassociated expression QTL Vanin-1. Eur J Hum Genet 2014;22:688-695.
66. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:D561-D568.
67. Chatr-aryamontri A, Breitkreutz B-J, Oughtred R, Boucher L, Heinicke S, Chen D, Stark C, Breitkreutz A, Kolas N, O’Donnell L, Reguly T, Nixon J, Ramage L, Winter A, Sellam A, Chang C, Hirschman J, Theesfeld C, Rust J, Livstone MS, Dolinski K, Tyers M. The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;43:D470-D487. Database issue
68. Shapovalov MV, Wang Q, Xu Q, Andrake M, Dunbrack RL Jr. Bioassemblymodeler (BAM): user-friendly homology modeling of protein homo-and heterooligomers. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e98309.
69. Pancera M, Zhou T, Druz A, Georgiev IS, Soto C, Gorman J, Huang J, Acharya P, Chuang G-Y, Ofek G, Stewart-Jones GBE, Stuckey J, Bailer RT, Joyce MG, Louder MK, Tumba N, Yang Y, Zhang B, Cohen MS, Haynes BF, Mascola JR, Morris L, Munro JB, Blanchard SC, Mothes W, Connors M, Kwong PD. Structure and immune recognition of trimeric pre-fusion HIV-1 Env. Nature 2014; 514:455-461.
70. Reger AS, Yang MP, Koide-Yoshida S, Guo E, Mehta S, Yuasa K, Liu A, Casteel DE, Kim C. Crystal structure of the cGMP-dependent protein kinase II leucine zipper and Rab11b protein complex reveals molecular details of G-kinase-specific interactions. J Biol Chem 2014;289:25393-25403.
71. Chao KL, Gorlatova NV, Eisenstein E, Herzberg O. Structural basis for the binding specificity of human recepteur d’Origine Nantais (RON) receptor tyrosine kinase to macrophage-stimulating protein. J Biol Chem 2014;289:29948-29960.
72. Lyumkis D, Julien J-P, de Val N, Cupo A, Potter CS, Klasse P-J, Burton DR, Sanders RW, Moore JP, Carragher B, Wilson IA, Ward AB. Cryo-EM structure of a fully glycosylated soluble cleaved HIV-1 envelope trimer. Science 2013;342:1484-1490.
73. Julien J-P, Cupo A, Sok D, Stanfield RL, Lyumkis D, Deller MC, Klasse P-J, Burton DR, Sanders RW, Moore JP, Ward AB, Wilson IA. Crystal structure of a soluble cleaved HIV-1 envelope trimer. Science 2013;342:1477-1483.
74. Eathiraj S, Mishra A, Prekeris R, Lambright DG. Structural basis for Rab11-mediated recruitment of FIP3 to recycling endosomes. J Mol Biol 2006;364:121-135.
75. Jagoe WN, Lindsay AJ, Read RJ, McCoy AJ, McCaffrey MW, Khan AR. Crystal structure of rab11 in complex with rab11 family interacting protein 2. Structure 2006;14:1273-1283.
76. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
77. Stamos J, Lazarus RA, Yao X, Kirchhofer D, Wiesmann C. Crystal structure of the HGF b-chain in complex with the Sema domain of the Met receptor. Embo J 2004;23:2325-2335.
78. Chong-Kopera H, Inoki K, Li Y, Zhu T, Garcia-Gonzalo FR, Rosa JL, Guan K-L. TSC1 stabilizes TSC2 by inhibiting the interaction between TSC2 and the HERC1 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:8313-8316.
79. Perfetto L, Gherardini PF, Davey NE, Diella F, Helmer-Citterich M, Cesareni G. Exploring the diversity of SPRY/B30. 2-mediated interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 2013;38:38-46.
80. Woo J-S, Suh H-Y, Park S-Y, Oh B-H. Structural basis for protein recognition by B30. 2/SPRY domains. Mol Cell 2006;24:967-976.
81. Filippakopoulos P, Low A, Sharpe TD, Uppenberg J, Yao S, Kuang Z, Savitsky P, Lewis RS, Nicholson SE, Norton RS, Bullock AN. Structural basis for Par-4 recognition by the SPRY domain-and SOCS box-containing proteins SPSB1, SPSB2, and SPSB 4. J Mol Biol 2010;401:389-402.
82. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round II. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003;53(Suppl 6): 334-339.
83. Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1999; Suppl 3:2-6.
84. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins 2001; Suppl 5:2-7.
85. Taylor TJ, Tai CH, Huang YJ, Block J, Bai H, Kryshtafovych A, Montelione GT, Lee B. Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP 10. Proteins 2014;82:14-25.
86. Nugent T, Cozzetto D, Jones DT. Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2014;82:98-111.
87. Monastyrskyy B, D’Andrea D, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A. Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP 10. Proteins 2014;82:138-153.
88. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
89. Sanchez R, Sali A. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling byMODELLER-3. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1997;Suppl 1:50-58.
90. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Rossi A, Marti-Renom M, Karchin R, Webb BM, Eramian D, Shen MY, Kelly L, Melo F, Sali A. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D291-D295.
91. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Prediction of protein sidechain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
92. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL 4. Proteins 2009; 77:778-795.
93. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP 6. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2005;61:91-98.
94. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinf. 2008;9:40.
95. Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W244-W248.
96. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.
97. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3381-3385.
98. Bordoli L, Schwede T. Automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL workspace and the protein model portal. Methods Mol Biol 2012;857:107-136.
99. Kozakov D, Hall DR, Beglov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Shen Y, Li K, Zheng J, Vakili P, Paschalidis I, Vajda S. Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010;78:3124-3130.
100. Theobald DL, Steindel PA. Optimal simultaneous superpositioning of multiple structures with missing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28: 1972-1979.
101. Theobald DL, Wuttke DS. THESEUS: maximum likelihood superpositioning and analysis of macromolecular structures. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2171-2172.