The dynamic interactome and genomic targets of Polycomb complexes during stem-cell differentiation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 682-690

  Kloet, Susan L ^a   Makowski, Matthew M ^a   Baymaz, H Irem ^a   Van Voorthuijsen, Lisa ^a   Karemaker, Ino D ^a   Santanach, Alexandra ^b,c   Jansen, Pascal W T C ^a   Di Croce, Luciano ^b,c,d   Vermeulen, Michiel ^a,e  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b BARCELONA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN; CHROMATIN; HISTONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; ENHANCER REGION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; RECEPTOR DOWN REGULATION; STEM CELL; STOICHIOMETRY; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HISTONES; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; NEURAL STEM CELLS; POLYCOMB-GROUP PROTEINS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84977650406     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3248     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Laugesen, A. & Helin, K. Chromatin repressive complexes in stem cells, development, and cancer. Cell Stem Cell 14, 735-751 (2014).
2. Montavon, T. & Duboule, D. Chromatin organization and global regulation of Hox gene clusters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368, 20120367 (2013).
3. Simon, J.A. & Kingston, R.E. Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put. Mol. Cell 49, 808-824 (2013).
4. Di Croce, L. & Helin, K. Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1147-1155 (2013).
5. Wang, H. et al. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873-878 (2004).
6. de Napoles, M. et al. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev. Cell 7, 663-676 (2004).
7. Cao, R. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039-1043 (2002).
8. Müller, J. et al. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111, 197-208 (2002).
9. Scheuermann, J.C. et al. Histone H2A deubiquitinase activity of the Polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB. Nature 465, 243-247 (2010).
10. Schwartz, Y.B. & Pirrotta, V. A new world of Polycombs: unexpected partnerships and emerging functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 853-864 (2013).
11. Gao, Z. et al. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol. Cell 45, 344-356 (2012).
12. Smits, A.H., Jansen, P.W., Poser, I., Hyman, A.A. & Vermeulen, M. Stoichiometry of chromatin-associated protein complexes revealed by label-free quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e28 (2013).
13. Gao, Z. et al. An AUTS2-Polycomb complex activates gene expression in the CNS. Nature 516, 349-354 (2014).
14. Morey, L. et al. Polycomb regulates mesoderm cell fate-specification in embryonic stem cells through activation and repression mechanisms. Cell Stem Cell 17, 300-315 (2015).
15. Kaneko, S., Son, J., Shen, S.S., Reinberg, D. & Bonasio, R. PRC2 binds active promoters and contacts nascent RNAs in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1258-1264 (2013).
16. van den Boom, V. et al. Non-canonical PRC1.1 targets active genes independent of H3K27me3 and is essential for leukemogenesis. Cell Rep. 14, 332-346 (2016).
17. Fischle, W. et al. Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 17, 1870-1881 (2003).
18. Min, J., Zhang, Y. & Xu, R.M. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 17, 1823-1828 (2003).
19. Blackledge, N.P. et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation. Cell 157, 1445-1459 (2014).
20. Kalb, R. et al. Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in Polycomb repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 569-571 (2014).
21. Illingworth, R.S. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of RING1B is not essential for early mouse development. Genes Dev. 29, 1897-1902 (2015).
22. Pengelly, A.R., Kalb, R., Finkl, K. & Müller, J. Transcriptional repression by PRC1 in the absence of H2A monoubiquitylation. Genes Dev. 29, 1487-1492 (2015).
23. Poser, I. et al. BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat. Methods 5, 409-415 (2008).
24. Spruijt, C.G. et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 152, 1146-1159 (2013).
25. Alekseyenko, A.A., Gorchakov, A.A., Kharchenko, P.V. & Kuroda, M.I. Reciprocal interactions of human C10orf12 and C17orf96 with PRC2 revealed by BioTAP-XL cross-linking and affinity purification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2488-2493 (2014).
26. Maier, V.K. et al. Functional proteomic analysis of repressive histone methyltransferase complexes reveals ZNF518B as a G9A regulator. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1435-1446 (2015).
27. Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337-342 (2011).
28. Yang, B. et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat. Methods 9, 904-906 (2012).
29. Ciferri, C. et al. Molecular architecture of human polycomb repressive complex 2. eLife 1, e00005 (2012).
30. Shen, X. et al. Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 139, 1303-1314 (2009).
31. Baymaz, H.I. et al. MBD5 and MBD6 interact with the human PR-DUB complex through their methyl-CpG-binding domain. Proteomics 14, 2179-2189 (2014).
32. Maussion, G. et al. Investigation of genes important in neurodevelopment disorders in adult human brain. Hum. Genet. 134, 1037-1053 (2015).
33. Morey, L. et al. Nonoverlapping functions of the Polycomb group Cbx family of proteins in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 47-62 (2012).
34. O'Loghlen, A. et al. MicroRNA regulation of Cbx7 mediates a switch of Polycomb orthologs during ESC differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 10, 33-46 (2012).
35. Smits, A.H. & Vermeulen, M. Characterizing protein-protein interactions using mass spectrometry: challenges and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.014 (2016).
36. Hansen, K.H. et al. A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1291-1300 (2008).
37. Savatier, P., Huang, S., Szekely, L., Wiman, K.G. & Samarut, J. Contrasting patterns of retinoblastoma protein expression in mouse embryonic stem cells and embryonic fibroblasts. Oncogene 9, 809-818 (1994).
38. Conti, L. et al. Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biol. 3, e283 (2005).
39. Klose, R.J., Cooper, S., Farcas, A.M., Blackledge, N.P. & Brockdorff, N. Chromatin sampling: an emerging perspective on targeting polycomb repressor proteins. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003717 (2013).
40. Dignam, J.D., Lebovitz, R.M. & Roeder, R.G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1489 (1983).
41. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896-1906 (2007).
42. Makowski, M.M., Willems, E., Jansen, P.W. & Vermeulen, M. Cross-linking immunoprecipitation-MS (xIP-MS): topological analysis of chromatin-associated protein complexes using single affinity purification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 854-865 (2016).
43. Chambers, M.C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 918-920 (2012).
44. Combe, C.W., Fischer, L. & Rappsilber, J. xiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1137-1147 (2015).
45. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
46. Tiwari, V.K. et al. A chromatin-modifying function of JNK during stem cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 44, 94-100 (2012).
47. Riising, E.M. et al. Gene silencing triggers polycomb repressive complex 2 recruitment to CpG islands genome wide. Mol. Cell 55, 347-360 (2014).
48. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
49. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 503-510 (2010).
50. McLean, C.Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010).