Superresolution imaging reveals nanometer- and micrometer-scale spatial distributions of T-cell receptors in lymph nodes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 26, 2016, Pages 7201-7206

  Hu, Ying S ^a   Cang, Hu ^a   Lillemeier, Björn F ^a  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Plasma membrane; Protein cluster; Superresolution; T cell activation; T cell receptor

Indexed keywords

T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; CYTOCHROME C; INSECT PROTEIN; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; PEPTIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LYMPH NODE; MICROSCOPY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOCHASTIC OPTICAL RECONSTRUCTION MICROSCOPY; STRUCTURED ILLUMINATION MICROSCOPY; SURFACE AREA; T LYMPHOCYTE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; ANIMAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMMUNOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; CYTOCHROMES C; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INSECT PROTEINS; LYMPH NODES; MICE, TRANSGENIC; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PEPTIDES; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL;

EID: 84976575636     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1512331113     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bunnell SC, et al. (2002) T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol 158(7):1263-1275.
2. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML (2005) Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 202(8):1031-1036.
3. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A (1998) Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395(6697):82-86.
4. Grakoui A, et al. (1999) The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285(5425):221-227.
5. Hashimoto-Tane A, et al. (2011) Dynein-driven transport of T cell receptor microclusters regulates immune synapse formation and T cell activation. Immunity 34(6):919-931.
6. Betzig E, et al. (2006) Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313(5793):1642-1645.
7. Hess ST, Girirajan TP, Mason MD (2006) Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys J 91(11):4258-4272.
8. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3(10):793-795.
9. Heilemann M, et al. (2008) Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging withconventional fluorescent probes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47(33):6172-6176.
10. Gustafsson MGL (2005) Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: Wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(37):13081-13086.
11. Gustafsson MGL (2000) Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J Microsc 198(Pt 2):82-87.
12. Schamel WW, et al. (2005) Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med 202(4):493-503.
13. Lillemeier BF, et al. (2010) TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat Immunol 11(1):90-96.
14. Sherman E, et al. (2011) Functional nanoscale organization of signaling molecules downstream of the T cell antigen receptor. Immunity 35(5):705-720.
15. Plowman SJ, Muncke C, Parton RG, Hancock JF (2005) H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(43):15500-15505.
16. Lillemeier BF, Pfeiffer JR, Surviladze Z, Wilson BS, Davis MM (2006) Plasma membraneassociated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(50):18992-18997.
17. Zhou Y, Hancock JF (2015) Ras nanoclusters: Versatile lipid-based signaling platforms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853(4):841-849.
18. Cambi A, et al. (2006) Organization of the integrin LFA-1 in nanoclusters regulates its activity. Mol Biol Cell 17(10):4270-4281.
19. van Zanten TS, et al. (2009) Hotspots of GPI-anchored proteins and integrin nanoclusters function as nucleation sites for cell adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(44): 18557-18562.
20. Mattila PK, et al. (2013) The actin and tetraspanin networks organize receptor nanoclusters to regulate B cell receptor-mediated signaling. Immunity 38(3):461-474.
21. Pageon SV, et al. (2013) Superresolution microscopy reveals nanometer-scale reorganization of inhibitory natural killer cell receptors upon activation of NKG2D. Sci Signal 6(285):ra62.
22. Ariotti N, et al. (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor activation remodels the plasma membrane lipid environment to induce nanocluster formation. Mol Cell Biol 30(15):3795-3804.
23. MacGillavry HD, Song Y, Raghavachari S, Blanpied TA (2013) Nanoscale scaffolding domains within the postsynaptic density concentrate synaptic AMPA receptors. Neuron 78(4):615-622.
24. Nair D, et al. (2013) Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J Neurosci 33(32):13204-13224.
25. Hu YS, et al. (2013) Light-sheet Bayesian microscopy enables deep-cell superresolution imaging of heterochromatin in live human embryonic cells. Opt Nanoscopy 2:7.
26. Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X (2008) Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 319(5864):810-813.
27. Geisler C, et al. (2012) Drift estimation for single marker switching based imaging schemes. Opt Express 20(7):7274-7289.
28. Mlodzianoski MJ, et al. (2011) Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Opt Express 19(16):15009-15019.
29. Seder RA, Paul WE, Davis MM, Fazekas de St Groth B (1992) The presence of interleukin4 during in vitro priming determines the lymphokine-producing potential of CD4+ T cells from T cell receptor transgenic mice. J Exp Med 176(4):1091-1098.
30. Fernández-Suárez M, Ting AY (2008) Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(12):929-943.
31. Zell T, et al. (2001) Single-cell analysis of signal transduction in CD4 T cells stimulated by antigen in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10805-10810.
32. Varma R, Campi G, Yokosuka T, Saito T, Dustin ML (2006) T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 25(1):117-127.
33. Yokosuka T, et al. (2008) Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. Immunity 29(4):589-601.
34. Bajénoff M, et al. (2006) Stromal cell networks regulate lymphocyte entry, migration, and territoriality in lymph nodes. Immunity 25(6):989-1001.
35. Friedman RS, Beemiller P, Sorensen CM, Jacobelli J, Krummel MF (2010) Real-time analysis of T cell receptors in naive cells in vitro and in vivo reveals flexibility in synapse and signaling dynamics. J Exp Med 207(12):2733-2749.
36. Choudhuri K, et al. (2014) Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse. Nature 507(7490):118-123.
37. Das V, et al. (2004) Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. Immunity 20(5):577-588.
38. Patino-Lopez G, et al. (2008) Rab35 and its GAP EPI64C in T cells regulate receptor recycling and immunological synapse formation. J Biol Chem 283(26):18323-18330.
39. D'Oro U, et al. (2002) Regulation of constitutive TCR internalization by the zeta-chain. J Immunol 169(11):6269-6278.
40. Minami Y, Samelson LE, Klausner RD (1987) Internalization and cycling of the T cell antigen receptor: Role of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 262(27):13342-13347.
41. Liu H, Rhodes M, Wiest DL, Vignali DA (2000) On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. Immunity 13(5):665-675.
42. Brossard C, et al. (2005) Multifocal structure of the T cell-dendritic cell synapse. Eur J Immunol 35(6):1741-1753.
43. Saito T, Yokosuka T, Hashimoto-Tane A (2010) Dynamic regulation of T cell activation and co-stimulation through TCR-microclusters. FEBS Lett 584(24):4865-4871.
44. Tseng SY, Waite JC, Liu M, Vardhana S, Dustin ML (2008) T cell-dendritic cell immunological synapses contain TCR-dependent CD28-CD80 clusters that recruit protein kinase C theta. J Immunol 181(7):4852-4863.
45. Fahmy TM, Bieler JG, Edidin M, Schneck JP (2001) Increased TCR avidity after T cell activation: A mechanism for sensing low-density antigen. Immunity 14(2):135-143.
46. Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM (2002) Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 419(6909):845-849.
47. Purbhoo MA, Irvine DJ, Huppa JB, Davis MM (2004) T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse. Nat Immunol 5(5):524-530.
48. Wülfing C, et al. (2002) Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition. Nat Immunol 3(1):42-47.
49. Guizar-Sicairos M, Thurman ST, Fienup JR (2008) Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt Lett 33(2):156-158.
50. Nieuwenhuizen RP, et al. (2013) Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat Methods 10(6):557-562.