Biology of the sinus node and its disease

Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 28-34

  Choudhury, Moinuddin ^a   Boyett, Mark R ^a   Morris, Gwilym M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Biological pacemaker; Calcium clock; Membrane clock; Pacemaking; Sick sinus syndrome; Sinoatrial node; Sinus node disease; Sinus node dysfunction; Tachy brady

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CATECHOLAMINERGIC POLYMORPHIC VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; HEART AUTOMATICITY; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; ION CURRENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SINUS NODE; SINUS NODE DISEASE; SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA;

EID: 84975825146     PISSN: 20503369     EISSN: 20503377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.28     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Cunningham D, Charles R, Cunningham M, et al. Cardiac rhythm management UK national clinical audit report. National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. 2011.
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Dual-chamber pacemakers for symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome and/or atrioventricular block. Technology Appraisal 88. London: NICE, 2005.
3. Sodeck GH, Domanovits H, MeronG, et al. Compromising bradycardia: Management in the emergency department. Resuscitation 2007;73: 96-102.
4. Thery C, Gosselin B, Lekieffre J, et al. Pathology of sinoatrial node. Correlations with electrocardiographic findings in 111 patients. Am Heart J 1977;93: 735-40.
5. Evans R, Shaw D. Pathological studies in sinoatrial disorder (sick sinus syndrome). Br Heart J 1977;39: 778-86.
6. Morris GM, Kalman JM. Fibrosis, electrics and genetics. Perspectives in sinoatrial node disease. Circ J 2014;78: 1272-82.
7. Christoffels VM, Smits GJ, Kispert A, et al. Development of the pacemaker tissues of the heart. Circ Res 2010;106: 240-54.
8. Hoogaars WM, Engel A, Brons JF, et al. Tbx3 controls the sinoatrial node gene program and imposes pacemaker function on the atria. Genes Dev 2007;21: 1098-112.
9. Hoogaars WMH, Tessari A, Moorman AFM, et al. The transcriptional repressor Tbx3 delineates the developing central conduction system of the heart. Cardiovasc Res 2004;62: 489-99.
10. Espinoza-Lewis RA, Yu L, He F, et al. Shox2 is essential for the differentiation of cardiac pacemaker cells by repressing Nkx2-5. Dev Biol 2009;327: 376-85.
11. Kapoor N, Liang W, Marbán E, et al. Direct conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells by expression of Tbx18. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31: 54-62.
12. Wiese C, Grieskamp T, Airik R, et al. Formation of the sinus node head and differentiation of sinus node myocardium are independently regulated by Tbx18 and Tbx3. Circ Res 2009;104: 388-97.
13. Sanchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, Farre J, et al. Sinus node revisited in the era of electroanatomical mapping and catheter ablation. Heart 2005;91: 189-94.
14. Morris GM, D'Souza A, Dobrzynski H, et al. Characterization of a right atrial subsidiary pacemaker and acceleration of the pacing rate by HCN over-expression. Cardiovasc Res 2013;100: 160-9.
15. Rubenstein DS, Fox LM, McNulty JA, et al. Electrophysiology and ultrastructure of eustachian ridge from cat right atrium: A comparison with SA node. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1987;19: 965-76.
16. James TN, Sherf L, Fine G, et al. Comparative ultrastructure of the sinus node in man and dog. Circulation 1966;34: 139-63.
17. Fedorov VV, Glukhov AV, Chang R, et al. Optical mapping of the isolated coronary-perfused human sinus node. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56: 1386-94.
18. Matsuyama TA, Inoue S, Kobayashi Y, et al. Anatomical diversity and age-related histological changes in the human right atrial posterolateral wall. Europace 2004;6: 307-15.
19. Dobrzynski H, Li J, Tellez J, et al. Computer three-dimensional reconstruction of the sinoatrial node. Circulation 2005;111: 846-54.
20. Boyett MR, Honjo H, Kodama I. The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Cardiovasc Res 2000;47: 658-87.
21. Bleeker WK, Mackaay AJ, Masson-Pevet M, et al. Functional and morphological organization of the rabbit sinus node. Circ Res 1980;46: 11-22.
22. Ramanathan C, Jia P, Ghanem R, et al. Activation and repolarization of the normal human heart under complete physiological conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103: 6309-14.
23. Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Bromberg BI. Origin of the sinus impulse. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7: 263-74.
24. Gomes JA, Winters SL. The origins of the sinus node pacemaker complex in man: Demonstration of dominant and subsidiary foci. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9: 45-52.
25. Robinson RB, Siegelbaum SA. Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: From molecules to physiological function. Annu Rev Physiol 2003;65: 453-80.
26. DiFrancesco D. The role of the funny current in pacemaker activity. Circ Res 2009;106: 434-46.
27. Baruscotti M, Bucchi A, Viscomi C, et al. Deep bradycardia and heart block caused by inducible cardiac-specific knockout of the pacemaker channel gene Hcn4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108: 1705-10.
28. Herrmann S, Stieber J, Stöckl G, et al. HCN4 provides a 'depolarization reserve' and is not required for heart rate acceleration in mice. EMBO J 2007;26: 4423-32.
29. Harmar AJ, Hills RA, Rosser EM, et al. IUPHAR-DB: The IUPHAR database of G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37: D680-5.
30. Chandler NJ, Greener ID, Tellez JO, et al. Molecular architecture of the human sinus node: Insights into the function of the cardiac pacemaker. Circulation 2009;119: 1562-75.
31. Irisawa H, Brown HF, Giles W. Cardiac pacemaking in the sino-atrial node. Physiol Rev 1993;73: 197-227.
32. Lei M Honjo H, Kodama I, Boyett MR. Heterogeneous expression of the delayed-rectifier K+ currents IK,r and IK,s in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. J Physiol 2001;535: 703-14.
33. Chen B, Wu Y, Mohler PJ, et al. Local control of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in mouse sinoatrial node cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2009;47: 706-15.
34. Cheng H, Lederer MR, Xiao RP, et al. Excitation-contraction coupling in heart: New insights from Ca2+ sparks. Cell Calcium 1996;20: 129-140.
35. Mangoni ME, Traboulsie A, Leoni AL, et al. Bradycardia and slowing of the atrioventricular conduction in mice lacking Cav3.1/a1G T-type calcium channels. Circ Res 2006;98: 1422-30.
36. Bogdanov KY, Vinogradova TM, Lakatta EG. Sinoatrial nodal cell ryanodine receptor and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger: Molecular partners in pacemaker regulation. Circ Res 2001;88: 1254-8.
37. Monfredi O, Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG. Modern concepts concerning the origin of the heartbeat. Physiology 2013;28: 74-92.
38. Zipes DP, Jalife J. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Fifth edition. Philadelphie, US: Saunders, 2009.
39. Vinogradova TM, Brochet DX, Sirenko S, et al. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pumping kinetics regulates timing of local Ca2+ releases and spontaneous beating rate of rabbit sinoatrial node pacemaker cells. Circ Res 2010;107: 767-75.
40. Guidelines for clinical intracardiac electrophysiologic studies. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee to Assess Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiologic Studies). J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14: 1827-42.
41. Alboni P, Malcarne C, Pedroni P, et al. Electrophysiology of normal sinus node with and without autonomic blockade. Circulation 1982;65: 1236-42.
42. Sanders P, Morton JB, Kistler PM, et al. Electrophysiological and electroanatomic characterization of the atria in sinus node disease: Evidence of diffuse atrial remodeling. Circulation 2004;109: 1514-22.
43. Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M, et al. The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients. Am Heart J 2000;140: 541-51.
44. I Shiraishi, T Takamatsu, T Minamikawa, et al. Quantitative histological analysis of the human sinoatrial node during growth and aging. Circulation 1992;85: 2176-84.
45. Lei M, Zhang H, Grace AA, et al. SCN5A and sinoatrial node pacemaker function. Cardiovasc Res 2007;74: 356-65.
46. Yanni J, Tellez JO, Sutyagin PV, et al. Structural remodelling of the sinoatrial node in obese old rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010;48: 653-62.
47. Jones SA, Lancaster MK, Boyett MR. Ageing-related changes of connexins and conduction within the sinoatrial node. J Physiol 2004;560: 429-37.
48. Tellez JO, Dobrzynski H, Greener ID, et al. Differential expression of ion channel transcripts in atrial muscle and sinoatrial node in rabbit. Circ Res 2006;99: 1384-93.
49. Jones SA, Boyett MR, Lancaster MK. Declining into failure: The age-dependent loss of the L-type calcium channel within the sinoatrial node. Circulation 2007;115: 1183-90.
50. Tellez JO, Mczewski M, Yanni J, et al. Ageing-dependent remodelling of ion channel and Ca2+ clock genes underlying sino-atrial node pacemaking. Exp Physiol 2011;96: 1163-78.
51. Hao X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. TGF-ß1-mediated fibrosis and ion channel remodeling are key mechanisms in producing the sinus node dysfunction associated with SCN5A deficiency and aging. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4: 397-406.
52. Manios EG, Kanoupakis EM, Mavrakis HE, et al. Sinus pacemaker function after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: Is sinus node remodeling related with recurrence? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12: 800-6.
53. Elvan A, Wylie K, Zipes DP. Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs: Electrophysiological remodeling. Circulation 1996;94: 2953-60.
54. Joung B, Hwang HJ, Pak HN, et al. Abnormal response of superior sinoatrial node to sympathetic stimulation is a characteristic finding in patients with atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradycardia/clinical perspective. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4: 799-807.
55. Park J, Shim J, Uhm JS, et al. Post-shock sinus node recovery time is an independent predictor of recurrence after catheter ablation of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2013;168: 1937-42.
56. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK, et al. Electrical remodeling of the atria associated with paroxysmal and chronic atrial flutter. Circulation 2000;102: 1807-13.
57. Yeh YH, Burstein B, Qi XY, et al. Funny current downregulation and sinus node dysfunction associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia: A molecular basis for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome. Circulation 2009;119: 1576-85.
58. Schulze-Bahr E, Neu A, Friederich P, et al. Pacemaker channel dysfunction in a patient with sinus node disease. J Clin Invest. 2003;111: 1537-45.
59. Milanesi R, Baruscotti M, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, et al. Familial sinus bradycardia associated with a mutation in the cardiac pacemaker channel. N Engl J Med 2006;354: 151-7.
60. Nof E, Luria D, Brass D, et al. Point mutation in the HCN4 cardiac ion channel pore affecting synthesis, trafficking, and functional expression is associated with familial asymptomatic sinus bradycardia. Circulation 2007;116: 463-70.
61. Duhme N, Schweizer PA, Thomas D, et al. Altered HCN4 channel C-linker interaction is associated with familial tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2013;34: 2768-75.
62. Laish-Farkash A, Glikson M, Brass D, et al. A novel mutation in the HCN4 gene causes symptomatic sinus bradycardia in Moroccan Jews. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21: 1365-72.
63. Ruan Y, Liu N, Priori SG. Sodium channel mutations and arrhythmias. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009;6: 337-48.
64. Butters TD, Aslanidi OV, Inada S, et al. Mechanistic links between Na+ channel (SCN5A) mutations and impaired cardiac pacemaking in sick sinus syndrome. Circ Res 2010;107: 126-37.
65. Postma AV, Denjoy I, Hoorntje TM, et al. Absence of calsequestrin 2 causes severe forms of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res 2002;91: E21-26.
66. Postma AV, Denjoy I, Kamblock J, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: RYR2 mutations, bradycardia, and follow up of the patients. J Med Genet 2005;42: 863-70.
67. Le Scouarnec S, Bhasin N, Vieyres C, et al. Dysfunction in ankyrin-B-dependent ion channel and transporter targeting causes human sinus node disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 15617-22.
68. Baldesberger S, Bauersfeld U, Candinas R, et al. Sinus node disease and arrhythmias in the long-term follow-up of former professional cyclists. Eur Heart J 2008;29: 71-8.
69. Boyett MR, D'Souza A, Zhang H, et al. Viewpoint: Is the resting bradycardia in athletes the result of remodeling of the sinoatrial node rather than high vagal tone? J Appl Physiol 1985;114: 1351-5.
70. D'Souza A, Bucchi A, Johnsen AB, et al. Exercise training reduces resting heart rate via downregulation of the funny channel HCN4. Nat Commun 2014;13: 3775.
71. Rokseth R, Hatle L. Sinus arrest in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1971;33: 639-42.
72. Ando' G, Gaspardone A, Proietti I. Acute thrombosis of the sinus node artery: Arrhythmological implications. Heart Rhythm 2003;89: E5.
73. Shaw DB, Linker NJ, Heaver PA, et al. Chronic sinoatrial disorder (sick sinus syndrome): A possible result of cardiac ischaemia. Br Heart J 1987;58: 598-607.
74. Alboni P, Baggioni GF, Scarfò S, et al. Role of sinus node artery disease in sick sinus syndrome in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1991;67: 1180-4.
75. Engel TR, Meister SG, Feitosa GS, et al. Appraisal of sinus node artery disease. Circulation 1975;52: 286-91.
76. Lakatta EG, DiFrancesco D. What keeps us ticking: A funny current, a calcium clock, or both? J Mol Cell Cardiol 2009;47: 157-70.
77. Denyer JC, Brown HF. Pacemaking in rabbit isolated sino-atrial node cells during Cs+ block of the hyperpolarization-activated current If. J Physiol 1990;429: 401-9.
78. Liu J, Dobrzynski H, Yanni J, et al. Organisation of the mouse sinoatrial node: Structure and expression of HCN channels. Cardiovasc Res 2007;73: 729-38.
79. Bakker ML, Boink GJ, Boukens BJ, et al. T-box transcription factor TBX3 reprogrammes mature cardiac myocytes into pacemaker-like cells. Cardiovasc Res 2012;94: 439-49.
80. Hu YF, Dawkins JF, Cho HC, et al. Biological pacemaker created by minimally invasive somatic reprogramming in pigs with complete heart block. Sci Transl Med 2014;6: 245ra294.
81. Miake J, Marban E, Nuss HB. Biological pacemaker created by gene transfer. Nature 2002;419: 132-3.
82. Plotnikov AN, Sosunov EA, Qu J, et al. Biological pacemaker implanted in canine left bundle branch provides ventricular escape rhythms that have physiologically acceptable rates. Circulation 2004;109: 506-12.
83. Boink GJJ, Duan L, Nearing BD, et al. HCN2/SkM1 gene transfer into canine left bundle branch induces stable, autonomically responsive biological pacing at physiological heart rates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61: 1192-201.
84. Chandler N, Aslanidi O, Buckley D, et al. Computer three-dimensional anatomical reconstruction of the human sinus node and a novel paranodal area. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011;294: 970-9.
85. Shibata N, Inada S, Mitsui K, et al. Pacemaker shift in the rabbit sinoatrial node in response to vagal nerve stimulation. Exp Physiol 2001;86: 177-84.
86. Monfredi O, Dobrzynski H, Mondal T, et al. The anatomy and physiology of the sinoatrial node-A contemporary review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33: 1392-406.
87. Zicha S, Fernandez-Velasco M, Lonardo G, et al. Sinus node dysfunction and hyperpolarization-activated (HCN) channel subunit remodeling in a canine heart failure model. Cardiovasc Res 2005;66: 472-81.