Robustness of MEK-ERK Dynamics and Origins of Cell-to-Cell Variability in MAPK Signaling

Cell Reports

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2524-2535

  Filippi, Sarah ^a   Barnes, Chris P ^b   Kirk, Paul D W ^a   Kudo, Takamasa ^c   Kunida, Katsuyuki ^c   McMahon, Siobhan S ^a   Tsuchiya, Takaho ^c   Wada, Takumi ^c   Kuroda, Shinya ^c,d   Stumpf, Michael P H ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE; NERVE GROWTH FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CELL HETEROGENEITY; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; PC12 CELL LINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MAPK SIGNALING; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; RAT; TIME FACTOR;

ANIMALS; EXTRACELLULAR SIGNAL-REGULATED MAP KINASES; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PC12 CELLS; PHOSPHORYLATION; RATS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84974718795     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aoki K., Yamada M., Kunida K., Yasuda S., Matsuda M. Processive phosphorylation of ERK MAP kinase in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:12675-12680.
2. Ashall L., Horton C.A., Nelson D.E., Paszek P., Harper C.V., Sillitoe K., Ryan S., Spiller D.G., Unitt J.F., Broomhead D.S., et al. Pulsatile stimulation determines timing and specificity of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription. Science 2009, 324:242-246.
3. Balázsi G., van Oudenaarden A., Collins J.J. Cellular decision making and biological noise: from microbes to mammals. Cell 2011, 144:910-925.
4. Batchelor E., Loewer A., Mock C., Lahav G. Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:488.
5. Bowsher C.G., Swain P.S. Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:E1320-E1328.
6. Colman-Lerner A., Gordon A., Serra E., Chin T., Resnekov O., Endy D., Pesce C.G., Brent R. Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 2005, 437:699-706.
7. Del Moral P., Doucet A., Jasra A. Sequential Monte Carlo samplers. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 2006, 68:411-436.
8. Elf J., Ehrenberg M. Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. Genome Res. 2003, 13:2475-2484.
9. Elowitz M.B., Levine A.J., Siggia E.D., Swain P.S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 2002, 297:1183-1186.
10. Eser U., Falleur-Fettig M., Johnson A., Skotheim J.M. Commitment to a cellular transition precedes genome-wide transcriptional change. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:515-527.
11. Ferm L., Lötstedt P., Hellander A. A hierarchy of approximations of the master equation scaled by a size parameter. J. Sci. Comput. 2008, 34:127-151.
12. Ferrell J.E., Bhatt R.R. Mechanistic studies of the dual phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:19008-19016.
13. Ferrell J.E., Ha S.H. Ultrasensitivity part II: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014, 39:556-569.
14. Fujita K.A., Toyoshima Y., Uda S., Ozaki Y., Kubota H., Kuroda S. Decoupling of receptor and downstream signals in the Akt pathway by its low-pass filter characteristics. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:ra56.
15. Geva-Zatorsky N., Rosenfeld N., Itzkovitz S., Milo R., Sigal A., Dekel E., Yarnitzky T., Liron Y., Polak P., Lahav G., et al. Oscillations and variability in the p53 system. Mol. Sys. Biol. 2006, Published online June 13, 2006.
16. Golightly A., Wilkinson D.J. Bayesian inference for Markov jump processes with informative observations. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2015, 14:169-188.
17. Greene L.A., Tischler A.S. Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73:2424-2428.
18. Harrington H.A., Komorowski M., Beguerisse-Diaz M., Ratto G.M., Stumpf M.P.H. Mathematical modeling reveals the functional implications of the different nuclear shuttling rates of Erk1 and Erk2. Phys. Biol. 2012, 9:36001.
19. Harrington H.A., Feliu E., Wiuf C., Stumpf M.M.P. Cellular compartments cause multistability and allow cells to process more information. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:1824-1831.
20. Hilfinger A., Paulsson J. Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:12167-12172.
21. Hindmarsh A.C., Brown P.N., Grant K.E., Lee S.L., Serban R., Shumaker D.E., Woodward C.S. SUNDIALS: suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM T. on Math. Software 2005, 31:363-396.
22. Inder K., Harding A., Plowman S.J., Philips M.R., Parton R.G., Hancock J.F. Activation of the MAPK module from different spatial locations generates distinct system outputs. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:4776-4784.
23. Jeffreys H. Theory of Probability 1961, Oxford University Press.
24. Jeschke M., Baumgärtner S., Legewie S. Determinants of cell-to-cell variability in protein kinase signaling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9:e1003357.
25. Johnston I.G. Efficient parametric inference for stochastic biological systems with measured variability. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2014, 13:379-390.
26. Kamentsky L., Jones T.R., Fraser A., Bray M.A., Logan D.J., Madden K.L., Ljosa V., Rueden C., Eliceiri K.W., Carpenter A.E. Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:1179-1180.
27. Kiel C., Serrano L. Cell type-specific importance of Ras-c-Raf complex association rate constants for MAPK signaling. Sci. Signal 2009, 2:ra38.
28. Kirk P., Thorne T., Stumpf M.P. Model selection in systems and synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24:767-774.
29. Komorowski M., Finkenstädt B., Rand D. Using a single fluorescent reporter gene to infer half-life of extrinsic noise and other parameters of gene expression. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:2759-2769.
30. Komorowski M., Zurauskiene J., Stumpf M.P.H. StochSens--Matlab package for sensitivity analysis of stochastic chemical systems. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:731-733.
31. Komorowski M., Miekisz J., Stumpf M.P. Decomposing noise in biochemical signaling systems highlights the role of protein degradation. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:1783-1793.
32. Kussell E., Leibler S. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 2005, 309:2075-2078.
33. Mc Mahon S.S., Lenive O., Filippi S., Stumpf M.P.H. Information processing by simple molecular motifs and susceptibility to noise. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12:0597.
34. Michailovici I., Harrington H.A., Azogui H.H., Yahalom-Ronen Y., Plotnikov A., Ching S., Stumpf M.P., Klein O.D., Seger R., Tzahor E. Nuclear to cytoplasmic shuttling of ERK promotes differentiation of muscle stem/progenitor cells. Development 2014, 141:2611-2620.
35. Miyanari Y., Torres-Padilla M.-E. Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog. Nature 2012, 483:470-473.
36. Mody A., Weiner J., Ramanathan S. Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:484-491.
37. Nelson D.E., Ihekwaba A.E., Elliott M., Johnson J.R., Gibney C.A., Foreman B.E., Nelson G., See V., Horton C.A., Spiller D.G., et al. Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 2004, 306:704-708.
38. Ortega F., Garcés J.L., Mas F., Kholodenko B.N., Cascante M. Bistability from double phosphorylation in signal transduction. Kinetic and structural requirements. FEBS J. 2006, 273:3915-3926.
39. Ozaki Y., Uda S., Saito T.H., Chung J., Kubota H., Kuroda S. A quantitative image cytometry technique for time series or population analyses of signaling networks. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9955.
40. Paszek P., Ryan S., Ashall L., Sillitoe K., Harper C.V., Spiller D.G., Rand D.A., White M.R.H. Population robustness arising from cellular heterogeneity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:11644-11649.
41. Piala A.T., Humphreys J.M., Goldsmith E.J. MAP kinase modules: the excursion model and the steps that count. Biophys. J. 2014, 107:2006-2015.
42. Pujadas E., Feinberg A.P. Regulated noise in the epigenetic landscape of development and disease. Cell 2012, 148:1123-1131.
43. Quaranta V., Garbett S.P. Not all noise is waste. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:269-272.
44. Roberts P.J., Der C.J. Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26:3291-3310.
45. Rué P., Martinez Arias A. Cell dynamics and gene expression control in tissue homeostasis and development. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2015, 11:792.
46. Saito T.H., Uda S., Tsuchiya T., Ozaki Y., Kuroda S. Temporal decoding of MAP kinase and CREB phosphorylation by selective immediate early gene expression. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e57037.
47. Santos S.D.M., Verveer P.J., Bastiaens P.I.H. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:324-330.
48. Santos S.D.M., Wollman R., Meyer T., Ferrell J.E.J. Spatial positive feedback at the onset of mitosis. Cell 2012, 149:1500-1513.
49. Sasagawa S., Ozaki Y.-i., Fujita K., Kuroda S. Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:365-373.
50. Schoeberl B., Eichler-Jonsson C., Gilles E.D., Müller G. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:370-375.
51. Schröter C., Rué P., Mackenzie J.P., Martinez Arias A. FGF/MAPK signaling sets the switching threshold of a bistable circuit controlling cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. Development 2015, 142:4205-4216.
52. Selimkhanov J., Taylor B., Yao J., Pilko A., Albeck J., Hoffmann A., Tsimring L., Wollman R. Systems biology. Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks. Science 2014, 346:1370-1373.
53. Shahrezaei V., Ollivier J.F., Swain P.S. Colored extrinsic fluctuations and stochastic gene expression. Mol. Sys. Biol. 2008, 4.
54. Silk D., Kirk P.D., Barnes C.P., Toni T., Rose A., Moon S., Dallman M.J., Stumpf M.P.H. Designing attractive models via automated identification of chaotic and oscillatory dynamical regimes. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:489.
55. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis 1986, CRC Press.
56. Spencer S.L., Gaudet S., Albeck J.G., Burke J.M., Sorger P.K. Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 2009, 459:428-432.
57. Spiller D.G., Wood C.D., Rand D.A., White M.R.H. Measurement of single-cell dynamics. Nature 2010, 465:736-745.
58. Stumpf M.P.H., Laidlaw Z., Jansen V.A.A. Herpes viruses hedge their bets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:15234-15237.
59. Sturm O.E., Orton R., Grindlay J., Birtwistle M., Vyshemirsky V., Gilbert D., Calder M., Pitt A., Kholodenko B., Kolch W. The mammalian MAPK/ERK pathway exhibits properties of a negative feedback amplifier. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:ra90.
60. Swain P.S., Siggia E.D. The role of proofreading in signal transduction specificity. Biophys. J. 2002, 82:2928-2933.
61. Swain P.S., Elowitz M.B., Siggia E.D. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:12795-12800.
62. Takahashi K., Tanase-Nicola S., ten Wolde P.R. Spatio-temporal correlations can drastically change the response of a MAPK pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:2473-2478.
63. Toni T., Tidor B. Combined model of intrinsic and extrinsic variability for computational network design with application to synthetic biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9:e1002960.
64. Toni T., Ozaki Y., Kirk P., Kuroda S., Stumpf M.P.H. Elucidating the in vivo phosphorylation dynamics of the ERK MAP kinase using quantitative proteomics data and Bayesian model selection. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8:1921-1929.
65. Toyoshima Y., Kakuda H., Fujita K.A., Uda S., Kuroda S. Sensitivity control through attenuation of signal transfer efficiency by negative regulation of cellular signalling. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:743.
66. Uda S., Saito T.H., Kudo T., Kokaji T., Tsuchiya T., Kubota H., Komori Y., Ozaki Y., Kuroda S. Robustness and compensation of information transmission of signaling pathways. Science 2013, 341:558-561.
67. Voliotis M., Perrett R.M., McWilliams C., McArdle C.A., Bowsher C.G. Information transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:E326-E333.
68. Zhou Y., Liepe J., Sheng X., Stumpf M.P.H., Barnes C. GPU accelerated biochemical network simulation. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:874-876.