Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2016, Pages 4-14

  Moult, John ^a   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^b   Kryshtafovych, Andriy ^b   Schwede, Torsten ^c   Tramontano, Anna ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

CASP; Community wide experiment; Protein structure modeling

Indexed keywords

CASP11 PROTEIN; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84973135318     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25064     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223–230.
2. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii–v.
3. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round II. Proteins 1997;Suppl.1:2–6.
4. Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins 1999;Suppl.3:2–6.
5. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins 2001; Suppl.5:2–7.
6. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round V. Proteins 2003;53 Suppl.6:334–339.
7. Moult J, Fidelis K, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round 6. Proteins 2005;61(Suppl.7):3–7.
8. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: round VII. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl.8):3–9.
9. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Rost B, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: round VIII. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl.9):1–4.
10. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IX. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl.10):1–5.
11. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round X. Proteins 2014;82(Suppl.2):1–6.
12. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking, scoring, and affinity prediction in CAPRI. Proteins 2013;81:2082–2095.
13. Monastyrskyy B, D’Andrea D, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A. New encouraging developments in contact prediction: Assessment of the CASP11 results. Proteins 2015. DOI: 10:1002/prot24943.
14. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:309–317.
15. Lesk AM. CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. Proteins 1997; Suppl.1:151–166.
16. Monastyrskyy B, D’Andrea D, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A. Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10. Proteins 2014;82(Suppl.2):138–153.
17. Baba K, Shibata R, Sibuya M. Partial correlation and conditional correlation as measures of conditional independence. Aust Nz J Stat. 2004;46:657–664.
18. Binney JJ, Dowrick NJ, Fisher AJ, Newman MEJ. The theory of critical phenomena: An introduction to the renormalization group, Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.
19. Burger L, van Nimwegen E. Disentangling direct from indirect coevolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000633
20. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS, Sander C, Zecchina R, Onuchic JN, Hwa T, Weigt M. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:E1293–1301.
21. Jones DT, Buchan DW, Cozzetto D, Pontil M. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estima tion on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:184–190.
22. Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:15674– 15679.
23. Lim K, Zhang H, Tempczyk A, Bonander N, Toedt J, Howard A, Eisenstein E, Herzberg O. Crystal structure of YecO from Haemo-philus influenzae (HI0319) reveals a methyltransferase fold and a bound S-adenosylhomocysteine. Proteins 2001;45:397–407.
24. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl.9):66–80.
25. Mao B, Guan R, Montelione GT. Improved technologies now routinely provide protein NMR structures useful for molecular replacement. Structure 2011;19:757–766.
26. Mao B, Tejero R, Baker D, Montelione GT. Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136: 1893–1906.
27. Hiller S, Garces RG, Malia TJ, Orekhov VY, Colombini M, Wagner G. Solution structure of the integral human membrane protein VDAC-1 in detergent micelles. Science 2008;321:1206–1210.
28. Raman S, Lange OF, Rossi P, Tyka M, Wang X, Aramini J, Liu G, Ramelot TA, Eletsky A, Szyperski T, Kennedy MA, Prestegard J, Montelione GT, Baker D. NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science 2010;327: 1014–1018.
29. Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song Y, Lee HW, Aramini JM, Ertekin A, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:10873–10878.
30. Tugarinov V, Choy WY, Orekhov VY, Kay LE. Solution NMR-derived global fold of a monomeric 82-kDa enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:622–627.
31. Grishaev A, Tugarinov V, Kay LE, Trewhella J, Bax A. Refined solution structure of the 82-kDa enzyme malate synthase G from joint NMR and synchrotron SAXS restraints. J Biomol Nmr 2008;40: 95–106.
32. Sgourakis NG, Natarajan K, Ying J, Vogeli B, Boyd LF, Margulies DH, Bax A. The structure of mouse cytomegalovirus m04 protein obtained from sparse NMR data reveals a conserved fold of the m02-m06 viral immune modulator family. Structure 2014;22:1263– 1273.
33. Gardner KH, Rosen MK, Kay LE. Global folds of highly deuterated, methyl-protonated proteins by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry 1997;36:1389–1401.
34. Rosen MK, Gardner KH, Willis RC, Parris WE, Pawson T, Kay LE. Selective methyl group protonation of perdeuterated proteins. J Mol Biol 1996;263:627–636.
35. Tugarinov V, Kanelis V, Kay LE. Isotope labeling strategies for the study of high-molecular-weight proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Protocols 2006;1:749–754.
36. Zheng D, Huang YJ, Moseley HN, Xiao R, Aramini J, Swapna GV, Montelione GT. Automated protein fold determination using a minimal NMR constraint strategy. Protein Sci A Publ Protein Soc 2003; 12:1232–1246.
37. Huang YJ, Moseley HN, Baran MC, Arrowsmith C, Powers R, Tejero R, Szyperski T, Montelione GT. An integrated platform for automated analysis of protein NMR structures. Methods Enzymol 2005;394:111–141.
38. Huang YJ, Powers R, Montelione GT. Protein NMR recall, precision, and F-measure scores (RPF scores): structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:1665–1674.
39. Huang YJ, Tejero R, Powers R, Montelione GT. A topology-constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data. Proteins 2006;62:587–603.
40. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T, Warren GL. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998;54:905–921.
41. Brunger AT. Version 1.2 of the crystallography and NMR system. Nat Protoc 2007;2:2728–2733.
42. Rappsilber J. The beginning of a beautiful friendship: cross-linking/ mass spectrometry and modelling of proteins and multi-protein complexes. J Struct Biol 2011;173:530–540.
43. Walzthoeni T, Leitner A, Stengel F, Aebersold R. Mass spectrometry supported determination of protein complex structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013;23:252–260.
44. Belsom A, Schneider M, Fischer L, Brock O, Rappsilber J. Serum albumin domain structures in human blood serum by mass spectrometry and computational biology. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015;15: 1015–1016.
45. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Ceriani M, Tramontano A. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl.8):175–183.
46. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl.9):157–166.
47. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Tramontano A. Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl.10):91–106.
48. Kryshtafovych A, Barbato A, Fidelis K, Monastyrskyy B, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Assessment of the assessment: evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10. Proteins 2014;82(Suppl.2):112–126.
49. Kryshtafovych A, Barbato A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11. Proteins 2015. DOI: 10.1002/ prot24919.
50. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93–96.
51. Zemla A, Venclovas, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:13–21.
52. Zemla A. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370–3374.
53. Karplus K. SAM-T08, HMM-based protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:W492–497.
54. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl.10): 196–207.
55. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 2014; 82(Suppl.2): 164–174.
56. Kinch LN, Li W, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Grishin NV. Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL. Proteins 2015. DOI: 10.1002/prot24973.
57. Kallberg M, Wang H, Wang S, Peng J, Wang Z, Lu H, Xu J. Tem-plate-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc 2012;7:1511–1522.
58. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K. Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment. Drug Discov Today 2009;14:386–393.
59. McGuffin LJ, Buenavista MT, Roche DB. The ModFOLD4 server for the quality assessment of 3D protein models. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:W368–372.