Automated protein fold determination using a minimal NMR constraint strategy

Protein Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1232-1246

  Zheng, Deyou ^a   Huang, Yuanpeng J ^a   Moseley, Hunter N B ^a   Xiao, Rong ^a   Aramini, James ^a   Swapna, G V T ^a   Montelione, Gaetano T ^a,b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated NMR data analysis; Deuteration; Minimal NMR constraints; Selective labeling; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

CARBON 13; METHYL GROUP; NITROGEN 15; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTON TRANSPORT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; GENOMICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL PROTEIN A; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0038583694     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0300203     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aghazadeh, B., Zhu, K., Kubiseski, T.J., Liu, G.A., Pawson, T., Zheng, Y., and Rosen, M.K. 1998. Structure and mutagenesis of the DbI homology domain. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 1098-1107.
2. Andrec, M., Du, P., and Levy, R.M. 2001. Protein backbone structure determination using only residual dipolar couplings from one ordering medium. J. Biomol. NMR 21: 335-347.
3. Andrec, M., Harano, Y., Jacobson, M.P., Friesner, R., and Levy, R.M. 2002. Complete protein structure determination using backbone residual dipolar couplings and sidechain rotamer prediction. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2: 103-111.
4. Berardi, M.J., Sun, C., Zehr, M., Abildgaard, F., Peng, J., Speck, N.A., and Bushweller, J.H. 1999. The Ig fold of the core binding factor α Runt domain is a member of a family of structurally and functionally related Ig-fold DNA-binding domains. Structure 7: 1247-1256.
5. Brunger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., Delano, W.L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N.S., et al. 1998. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta. Crystallogr. D54: 905-921.
6. Burley, S.K. 2000. An overview of structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 932-934.
7. Chance, M.R., Bresnick, A.R., Burley, S.K., Jiang, J.S., Lima, C.D., Sali, A., Almo, S.C., Bonanno, J.B., Buglino, J.A., Boulton, S., et al. 2002. Structural genomics: A pipeline for providing structures for the biologist. Protein Sci. 11: 723-738.
8. Clore, G. M., Gronenborn, A.M., and Bax, A. 1998. A robust method for determining the magnitude of the fully asymmetric alignment tensor of oriented macromolecules in the absence of structural information. J. Magn. Reson. 133: 216-221.
9. Clore, G.M., Starich, M.R., Bewley, C.A., Cai, M., and Kuszewski, J. 1999. Impact of residual dipolar couplings on the accuracy of NMR structures determined from a minimal number of NOE restraints. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121: 6513-6514.
10. HC, in a perdeuterated protein. J. Magn. Reson. 140: 510-512.
11. Cornilescu, G., Hu, J.S., and Bax, A. 1999. Identification of the hydrogen bonding network in a protein by scalar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121: 2949-2950.
12. Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G.W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax, A. 1995. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6: 277-293.
13. Delaglio, F., Kontaxis, G., and Bax, A. 2000. Protein structure determination using molecular fragment replacement and NMR dipolar couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122: 2142-2143.
14. Feng, W., Rios, C.B., and Montelione, G. 1996. Phase labeling of C-H and C-C spin-system topologies: Application in PFG-HACANH and PFG-HACA(CO)NH triple-resonance expefiments for determining backbone resonance assignments in proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 8: 98-104.
15. Fetrow, J.S. and Skolnick, J. 1998. Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. J. Mol. Biol. 281: 949-968.
16. Fowler, C.A., Tian, F., AI-Hashimi, H.M., and Prestegard, J.H. 2000. Rapid determination of protein folds using residual dipolar couplings. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 447-460.
17. 15N multidimensional NMR to study the structure and dynamics of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 27: 357-406.
18. Gardner, K.H., Rosen, M.K., and Kay, L.E. 1997. Global folds of highly deuterated, methyl-protonated proteins by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry 36: 1389-1401.
19. Goddard, T.D. and Kneller, D.G. 2000. SPARKY 3. University of California, San Francisco.
20. Goto, N. and Kay, L.E. 2000. New developments in isotope labeling strategies for protein solution NMR spectroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 585-592.
21. 2H-labeled proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 13: 369-374.
22. Greenfield, N.J., Huang, Y.J., Palm, T., Swapna, G.V.T., Monleon, D., Montelione, G.T., and Hitchcock-DeGregori, S.E. 2001. Solution NMR structure and folding dynamics of the N terminus of a rat non-muscle α-tropomyosin in an engineered chimeric protein. J. Mol. Biol. 312: 833-847.
23. Gronwald, W., Moussa, S., Elsner, R., Jung, A., Ganslmeier, B., Trenner, J., Kremer, W., Neidig, K., and Kalbitzer, R. 2002. Automated assignment of NOESY NMR spectra using a knowledge based method (KNOWNOE). J. Biomol. NMR 23: 271-287.
24. 15N-enriched proteins - Application to triple-resonance 4D J-connectivity of sequential amides. J. Chem. Soc. 115: 4369-4370.
25. 15N-enriched proteins. Application to HIV-1 Nef. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117: 9594-9595.
26. Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C., and Wüthrich, K. 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273: 283-298.
27. Hansen, M.R., Mueller, L., and Pardi, A. 1998. Tunable alignment of macromolecules by filamentous phage yields dipolar coupling interactions. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 1065-1074.
28. Herrmann, T., Güntert, P., and Wüthrich, K. 2002. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA, J. Mol. Biol. 319: 209-227.
29. Huang, Y.J. 2001. Automated determination of protein structures from NMR data by iterative analysis of self-consistent contact patterns. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
30. Huang, Y.P., Swapna, G.V.T., Rajan, P.K., Ke, H., Xia, B., Shukla, K., Inouye, M., and Montelione, G.T. 2003. Solution NMR structure of ribosome binding factor A (RbfA), a cold-shock adaptation protein from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 327: 521-536.
31. Hus, J.C., Marion, D., and Blackledge, M. 2000. De novo determination of protein structure by NMR using orientational and long-range order restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 298: 927-936.
32. 15N spectra of proteins: Heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin. Biochemistry 29: 4659-4667.
33. Jansson, M., Li, Y.-C., Jendeberg, L., Anderson, S., Montelione, G.T., and Nilsson, B. 1996. High level production of uniformly 15N- and 13C-enriched fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Biomol. NMR 7: 131-141.
34. Kay, L.E., Ikura, M., Tschudin, R., and Bax, A. 1990. Three-dimensional triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy of isotopically enriched proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 89: 496-514.
35. Kennedy, M.A., Montelione, G.T., Arrowsmith, C.H., and Markley, J.L. 2002. Role for NMR in structural genomics. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2: 155-169.
36. Kim, S.H. 2000. Structural genomics of microbes: An objective. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 380-383.
37. Koradi, R., Billeter, M., and Wuthrich, K. 1996. MOLMOL: A program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graphics 14: 51-55.
38. Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946-950.
39. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., and Thornton, J.M. 1993. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26: 283-291.
40. Medek, A., Olejniczak, E.T., Meadows, R.P., and Fesik, S.W. 2000. An approach for high-throughput structure determination of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR 18: 229-238.
41. 15N-labeled protein: Potential in structure determination of large proteins by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118: 6800-6801.
42. Monleon, D., Colson, K., Moseley, H.N.B., Anklin, C., Oswald, R., Szyperski, T.A., and Montelione, G.T. 2002. Rapid analysis of protein backbone resonance assignments using cryogenic probes, a distributed Linux-based computing architecture, and an integrated set of spectral analysis tools. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2: 93-101.
43. Montelione, G.T. and Anderson, S. 1999. Structural genomics: Keystone for a human proteome project. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 11-12.
44. α coupling constants in polypeptides using heteronuclear 2D NMR experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111: 5474-5475.
45. 15N triple-resonance experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 87: 183-188.
46. Montelione, G.T., Lyons, B.A., Emerson, S.D., and Tashiro, M. 1992. An efficient triple resonance experiment using carbon-13 isotropic mixing for determining sequence-specific resonance assignments of isotopically enriched proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114: 10974-10975.
47. Montelione, G.T., Zheng, D., Huang, Y.J., Gunsalus, K.C., and Szyperski, T. 2000. Protein NMR spectroscopy in structural genomics, Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 982-985.
48. Moseley, H.N. and Montelione, G.T. 1999, Automated analysis of NMR assignments and structures for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 635-642.
49. Moseley, H.N., Monleon, D., and Montelione, G.T. 2001. Automatic determination of protein backbone resonance assignments from triple resonance nuclear magnetic resonance data. Methods Enzymol. 339: 91-108.
50. Mueller, G.A., Choy, W.Y., Yang, D., Forman-Kay, J.D., Venters, R.A., and Kay, L.W. 2000. Global folds of proteins with low densities of NOEs using residual dipolar couplings: Application to the 370-residue maltodextrin-binding protein. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 197-212.
51. Mumenthaler, C., Güntert, P., Braun, W., and Wüthrich, K. 1997. Automated combined assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional protein structure determination. J. Biomol. NMR 10: 351-362.
52. Nilges, M., Macias, M., O'Donoghue, S.I., and Oschkinat, H. 1997. Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: The refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from β-spectrin. J. MoL Biol. 269: 408-422.
53. Ottiger, M., Delaglio, F., and Bax, A. 1998. Measurement of J and dipolar couplings from simplified two-dimensional NMR spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 131: 373-378.
54. Prestegard, J.H. 1998. New techniques in structural NMR - Anisotropic interactions. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 517-522.
55. Prestegard, J.H., Valafar, H., Glushka, J., and Tian, F. 2001. Nuclear magnetic resonance in the era of structural genomics. Biochemistry 40: 8677-8685.
56. Rohl, A.C. and Baker, D. 2002. De novo determination of protein backbone structure from residual dipolar couplings using Rosetta. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124: 2723-2729.
57. Rosen, M.K., Gardner, K.H., Willis, R.C., Parris, W.E., Pawson, T., and Kay, L.E. 1996. Selective methyl group protonation of perdeuterated proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 263: 627-636.
58. 15N correlations. J. Magn. Reson. 141: 34-43.
59. Seavey, B.R., Farr, E.A., Westler, W.M., and Markley, J.L. 1991. A relational database for sequence-specific protein NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 1: 217-236.
60. Simons, K.T., Strauss, C., and Baker, D. 2001. Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 306: 1191-1199.
61. Tashiro, M., Tejero, R., Zimmerman, D.E., Celda, B., Nilsson, B., and Montelione, G.T. 1997. High-resolution solution NMR structure of the Z domain of staphylococcal protein A. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 573-590.
62. Terwilliger, T.C. 2000. Structural genomics in North America. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 935-939.
63. Tjandra, N. and Bax, A. 1997. Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science 278: 1111-1114.
64. Tolman, J.R., Flanagan, J.M., Kennedy, M.A., and Prestegard, J.H. 1995. Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: Information for structure determination in solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 9279-9283.
65. N NOEs to determine protein global folds in perdeuterated proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117: 9592-9593.
66. Wider, G. and Wüthrich, K. 1999. NMR spectroscopy of large molecules and multimolecular assemblies in solution. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 594-601.
67. 13C chemical-shift data. J. Biomol. NMR 4: 171-180.
68. 2H-labeled proteins with high-sensitivity, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116: 11655-11666.
69. Zimmerman, D.E., Kulikowski, C.A., Huang, Y., Feng, W., Tashiro, M., Shimotakahara, S., Chien, C., Powers, R., and Montelione, G.T. 1997. Automated analysis of protein NMR assignments using methods from artificial intelligence. J. Mol. Biol. 269: 592-610.
70. Zwahlen, C., Gardner, K.H., Sarma, S.P., Horita, D.A., Byrd, R.A., and Kay, L.E. 1998. An NMR experiment for measuring methyl-methyl NOEs in 13C-labeled proteins with high resolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120: 7617-7625.