Visualizing chaperone-assisted protein folding

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 691-697

  Horowitz, Scott ^a,b   Salmon, Loïc ^a,b   Koldewey, Philipp ^a,b   Ahlstrom, Logan S ^a,b   Martin, Raoul ^a,b,h   Quan, Shu ^c   Afonine, Pavel V ^d   Van Den Bedem, Henry ^e   Wang, Lili ^a,b   Xu, Qingping ^f   Trievel, Raymond C ^g   Brooks, Charles L ^a   Bardwell, James C A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^f SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHAPERONE; CHAPERONE SPY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CARRIER PROTEIN; E COLICIN-BINDING IMMUNITY PROTEIN IM7, E COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; PERIPLASMIC PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SPY PROTEIN, E COLI;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; CARRIER PROTEINS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PERIPLASMIC PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84973131613     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3237     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B. & Nussinov, R. Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem. Rev. 108, 1225-1244 (2008).
2. Fraser, J.S. et al. Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16247-16252 (2011).
3. Kay, L.E. New views of functionally dynamic proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 428 2 Pt A, 323-331 (2016).
4. Salmon, L. & Blackledge, M. Investigating protein conformational energy landscapes and atomic resolution dynamics from NMR dipolar couplings: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 126601 (2015).
5. Blackledge, M.J. et al. Conformational backbone dynamics of the cyclic decapeptide antamanide: application of a new multiconformational search algorithm based on NMR data. Biochemistry 32, 10960-10974 (1993).
6. Guerry, P. et al. Mapping the population of protein conformational energy sub-states from NMR dipolar couplings. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 3181-3185 (2013).
7. Jewett, A.I. & Shea, J.E. Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 255-276 (2010).
8. Mashaghi, A. et al. Reshaping of the conformational search of a protein by the chaperone trigger factor. Nature 500, 98-101 (2013).
9. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R. & Fersht, A.R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3571-3575 (1997).
10. Martinez-Hackert, E. & Hendrickson, W.A. Promiscuous substrate recognition in folding and assembly activities of the trigger factor chaperone. Cell 138, 923-934 (2009).
11. Saio, T., Guan, X., Rossi, P., Economou, A. & Kalodimos, C.G. Structural basis for protein antiaggregation activity of the trigger factor chaperone. Science 344, 1250494 (2014).
12. Joachimiak, L.A., Walzthoeni, T., Liu, C.W., Aebersold, R. & Frydman, J. The structural basis of substrate recognition by the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Cell 159, 1042-1055 (2014).
13. Chen, D.H. et al. Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein. Cell 153, 1354-1365 (2013).
14. Karagöz, G.E. et al. Hsp90-Tau complex reveals molecular basis for specificity in chaperone action. Cell 156, 963-974 (2014).
15. Dekker, C. et al. The crystal structure of yeast CCT reveals intrinsic asymmetry of eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins. EMBO J. 30, 3078-3090 (2011).
16. Muñoz, I.G. et al. Crystal structure of the open conformation of the mammalian chaperonin CCT in complex with tubulin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 14-19 (2011).
17. Elad, N. et al. Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Mol. Cell 26, 415-426 (2007).
18. Albert, A. et al. Structure of GroEL in complex with an early folding intermediate of alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6371-6376 (2010).
19. Quan, S. et al. Genetic selection designed to stabilize proteins uncovers a chaperone called Spy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 262-269 (2011).
20. Friel, C.T., Smith, D.A., Vendruscolo, M., Gsponer, J. & Radford, S.E. The mechanism of folding of Im7 reveals competition between functional and kinetic evolutionary constraints. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 318-324 (2009).
21. Figueiredo, A.M., Whittaker, S.B., Knowling, S.E., Radford, S.E. & Moore, G.R. Conformational dynamics is more important than helical propensity for the folding of the all á-helical protein Im7. Protein Sci. 22, 1722-1738 (2013).
22. Stull, F., Koldewey, P., Humes, J.R., Radford, S.E. & Bardwell, J.C. Substrate protein folds while it is bound to the ATP-independent chaperone Spy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 53-58 (2016).
23. Kwon, E., Kim, D.Y., Gross, C.A., Gross, J.D. & Kim, K.K. The crystal structure Escherichia coli Spy. Protein Sci. 19, 2252-2259 (2010).
24. Quan, S. et al. Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action. eLife 3, e01584 (2014).
25. Creamer, L.K., Richardson, T. & Parry, D.A. Secondary structure of bovine alpha s1-and beta-casein in solution. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 211, 689-696 (1981).
26. Chak, K.F., Safo, M.K., Ku, W.Y., Hsieh, S.Y. & Yuan, H.S. The crystal structure of the immunity protein of colicin E7 suggests a possible colicin-interacting surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6437-6442 (1996).
27. Pashley, C.L. et al. Conformational properties of the unfolded state of Im7 in nondenaturing conditions. J. Mol. Biol. 416, 300-318 (2012).
28. Burling, F.T., Weis, W.I., Flaherty, K.M. & Brünger, A.T. Direct observation of protein solvation and discrete disorder with experimental crystallographic phases. Science 271, 72-77 (1996).
29. van den Bedem, H., Dhanik, A., Latombe, J.C. & Deacon, A.M. Modeling discrete heterogeneity in X-ray diffraction data by fitting multi-conformers. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 1107-1117 (2009).
30. Brennan, S. & Cowan, P.L. A suite of programs for calculating X-ray absorption, reflection, and diffraction performance for a variety of materials at arbitrary wavelengths. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 850-853 (1992).
31. Karanicolas, J. & Brooks, C.L. III. The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G. Protein Sci. 11, 2351-2361 (2002).
32. Jewett, A.I. & Shea, J.E. Folding on the chaperone: yield enhancement through loose binding. J. Mol. Biol. 363, 945-957 (2006).
33. Bardwell, J.C. & Jakob, U. Conditional disorder in chaperone action. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 517-525 (2012).
34. Quan, S., Hiniker, A., Collet, J.F. & Bardwell, J.C. Isolation of bacteria envelope proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 966, 359-366 (2013).
35. Fischer, M., Shoichet, B.K. & Fraser, J.S. One crystal, two temperatures: cryocooling penalties alter ligand binding to transient protein sites. ChemBioChem 16, 1560-1564 (2015).
36. Battye, T.G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H.R. & Leslie, A.G. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271-281 (2011).
37. Winn, M.D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235-242 (2011).
38. Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
39. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486-501 (2010).
40. Chen, V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21 (2010).
41. Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF Chimera: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
42. Afonine, P.V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352-367 (2012).
43. Schuck, P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 78, 1606-1619 (2000).