Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action

eLife

Volumn 2014, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Quan, Shu ^a   Wang, Lili ^a   Petrotchenko, Evgeniy V ^b   Makepeace, Karl A T ^b   Horowitz, Scott ^a   Yang, Jianyi ^c   Zhang, Yang ^c   Borchers, Christoph H ^b   Bardwell, James C A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; PROTEIN VARIANT; SPY PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; PERIPLASMIC PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SPY PROTEIN, E COLI;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOSENSOR; CROSS LINKING; GENOTYPE; INTERFEROMETRY; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; WESTERN BLOTTING; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BINDING SITES; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MUTATION; PERIPLASMIC PROTEINS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84898766164     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01584     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abdiche Y, Malashock D, Pinkerton A, Pons J. 2008. Determining kinetics and affinities of protein interactions using a parallel real-time label-free biosensor, the Octet. Analytical Biochemistry 377:209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.035.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25:3389-3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
3. Aponte RA, Zimmermann S, Reinstein J. 2010. Directed evolution of the DnaK chaperone: mutations in the lid domain result in enhanced chaperone activity. Journal of Molecular Biology 399:154-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.060.
4. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, Mccammon JA. 2001. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:10037-10041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181342398.
5. Bardwell JCA, Jakob U. 2012. Conditional disorder in chaperone action. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 37:517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.08.006.
6. Basha E, Jones C, Blackwell AE, Cheng G, Waters ER, Samsel KA, Siddique M, Pett V, Wysocki V, Vierling E. 2013. An unusual dimeric small heat shock protein provides insight into the mechanism of this class of chaperones. Journal of Molecular Biology 425:1683-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.011.
7. Bitan G, Lomakin A, Teplow DB. 2001. Amyloid beta-protein oligomerization: prenucleation interactions revealed by photo-induced cross-linking of unmodified proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:35176-35184. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102223200.
8. Bracher A, Starling-Windhof A, Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. 2011. Crystal structure of a chaperone-bound assembly intermediate of form I Rubisco. Nature Structure Molecular Biology 18:875-880. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2090.
9. Brzovic PS, Heikaus CC, Kisselev L, Vernon R, Herbig E, Pacheco D, Warfield L, Littlefield P, Baker D, Klevit RE, Hahn S. 2011. The acidic transcription activator Gcn4 binds the mediator subunit Gal11/Med15 using a simple protein interface forming a fuzzy complex. Molecular Cell 44:942-953. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.008.
10. Chen JM, Sawyer N, Regan L. 2013. Proteinprotein interactions: general trends in the relationship between binding affinity and interfacial buried surface area. Protein Science 22:510-515. doi: 10.1002/pro.2230.
11. Chen R, LI L, Weng Z. 2003. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 52:80-87. doi: 10.1002/prot.10389.
12. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792-1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340.
13. Foit L, George JS, Zhang BW, Brooks CL, Bardwell JCA. 2013. Chaperone activation by unfolding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:E1254-E1262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222458110.
14. Foit L, Morgan GJ, Kern MJ, Steimer LR, Von Hacht AA, Titchmarsh J, Warriner SL, Radford SE, Bardwell JCA. 2009. Optimizing protein stability in vivo. Molecular Cell 36:861-871. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.022.
15. Georgopoulos CP, Hendrix RW, Kaiser AD, Wood WB. 1972. Role of the host cell in bacteriophage morphogenesis: effects of a bacterial mutation on T4 head assembly. Nature New Biology 239:38-41. doi: 10.1038/newbio239038a0.
16. Goldsmith M, Ashani Y, Simo Y, Ben-David M, Leader H, Silman I, Sussman JL, Tawfik DS. 2012. Evolved stereoselective hydrolases for broad-spectrum G-type nerve agent detoxification. Chemistry & Biology 19:456-466. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.017.
17. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2010. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27:221-224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259.
18. Greenfield NJ. 2006. Using circular dichroism collected as a function of temperature to determine the thermodynamics of protein unfolding and binding interactions. Nature Protocols 1:2527-2535. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.204.
19. Grimsley GR, Trevino SR, Thurlkill RL, Scholtz JM. 2013. Determining the conformational stability of a protein from urea and thermal unfolding curves. Current Protocols Protein Science 71:28.4.1-28.4.14. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps2804s71.
20. Hailu TT, Foit L, Bardwell JC. 2013. In vivo detection and quantification of chemicals that enhance protein stability. Analytical Biochemistry 434:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.11.022.
21. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. 2011. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475:324-332. doi: 10.1038/nature10317.
22. Horwich AL, Apetri AC, Fenton WA. 2009. The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device. FEBS Letters 583:2654-2662. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.06.049.
23. Jaya N, Garcia V, Vierling E. 2009. Substrate binding site flexibility of the small heat shock protein molecular chaperones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:15604-15609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902177106.
24. Kalia SK, Kalia LV, Mclean PJ. 2010. Molecular chaperones as rational drug targets for Parkinson's disease therapeutics. CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets 9:741-753. doi: 10.2174/187152710793237386.
25. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30:3059-3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436.
26. Kulig M, Ecroyd H. 2012. The small heat-shock protein alpha B-crystallin uses different mechanisms of chaperone action to prevent the amorphous versus fibrillar aggregation of alpha-lactalbumin. Biochemical Journal 448:343-352. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121187.
27. Kwon E, Kim DY, Gross CA, Gross JD, Kim KK. 2010. The crystal structure Escherichia coli Spy. Protein Science 19:2252-2259. doi: 10.1002/pro.489.
28. Martinez-Hackert E, Hendrickson WA. 2009. Promiscuous substrate recognition in folding and assembly activities of the trigger factor chaperone. Cell 138:923-934. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.044.
29. McCullum EO, Williams BA, Zhang J, Chaput JC. 2010. Random mutagenesis by error-prone PCR. Methods in Molecular Biology 634:103-109. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-652-8_7.
30. Oldfield CJ, Meng J, Yang JY, Yang MQ, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. 2008. Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners. BMC Genomics 9(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-S1-S1.
31. Pan JX, Han J, Borchers CH, Konermann L. 2009. Hydrogen/Deuterium exchange mass spectrometry with top-down electron capture dissociation for characterizing structural transitions of a 17 kDa Protein. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131:12801-12808. doi: 10.1021/ja904379w.
32. Pan JX, Han J, Borchers CH, Konermann L. 2010. Characterizing short-lived protein folding intermediates by top-down hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 82:8591-8597. doi: 10.1021/ac101679j.
33. Petrotchenko EV, Borchers CH. 2010. ICC-CLASS: isotopically-coded cleavable crosslinking analysis software suite. BMC Bioinformatics 11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-64.
34. Petrotchenko EV, Serpa JJ, Borchers CH. 2011. An isotopically coded CID-cleavable biotinylated cross-linker for structural proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10:M110420. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110420.
35. Quan S, Koldewey P, Tapley T, Kirsch N, Ruane KM, Pfizenmaier J, Shi R, Hofmann S, Foit L, Ren G, Jakob U, Xu ZH, Cygler M, Bardwell JCA. 2011. Genetic selection designed to stabilize proteins uncovers a chaperone called Spy. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18:262-269. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2016.
36. Raivio TL, Popkin DL, Silhavy TJ. 1999. The Cpx envelope stress response is controlled by amplification and feedback inhibition. Journal of Bacteriology 181:5263-5272.
37. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. 2010. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols 5:725-738. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5.
38. Schweizer RS, Aponte RA, Zimmermann S, Weber A, Reinstein J. 2011. Fine tuning of a biological machine: DnaK gains improved chaperone activity by altered allosteric communication and substrate binding. Chembiochem 12:1559-1573. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000786.
39. Serpa JJ, Patterson AP, Pan JX, Han J, Wishart DS, Petrotchenko EV, Borchers CH. 2013. Using multiple structural proteomics approaches for the characterization of prion proteins. Journal of Proteomics 81:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.10.008.
40. Siegert R, Leroux MR, Scheufler C, Hartl FU, Moarefi I. 2000. Structure of the molecular chaperone prefoldin: unique interaction of multiple coiled coil tentacles with unfolded proteins. Cell 103:621-632. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00165-3.
41. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:2731-2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121.
42. Taverner T, Hall NE, O'hair RAJ, Simpson RJ. 2002. Characterization of an antagonist interleukin-6 dimer by stable isotope labeling, cross-linking, and mass spectrometry. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:46487-46492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207370200.
43. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2002. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 00:2.3.1-2.3.22. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00.
44. Tonkin ML, Arredondo SA, Loveless BC, Serpa JJ, Makepeace KAT, Sundar N, Petrotchenko EV, Miller LH, Grigg ME, Boulanger MJ. 2013. Structural and biochemical characterization of Plasmodium falciparum 12 (Pf12) reveals a unique interdomain organization and the potential for an antiparallel arrangement with Pf41. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:12805-12817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.455667.
45. Wang JD, Herman C, Tipton KA, Gross CA, Weissman JS. 2002. Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins. Cell 111:1027-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01198-4.
46. Wang YJ, Jardetzky O. 2002. Probability-based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical-shift data. Protein Science 11:852-861. doi: 10.1110/ps.3180102.
47. Xu D, Zhang Y. 2011. Improving the physical realism and structural accuracy of protein models by a two-step atomic-level energy minimization. Biophysical Journal 101:2525-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.024.
48. Xu D, Zhang Y. 2012. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins 80:1715-1735. doi: 10.1002/prot.24065.
49. Yang H, Li J, Shin HD, Du G, Liu L, Chen J. 2013. Molecular engineering of industrial enzymes: recent advances and future prospects. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98:23-29. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5370-3.
50. Zahn M, Berthold N, Kieslich B, Knappe D, Hoffmann R, Strater N. 2013. Structural studies on the forward and reverse binding modes of peptides to the chaperone DnaK. Journal of Molecular Biology 425:2463-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.041.
51. Zhang Y. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. Bmc Bioinformatics 9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.
52. Zhu XT, Zhao X, Burkholder WF, Gragerov A, Ogata CM, Gottesman ME, Hendrickson WA. 1996. Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 272:1606-1614. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5268.1606.