Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 393-408

  Kelly, Gregory J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967592305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Bakhurst, D. (1997). Activity, consciousness, and communication. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 147-163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. F. Ball & S. Warshauer Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 53-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bloome, D., Carter, S., Christian, B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
7. Cole, M. & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cunningham, C. M. & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Precollege engineering education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume 2 (pp. 747-758). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Cunningham, C. M. & Kelly, G. J. (2015, April). Framing engineering practices in elementary school classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NARST. Chicago, IL.
10. Engineering is Elementary (2011). A long way down: Designing parachutes. Museum of Science, Boston.
11. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Milroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 202-224). San Diego: Academic.
12. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
13. Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. (F. Bradley & T. J. Trenn, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Ford, M. J. & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96, 369-391.
15. Gee. J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
16. Gee, J. P. & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
17. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
18. Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8-23.
19. Green, J. & Dixon, C. (Eds.). (1993). Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group [Special issue]. Linguistics & Education, 5(3&4).
20. Green, J. & Castanheira, M. L. (2012). Exploring classroom life and student learning: An interactional ethnographic approach. In B. Kaur (Ed.), Understanding teaching and learning: Classroom research revisited (pp. 53-65). Rotterdam, NL: Sense.
21. Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J., (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions, Educational Psychologist, 43, 142-160.
22. Greene, J. A., Torney-Purta, J., Azevedo, R., (2010). Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 234-255.
23. Gumperz, J. J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 215-228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. (translated by C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1999). The discourse reader. New York: Routledge.
27. Johnson, D. G. & Wetmore, J. M. (2008). STS and ethics: Implications for engineering ethics. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.) (pp. 567-581). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Kelly, G. J. (1997). Research traditions in comparative context: A philosophical challenge to radical constructivism. Science Education, 81, 355-375.
29. Kelly, G. J. (2006). Epistemology and educational research. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 33-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99-117; 288-291). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
31. Kelly, G. J. (2011). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In C. Linder, L. östman, D. A. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erikson, & A. McKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 61-73). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Kelly, G. J. (2014a). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume 2 (pp. 321-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Kelly, G. J. (2014b). Inquiry teaching and learning: Philosophical considerations. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1363-1380). Dordrecht: Springer.
34. Kelly, G. J. (2014c). The social bases of disciplinary knowledge and practice in Productive Disciplinary Engagement. International Journal of Education Research, 64, 211-214.
35. Kelly, G. J. & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 28-55.
36. Kelly, G. J. & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
37. Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23-49.
38. Kelly, G. J. & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81(5), 533-559.
39. Kelly, G. J., Crawford, T., & Green, J. (2001). Common tasks and uncommon knowledge: Dissenting voices in the discursive construction of physics across small laboratory groups. Linguistics & Education, 12(2), 135-174.
40. Kelly, G. J. & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world. (pp. 145-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P. -O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In K. Tobin, B. Fraser, & C. McRobbie, (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 281-291). Dordrecht: Springer.
42. Kelly, G. J. & Sezen, A. (2010). Activity, discourse, & meaning: Some directions for science education. In Roth, W.-M. (Ed.), Re/Structuring science education, ReUniting sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 39-52). Dordrecht: Springer
43. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. (pp. 15-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
48. Lewis, C. I. (1929). Mind and the world-order: Outline of a theory of knowledge. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
49. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in science inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Lynch, M. (1992). Extending Wittgenstein: The pivotal move from epistemology to the sociology of science. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 215-265). Chicago: University of Chicago press.
52. Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96, 1071-1105.
53. Murphy, P. K. (2003). The philosophy of thee: Tracing philosophical influences in educational psychology, Educational Psychologist, 38, 137-145.
54. Ostman, L. & Wickman, P.-O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98, 375-382.
55. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Ryu, S. & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96, 488-526.
58. Sandoval, W. A. & çam, A. (2011). Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95, 383-408.
59. Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company.
60. Smith, D. (1996). Telling the truth after postmodernism. Symbolic Interaction, 19(3), 171-202.
61. Strauss S. & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. Routledge: New York.
62. Strike, K. A. (1982). Liberty and learning. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
63. Strike, K. A. (1995). Discourse ethics and restructuring. Presidential address. In M. Katz (Ed.), Philosophy of Education, 1-14. Philosophy of Education Society.
64. Takao, A. Y. & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Assessment of evidence in university students' scientific writing. Science & Education, 12, 341-363.
65. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. 1: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
66. Toulmin, S. (1979). The inwardness of mental life. Critical Inquiry, 6(1), 1-16.
67. Toulmin, S. (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 53-69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
70. Watson-Verran, H. & Turnbull, D. (1995). Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 115-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325-344.
72. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
73. Wortham S. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 229-247.
74. Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511-574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.