Common Task and Uncommon Knowledge: Dissenting Voices in the Discursive Construction of Physics Across Small Laboratory Groups

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 135-174

  Kelly, Gregory ^a,b   Crawford, Teresa ^a   Green, Judith ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344064420     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00046-2     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alton-Lee, A., & Nuthall, G. (1990). Pupil experiences and pupil learning in the elementary classroom: An illustration of a generative methodology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(1), 27-45.
2. Alton-Lee, A., & Nuthall, G. (1992). Children's learning in classrooms: Challenges in developing a methodology to explain "opportunity to learn." Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 1-7.
3. Amann, K., & Knorr Cetina, K. (1990). The fixation of (visual) evidence. In M. Lynch, & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in science practice (pp. 85-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
4. Anderson, C.W., Holland, J.D., & Palinscar, A.S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. Elementary School Journal, 97, 359-383.
5. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Bianchini, J.A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1039-1065.
7. Bloome, D., & Bailey, F. (1992). From linguistics and education, a direction for the study of language and literacy. In R. Beach, J. Green, & M. Kamil (Eds.), Multiple disciplinary perspectives on language and literacy research. Urbana, IL: NCRE and NCTE.
8. Callon, M. (1995). Four models for the dynamics of science. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Pinch, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 29-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Carlsen, W.S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 1-9.
10. Carlsen, W.S. (1997). Never ask a question if you don't know the answer: The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 14-23.
11. Christie, F. (1995). Pedagogic discourse in the primary school. Linguistics and Education, 7, 221-242.
12. Corsaro, W (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Crawford, T., Chen, C., & Kelly, G.J. (1997). Creating authentic opportunities for presenting science: The influence of audience on student talk. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 1-13.
14. Cunningham, C.M., & Helms, J.V. (1998). Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 483-499.
15. Edwards, A.D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen.
16. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd ed. (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
17. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J.L. Green, & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168.
19. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
20. Gee, J., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
21. Gilbert, G.N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Green, J.L., & Bloome, D. (1997). Ethnography and Ethnographers. In B. Heath, J. Flood, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook for research in the visual and communicative arts (pp. 181-202). New York: Macmillan.
23. Green, J.L., & Meyer, L. (1991). The embeddedness of reading in classroom life: Reading as a situated process. In C. Baker, & A. Luke (Eds.), Toward a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 141-160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Green, J.L., & Wallat, C. (1979). What is an instructional context? An exploratory analysis of conversation shifts across time. In O. Garnica, & M. King (Eds.), Language, children, and society (pp. 159-174). New York: Pergamon.
25. Green, J.L., & Wallat, C. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations: A sociolinguistic ethnography. In J. Green, & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Green, J.L., Weade, R., & Graham, K. (1988). Lesson construction and student participation: A sociolinguistic analysis. In J.L. Green, & J.O. Harker (Eds.), Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse (pp. 11-48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Gumperz, J.J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Gumperz, J.J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Halliday, M.A.K. (1977). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
30. Heras, A.I. (1993). The construction of understanding in a sixth-grade bilingual classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 275-299.
31. Jasanoff, S., Markle G.E., Peterson J.C., & Pinch T. (Eds.). 1995. Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Kelly, G.J., Carlsen, W.S., & Cunningham, C.M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77(2), 207-220.
33. Kelly, G.J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
34. Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23-49.
35. Kelly, G.J., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 693-707.
36. Kelly, G.J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81(5), 533-559.
37. Kelly, G.J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti, & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Klaassen, C.W.J.M., & Lijnse, P.L. (1996). Interpreting students' and teachers' discourse in science classes: An underestimated problem? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 115-134.
39. Knorr Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Lemke, J.L. (1982). Talking physics. Physics Education, 17(6), 263-267.
42. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Lynch, M. (1992). Extending Wittgenstein: The pivotal move from epistemology to the sociology of science. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 215-265). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. McGinn, M.K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 14-24.
45. Moje, E.B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 349-371.
46. Moje, E.B. (1997). Exploring discourse, subject positions, and knowledge in chemistry class. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 35-44.
47. Pinch, T.J. (1995). Rhetoric and the cold fusion controversy: From the chemists' Woodstock to the physicists' Altamont. In H. Krips, J.E. McGuire, & T. Melia (Eds.), Science, reason and rhetoric (pp. 153-176). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
48. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Affordances of computer in teacher-student interactions: The case of interactive physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 329-347.
49. Roth, W-M. (Ed.). 1998. Science and technology studies and science education. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 1-167. Special issue.
50. Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M.K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
51. Putney, L.G. (1996). You are it: Meaning making as a collective and historical process. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 19(2), 129-143.
52. Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group (1992). Do you see what I see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 29-36.
53. Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
54. Tuyay, S., Jennings, L., & Dixon, C. (1995). Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third-grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 10(1), 75-110.