Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 988-1001

  Rapp, David N ^a   Taylor, Holly A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; HUMAN; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

COGNITION; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 4444362088     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.988     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61-80.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K. (1998). Basing categorization on individuals and events. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 203-272.
4. Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (2000). Temporal adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 74-87.
5. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
6. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
7. Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., & Fernandez, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 3, 193-209.
8. Clifton, C., Jr., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Sentence and text comprehension: Roles of linguistic structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 167-196.
9. De Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 373-385.
10. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83.
12. Hagmayer, Y., & Waldmann, M. R. (2002). How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1128-1137.
13. Hakala, C. (1999). Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Discourse Processes, 27, 261-280.
14. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 635-650.
15. Hillenbrand, L. (2001). Seabiscuit: An American legend. New York: Ballantine Books.
16. Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55, 19-24.
17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 508-529.
19. Levine, W. H., & Klin, C. M. (2001). Tracking of spatial information in narratives. Memory & Cognition, 29, 327-335.
20. Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 350-362.
21. Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663-672.
22. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533-545.
23. Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83-112.
24. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processes during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
25. McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211-1233.
26. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
27. Morrow, D. G. (1994). Spatial models created from text. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 57-78). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
28. Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292-312.
29. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165-187.
30. O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Automatic components of discourse comprehension. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 159-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (1999). Eponymous verb phrases and ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 27, 612-618.
32. Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Readers' reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 30, 779-788.
33. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers' trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737-750.
34. Rich, S. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1257-1266.
35. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Taylor, H. A., Rapp, D. N., & Klug, J. K. (2002, November). Skipping through space: Updating the unexpected in situation models. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
37. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1997). Indexing events in memory: Evidence for index dominance. Memory, 5, 509-542.
38. Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1-25.
39. Uleman, J. S., Hon, A., Roman, R. J., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). On-line evidence for spontaneous trait inferences at encoding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 377-394.
40. van den Broek, P. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1-22.
41. van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Jr., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081-1087.
42. van den Broek, P., & Trabasso, T. (1986). Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9, 1-15.
43. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
45. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196-1207.
46. Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81-88.
47. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
48. Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., & Whitten, S. N. (2000). The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability in the comprehender. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1022-1028.
49. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.
50. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
51. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199-220.
52. Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125-143.