The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness

Poetics

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 327-341

  Miall, David S ^a   Kuiken, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345775818     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(98)00002-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andringa, E., 1990. Verbal data on literary understanding: A proposal for protocol analysis on two levels. Poetics 19, 231-257.
2. Barthes, R., 1977. Image-music-text. Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Collins/Fontana.
3. Birkerts, S., 1994. The Gutenberg elegies. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
4. Culler, J., 1981. The pursuit of signs. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5. Durant, A., and N. Fabb, 1990. Literary studies in action. London: Routledge.
6. Eagleton, T., 1983. Literary theory: An introduction. London: Routledge.
7. Fish, S., 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Hanauer, D., 1996. Integrations of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics 23, 363-380.
9. Harari, J.V., 1979. Textual strategies: Perspectives in post-structuralist criticism. London: Methuen.
10. Hoffstaedter, P., 1987. Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics 16, 75-91.
11. Landow, G., 1992. Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. László, J., 1990. Images of social categories vs. images of literary and non-literary objects. Poetics 19, 277-291.
13. Miall, D.S., 1989. Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion 3, 55-78.
14. Miall, D.S., 1995. Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics 23, 275-298.
15. Miall, D.S. and D. Kuiken, 1994a. Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics 22, 389-407.
16. Miall, D.S. and D. Kuiken, 1994b. Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes 17, 337-352.
17. Miall, D.S. and D. Kuiken, 1995. Feeling and the three phases of literary response. In: G. Rusch (ed.). Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the Fourth Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature - IGEL. 282-290. Siegen: LUMIS-Publications, Siegen University.
18. Mukarovský, J., 1964/1932. Standard language and poetic language. In: P. Garvin (ed. and transl.), A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style, 17-30. Washington. DC: Georgetown University Press.
19. Mukarovský, J., 1970. Aesthetic function, norm and value as social facts. Trans. M.E. Suino. Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan Press.
20. Paivio, A., 1985. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Rose, J., 1992. Rereading the English common reader: A preface to a history of audiences. Journal of the History of Ideas 53, 47-70.
22. Schmidt, S., 1982. Foundations for the empirical study of literature: The components of a basic theory. Trans. R. de Beaugrande. Hamburg: Buske.
23. Shklovsky, V., 1965. Art as technique. In: L.T. Lemon and M.J. Reis (Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays, 3-24. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Original work published 1917.
24. Storey, R., 1993. 'I am because my little dog knows me': Prolegomenon to a theory of mimesis. In: N. Easterlin and B. Riebling (eds.). After poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and literary theory, 45-71. Evanston. IL: Northwestern University Press.
25. Tsur, R., 1983. What is cognitive poetics? Papers in Cognitive Poetics, No 1. Tel Aviv: The Katz Research Institute for Hebrew Literature, Tel Aviv University.
26. Van Dijk, T., 1979. Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics 8, 569-608.
27. Van Peer, W., 1986. Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.
28. Van Peer, W., 1995. The empirical study of (literary) texts. In: G. Rusch (ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the Fourth Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature - IGEL, 313-318. Siegen: LUMIS-Publications, Siegen University.
29. Wimsatt, W.K. and M. Beardsley, 1954. The affective fallacy. In W.K. Wimsatt (ed.), The verbal icon, 21-39. London: Methuen.
30. Zwaan, R.A., 1991. Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics 20, 139-156.
31. Zwaan, R. A., 1993. Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.