Consumer adoption of smart in-store technology: assessing the predictive value of attitude versus beliefs in the technology acceptance model

International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 26-36

  Kim, Hye Young ^a   Lee, Ji Young ^b   Mun, Jung Mee ^c   Johnson, Kim K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparel; attitude; retailing; smart technology; technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964600368     PISSN: 17543266     EISSN: 17543274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2016.1177737     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M., (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
2. Altshuller, G., (1999). The innovation algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity. Worcester, MA:Technical Innovation Center.
3. Anderson, B. S., & Eckstein, W., (2013). What’s in store:How technology is transforming the retail industry. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/US/en/services/Advisory/management-consulting/management-consulting-by-function/Documents/kpmg-retail-brick-and-mortar.pdf.
4. Avici Yucel, U., & Gulbahar, Y., (2013). Technology acceptance model:A review of the prior predictors. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(1), 89–109.
5. Barkhi, R., & Wallace, L., (2007). The impact of personality type on purchasing decisions in virtual stores. Information Technology & Management, 8, 313–330. doi:10.1007/s10799-007-0021-y
6. Çelik, H. E., & Yilmaz, V., (2011). Extending the technology acceptance model for adoption of e-Shopping by consumers in Turkey. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 152–164.
7. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S., (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511–535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
8. Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M., (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users:An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1674–1684. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016
9. Davis, F. D., (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R., (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R., (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F., (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error:Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. doi:10.2307/3150980
13. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E., (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
14. Fretwell, L., (2011). Cisco StyleMe™ virtual fashion mirror:How new consumer behaviors are enabling retailers to revitalize their stores by combining the virtual and physical worlds. Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/retail/StyleMeEngagementOverview_120611FINAL.pdf.
15. Ha, Y., & Im, H., (2014). Determinants of mobile coupon service adoption:Assessment of gender difference. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 42(5), 441–459. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-08-2012-0074
16. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W., (1988). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NY:Prentice Hall.
17. Hwang, J., & Good, L., (2014). Intelligent sensor-based services success:the role of consumer characteristics and information. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3/4), 406–431. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2011-0689
18. Jackson, T. W., Parboteeah, P., & Metcalfe-Poulton, S., (2014). The effects of consumer personality types on the attitudes and usage of self-checkout technology in the retail sector among 18–22 years old. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(2), 15–30. doi:10.5539/ijms.v6n2p15
19. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S., (2007). Hedonic usage of product virtualization technologies in online apparel shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), 502–514. doi:10.1108/09590550710750368
20. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S., (2008a). Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45–59. doi:10.1002/dir.20113
21. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S., (2008b). Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE-TAM):A multiple-group structural model comparison. Psychology & Marketing, 25(9), 901–922. doi:10.1002/mar.20245
22. Lee, H., & Chang, E., (2010). Consumer attitudes toward online mass customization:An application of extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 171–200. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01530.x
23. Lee, H., Fiore, A. M., & Kim, J., (2006). The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(8), 621–644. doi:10.1108/09590550610675949
24. Li, Y., & Huang, J., (2009). Applying theory of perceived risk and technology acceptance model in the online shopping channel. Engineering and Technology, 53, 919–925.
25. Loker, S., Ashdown, S. P., Cowie, L., & Schoenfeder, K. A., (2004). Consumer interest in commercial applications of body scan data. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4(1), 1–13.
26. Maassen, G. H., & Bakker, A. B., (2001). Suppressor variables in path models. Sociological Methods and Research, 30, 241–270. doi:10.1177/0049124101030002004
27. Müller-Seitz, G., Dautzenberg, K., Creusen, U., & Stromereder, C., (2009). Customer acceptance of RFID technology:Evidence from the German electronic retail sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(1), 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.08.002
28. Papagiannidis, S., See-to, E., & Bourlakis, M., (2014). Virtual test-driving:the impact of simulated products on purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 877–887. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.010
29. Rese, A., Schreiber, S., & Baier, D., (2014). Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale:Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 869–876. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.011
30. Rogers, E., (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY:The Free Press.
31. Silver, N., (2012). The signal and the noise:The art and science of prediction. London:Allen Lane.
32. Sobel, M. E., (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington DC:American Sociological Association.
33. Spears, B., (2014, July 21). Top 6 tech trends in the fashion industry. Apparel Magazine. Retrieved from http://apparel.edgl.com/case-studies/top-6-tech-trends-in-the-fashion-industry94135?referaltype=newsletter
34. Venkatesh, V., (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use:Integrating control, intrinsic motivation and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
35. Williams, M. D., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K., (2014). Consumers’ intentions to use e-readers. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(2), 66–76. doi:10.1080/08874417.2014.11645687
36. Yan, J. L. S., Kaziunas, E., Liu, J., & Zhuo, S., (2011). Socially-interactive dressing room:An iterative evaluation on interface design. CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper presented at the Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction (SIGCHI) 2011 conference (pp. 2023–2028), Vancouver, Canada.