The role of anonymity in peer assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 645-656

  Li, Lan ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

anonymity; peer assessment; student learning; student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964541201     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, R. S., 1998. “Why Talk about Different Ways to Grade? The Shift from Traditional Assessment to Alternative Assessment.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 74:5–16.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
2. Bellofatto, L., Bohl, N., Casey, M., Krill, M., and Dodge, B., 2001. “A Rubric for Evaluating WebQuests.” http://webquest.org/sdsu/webquestrubric.html.
3. Bostock, S. J., 2000. “Computer Assisted Assessment–Experiments in Three Courses.” A workshop at Keele University, May. http://www.keele.org.uk/docs/caa-ktn.htm
4. Brown, D., 2004. Language Assessment:Principles and Classroom Practice. New York:Longman.
5. Burke, D., and J., Pieterick. 2010. Giving Students Effective Written Feedback. Maidenhead:Open University Press.
6. Davies, P., 2000. “Computerized Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 37 (4):346–354.10.1080/135580000750052955
7. Davies, P., 2002. “Using Student Reflective Self-Assessment for Awarding Degree Classifications.” Innovations in Education and Training International 39 (4):307–319.10.1080/13558000210161034
8. Dodge, B. 1997. “Some Thoughts about WebQuests.” http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html.
9. Falchikov, N., 1986. “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11 (2):46–66.
10. Falchikov, N., 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement:Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. London:RoutledgeFalmer.
11. Freeman, M., 1995. “Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 20 (3):289–300.
12. Gibbs, G., 1999. “Using Assessment Strategically to Change the Way Students Learn.” In Assessment Matters in Higher Education:Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, edited by S., Brown and A., Glasner, 41–53. Buckingham:Open University Press.
13. Hanrahan, S., and G., Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment:The Students' Views.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1):53–71.10.1080/07294360123776
14. Huges, I. E., 1995. “Peer Assessment of Student Practical Reports and Its Influence on Learning and Skill Acquisition.” Capability 1:39–43.
15. Li, L., and F., Gao. 2015. “The Effect of Peer Assessment on Project Performance of Students at Different Learning Levels.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1048185.
16. Li, L., X., Liu, and A. L., Steckelberg. 2009. “Analyzing Peer Feedback in a Technologyfacilitated Peer Assessment.” In Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, edited by C. D., Maddux, 213–222. Chesapeake, VA:AACE.
17. Li, L., X., Liu, and A. L., Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee:How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3):525–536.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-3
18. Li, L., X., Liu, and Y., Zhou. 2012. “Give and Take:A Re-analysis of Assessor and Assessee’s Roles in Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (3):376–384.10.1111/bjet.2012.43.issue-3
19. Li, L., and A. L., Steckelberg. 2005. “Impact of Technology-mediated Peer Assessment on Student Project Quality.” Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology International Conference, Orlando, FL, 307–313.
20. Li, L., A. L., Steckelberg, and S., Srinivasan. 2009. “Utilizing Peer Interactions to Promote Learning through a Web-based Peer Assessment System.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie 34 (2). http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/497/228.
21. Liu, X., and L., Li. 2014. “Assessment Training Effects on Student Assessment Skills and Task Performance in a Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (3):275–292.
22. McAuley, E., T., Duncan, and V. V., Tammen. 1989. “Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting:A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60 (1):48–58.10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
23. Papinczak, T., L., Young, and M., Groves. 2007. “Peer Assessment in Problem-based Learning:A Qualitative Study.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 12 (2):169–186.10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6
24. Pope, N., 2001. “An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (3):235–246.
25. Raes, A., T., Schellens, and E., Vanderhoven. 2011. “Increasing Anonymity in Peer Assessment Using Classroom Response Technology.” In 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL-2011), edited by H., Spada, G., Stahl, N., Miyake and N., Law, vol. 2, 922–923. Hong Kong:International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
26. Robinson, J., 1999. “Computer-assisted Peer Review.” In Computer-assisted Assessment in Higher Education, edited by S., Brown, J., Bull, and P., Race, 95–102. London:Kogan Page.
27. Ryan, R. M., 1982. “Control and Information in the Intrapersonal Sphere:An Extension of Cognitive Evaluation Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (3):450–461.10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450
28. Ryan, R. M., V., Mims, and R., Koestner. 1983. “Relation of Reward Contingency and Interpersonal Context to Intrinsic Motivation:A Review and Test Using Cognitive Evaluation Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (4):736–750.10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.736
29. Somervell, H., 1993. “Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education:The Case for Self-, Peer and Collaborative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (3):221–233.
30. Stepanyan, K., R., Mather, H., Jones, and C., Lusuardi. 2009. “Student Engagement with Peer Assessment:A Review of Pedagogical Design and Technologies.” In Advances in Web Based Learning–ICWL 2009, edited by M., Spaniol, Q., Li, R., Klamma and R., Lau, 367–375. Berlin:Springer.
31. Topping, K., 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3):249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
32. Vygotsky, L. S., 1978. Mind in Society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
33. Zhao, Y., 1998. “The Effects of Anonymity on Computer-mediated Peer Review.” International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 4 (4):311–345.